Staphylococcal Infections JOHN S

Staphylococcal Infections JOHN S

14 Staphylococcal Infections JOHN S. BRADLEY and VICTOR NIZET CHAPTER OUTLINE Epidemiology and Transmission Pneumonia Staphylococcus Aureus Meningitis Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci Brain Abscess Microbiology Osteomyelitis and Septic Arthritis Staphylococcus Aureus Gastrointestinal Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci Diagnosis Pathogenesis of Disease Antibiotic Treatment Virulence Mechanisms of Staphylococcus General Principles Aureus Vancomycin Virulence Mechanisms of Coagulase- Clindamycin and Erythromycin Negative Staphylococci Linezolid Role of Host Defenses Daptomycin Pathology Quinupristin-Dalfopristin Clinical Manifestations Combination Antimicrobial Therapy Bacteremia/Sepsis Catheter Removal Toxic Shock Syndromes Prevention Endocarditis Hygienic Measures Pustulosis, Cutaneous Abscess, Cellulitis Antibiotic Prophylaxis Adenitis and Parotitis Immune Prophylaxis Breast Infection Conclusion Funisitis, Omphalitis, Necrotizing Fasciitis Staphylococcal Scalded Skin Syndrome and Bullous Impetigo Staphylococcal disease has been recognized in neonates for centuries and reported at least as early as 1773, when Epidemiology and Transmission 1 pemphigus neonatorum was described. Outbreaks of STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS staphylococcal disease in nurseries were first noted in the late 1920s,2 and the memorable term “cloud baby” was Many factors influence transmission of staphylococci subsequently coined to describe index cases, often asymp- among newborns, including nursery design, density of tomatic, who contaminated the nursery atmosphere with the infant population, and obstetric and nursing practices. Staphylococcus aureus that colonized their respiratory tract, Other factors influencing transmission include virulence skin, or umbilical cord.3 Until the late 1970s, staphylo- properties of the individual S. aureus strains and immuno- coccal disease in newborn infants was caused most often genetic factors characteristic of the newborn host. A par- by S. aureus.4 However, in the recent decades, coagulase- ticular factor that is critical in one epidemic may not be a negative staphylococci (CoNS) have assumed an equally driving factor under different circumstances. important role, especially in premature infants in neona- Quantitative culture studies demonstrate that very small tal intensive care units (NICUs),5-7 often responsible for numbers of S. aureus are capable of establishing coloniza- half or more of all cases of clinically significant bacterial tion in the newborn. Fewer than 10 bacteria can initi- disease. Management of staphylococcal disease in infants ate umbilical colonization in 50% of newborns, whereas has become increasingly more complicated, reflecting the approximately 250 organisms can produce the same effect increasing incidence of methicillin resistance and the threat on the nasal mucosa.8 Colonization of the newborn umbili- of vancomycin resistance among isolates of S. aureus and cus, nares, and skin takes place early in life. By the fifth day CoNS. This chapter summarizes current information about in the nursery, the colonization rate among nursery inhab- S. aureus and CoNS and the diseases these organisms pro- itants may be as high as 90%.9 The umbilicus or rectum duce in newborns and young infants. usually is colonized before the nares are.10,11 475 476 SECTION II • Bacterial Infections Most evidence indicates that the initial and perhaps major as pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) or multilocus source of S. aureus infection is medical and nursing person- sequence typing (MLST). MLST is a sequence-based typing nel.8 A S. aureus strain common among medical attendants system that uses the sequence of seven or more housekeep- is far more likely than a maternal strain to colonize a given ing genes to evaluate the genetic relatedness of strains of infant in the nursery12; in 85% of cases, infant coloniza- staphylococci.29 The discriminatory power of this approach tion with S. aureus is likely to originate from an attendant’s is less than that of PFGE, so the usefulness for the evaluation touch.13 Persons with overt cutaneous lesions or disease of local outbreaks is less.30 Next-generation whole-genome often are highly contagious, but asymptomatic carriers sequencing has recently been applied to investigate MRSA can also be contagious,14 and carriage on the skin, in the transmission in the NICU setting and identified an increased anterior nares, and in the perineal area is relevant.15,16 The risk of transmission from infants with as yet undiscovered frequency of intestinal carriage of the pathogen may be MRSA colonization, in contrast to known MRSA-positive greatly underestimated.17 infants.31 Soon after the introduction of methicillin in 1960, meth- icillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) emerged as an important COAGULASE-NEGATIVE STAPHYLOCOCCI nosocomial pathogen.18 For MRSA, resistance is medi- ated through the mecA gene, which encodes an altered Coagulase-negative staphylococci are common inhabitants penicillin-binding protein (PBP2a) with markedly reduced of human skin and mucous membranes. Staphylococcus affinity for most β-lactam antibiotics.19 MRSA isolates epidermidis is the species found most commonly as a mem- frequently harbor additional antibiotic resistance determi- ber of the normal flora of the nasal mucosa and the umbi- nants, further limiting treatment options. Risk factors for licus of the newborn.32 With sensitive culture techniques, MRSA infection include prior antimicrobial treatment, pro- the nose, umbilicus, and chest skin are colonized with CoNS longed hospitalization, and stay within an intensive care in up to 83% of neonates by 4 days of age.33 Rates of colo- unit.20 Since the mid-1990s, infection with community- nization with S. epidermidis in one study of infants in a large acquired MRSA (CA-MRSA) has been reported increas- academic NICU were as follows: nose, 89%; throat, 84%; ingly in patients without hospital contact or traditional umbilicus, 90%; and stool, 86%; simultaneous percentages risk factors for MRSA.21,22 CA-MRSA strains typically for S. aureus were 17%, 17%, 21%, and 10%, respectively.32 have a distinct antibiotic susceptibility pattern, and more Although most infants acquire CoNS from environmental frequently cause skin and soft tissue infections or necro- sources, including hospital personnel, a small percentage tizing pneumonias compared with methicillin-susceptible are colonized by vertical transmission.34,35 Isolates of S. S. aureus (MSSA). CA-MRSA isolates are readily transmitted epidermidis and other CoNS resistant to multiple antibiotic between family members and close contacts.22 agents are common. In a study involving premature neo- The National Institute of Child Health and Human Devel- nates, D’Angio and associates36 demonstrated that the inci- opment (NICHