Utilization of Wheat Straw in Sheep: Using an Applicable Method of Chemical Treatment

Utilization of Wheat Straw in Sheep: Using an Applicable Method of Chemical Treatment

J Agrobiol 27(2): 93–102, 2010 Journal of DOI 10.2478/s10146-009-0015-y ISSN 1803-4403 (printed) AGROBIOLOGY ISSN 1804-2686 (on-line) http://joa.zf.jcu.cz; http://versita.com/science/agriculture/joa ORIGINAL ARTICLE Utilization of wheat straw in sheep: Using an applicable method of chemical treatment Vaheid Chekani-Azar1, Saeid Chekani-Azar2 1Department of Animal Science, Islamic Azad University, Kashmar Branch, Kashmar, Iran 2Young Researchers Club, Islamic Azad University, Shabestar Branch, Shabestar, Iran Received: 6th October 2010 Revised: 20th December 2010 Published online: 29th December 2010 Abstract As part of research on utilization of straw as a feedstuff for small ruminants, wheat straw (WS) was pretreated with a warmed solution (4%) of NaOH (sodium hydroxide) and then treated with SO2 (sulphur dioxide) gases of different sulphur levels (0, 1, 2 and 4 percent, weight/weight of dry matter) for two periods of 1 and 2 smoking days. The chemical composition, and dry matter degradability (DMD) of the neutral detergent fibres (NDF), acid detergent fibres (ADF) and acid detergent lignin (ADL) in sheep rumen was determined, as was also the intake of the treated straw and the performance of Ghizle strain lambs. To estimate rumen DMD, treated WS samples were immersed in the rumen for a 72 h incubation period using the nylon bag (in sacco) technique. The chemical composition of the treated WS was changed with either one of NaOH or NaOH+SO2 prior to the rumen incubation, and the amounts of lignin, cellulose, hemicelluloses and silica significantly decreased specially in the SO2-smoked wheat straw. Dry and organic matter decreased non-significantly (P>0.05). The rumen DMD rate of the WS SO2-treated for a period of 48 hours did show higher values (P<0.01) compared to those smoked during 1 day. In sacco degradation also significantly decreased NDF, ADF and ADL. The best results were observed with WS SO2 samples smoked to 4% level during 2 days, followed by 2% level with the same smoking period. Although, a higher intake of treated WS was calculated for those smoked by 2% SO2 gas for a period of 1 d, the best performance was observed in lambs fed WS treated by NaOH+SO2 for a period of 2 days. It is concluded that chemical treatment of wheat straw by NaOH (4%) solution and SO2 (2%) gas smoking for a period of 2 days, can be used as an applicable method on a farm scale for better utilization of WS as a feedstuff for small ruminants such as sheep. Key words: sulphur dioxide; sodium hydroxide; degradability; wheat straw; performance; sheep INTROdUCTION Vahied Chekani-Azar, Department of Animal Science, Islamic Azad University, Kashmar Processing methods for wheat straw and other Branch, Kashmar, Iran grain straw have been investigated to determine [email protected] whether they will enhance their nutritional value for livestock. Consequently, by-product foods are 93 Journal of Agrobiology, 27(2): 93–102, 2010 becoming increasingly more important in the (Berger et al. 1991, Galetti 1991, Ben-Ghedalia food and fibre system because they are available et al. 1994, Yosef et al. 1994). The dry treatment for use as livestock feeds at competitive prices method in which straw is simply sprayed with a relative to other commodities (Grasser et al. 1995). limited volume of an alkali solution, overcomes The benefit of such processing depends upon the the obvious disadvantages of the older Beckmann animal species and production level. In sheep method with a high water requirement and high for example the impact of differently processed dry matter losses, and makes the industrialization wheat straw is varied. On the one hand, chemical of straw treatment possible. However, the quality treatment of straw has been shown a to produce of Beckmann-treated straw is higher than better degradability and digestibility (Varvikko that of spray-treated straw. Hence, a modified and Lindberg 1985, Berger et al. 1991, Yosef et Beckmann process has been recognized as the al. 1994, Brown and Kunkle 2005), but on the best wet treatment method because it eliminates other hand, it is well-known that it also decreases dry matter loss, environmental pollution and palatability and intake of straw, especially when also, drastically reduces water requirements. treated with sulphur dioxide (SO2) (LeSoning and Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) is the most effective Klopfenstein 1981, Nasseven and Kincaid 1992, in this regard because, it can effectively dissolve Mehrez and Orskov 1997). lignin, silica, and hemicelluloses (Ben-Ghedalia Agricultural by-products have many uses and Yosef 1994). in Asia. The objectives of processing methods On the other hand, for farm scale treatment, of feedstuffs or by-products such as straw are the dry method can be used on the individual to increase the degradability and subsequently farm. It is simple and equipment costs can usually the digestibility, voluntary consumption and be paid by the individual farmer. In this method, digestible energy intakes. For these purposes, dry straw is sprinkled or sprayed with a diluted the main methods have been classified broadly NaOH solution so that it is uniformly wetted. into physical (by grinding the material into ball When straw is spray-treated with 60–120 l of mills and pressure cooking), chemical (by the NaOH solution (i.e.bulk treatment) it can be use of alkalis or other chemicals like chlorine) stacked, ensiled or NH3-treated by stacks under and biological (by culturing certain specific types plastic sheet and also can be stored from a month of fungi on straw). These processing methods to a year. It has been concluded that if the straw have been used either singly or in combination is treated in bulk with NaOH there can be a bonus (Varvikko and Lindberg 1985). The reported of enhanced effectiveness of the added alkali. results have shown that a combination of two Significant effects have been reported when the or three methods together can be more effective straw which has been spray-treated with NaOH (Dryden and Leng 1988, Nasseven and Kincaid is treated once more with sulphur dioxide (SO2) 1992, Kindsigo and Kallas 2006). The physical gas. Oxidizing agents act by disruption of the treatments such s size reduction, result in bonds in the lignocellulosic complex and within increases in the surface area of cellulosic and the cellusosic fraction (Miron and Ben-Ghedalia lignocellulosic residues and also, decrease the 1994). The results of many experiments on alkali- crystallinity which can increase susceptibility treated straw by researchers have shown that to chemical action or enzymatic attack (Oshea the chemical treatment of wheat straw by NaOH and Baldwin 1986). But processing of residues, and SO2 gas has had significant effects on the particularly microbial processing, can introduce degradability of cellulosic and lignocellulosic problems of nutritional and toxicological materials and therefore on their digestibility acceptability (Djajanegara and Doyle 1989). (Miron et al. 2001 a, b, Brown and Kunkle 2005), Chemical processing methods of straw are better but it also affects the palatability and hence the than other methods, especially treatment in the intake of chemically treated straw (Ben-Ghedalia form of mould, or wet and heat treating (Oshea and Miron 1984, 2001). and Baldwin 1986, Ben-Ghedalia et al. 1994, In the current study, we investigated the Kindsigo and Kallas 2006). effects of the chemical treatment of wheat straw With regard to issues such as cost, effectiveness, by a dilute sodium hydroxide (NaOH, 4%) solution and suitability under different conditions, many and different levels of sulphur dioxide gases chemicals such as alkali [NaOH, Ca(OH)2 or (SO2; 0, 1, 2, 4%) for a smoking period of 1 or 2 NH3] and oxidizing agents [SO2, NaClO2 (or days, corresponding to the traditional chemical ClO2), H2O2, O3, etc. ] by either “wet” or “dry” processing of raisin in East Azerbaijan province, methods have been tested for straw treatment Iran. We explored the use of this method in Asia 94 Journal of Agrobiology, 27(2): 93–102, 2010 for the chemical processing of by-products, its straw was then dried in free sunny weather for a chemical composition, in sacco degradability and period of 12 h. voluntary consumption of wheat straw in male sheep. Animals, feeds and feeding The amount of 5 grams from either of the treated samples were used for an incubation time of 72 h MATERIALS ANd METHOdS by means of the in sacco nylon bag technique (AFRC 1992), in which bags were suspended in Treating samples the rumen of the sheep and then the rumen dry The wheat straw (WS) samples with approximate matter degradability (RDMD) was calculated. In size of 3–4 centimetres were supplied by a this part of the presented study, four fistulated threshing machine. Chemical treatment of wheat sheep (Ghizle strain, 53±2.5 kg) were used and straw was carried out in a way similar to the nylon bags, 5 × 12 cm in size with a pore size traditional method of SO2 treatment of raisins. of approximately 50 µm and a string of 50 cm As with the treatment mentioned, wheat straw length, were used in a series of in sacco ruminal is uniformly wetted with a dilute NaOH (4%) incubations. Dried, treated samples were solution, and then SO2 smoked by burning sulphur previously ground in a Wiley mill with a sieve of in a metallic dish which is placed in a wooden cage 2 mm size. (0.8 × 0.5 × 0.3 meters) and completely covered The fistulated animals were offered a diet of by thick plastic. Chopped straw (two kilograms 60% hay and 40% concentrate including lucerne, per pen) and required amounts of sulphur were barley and soybean meal twice a day at 08:00 h weighed and placed on the floor of the prepared and 14:00 h and had free access to water, and pens.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    10 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us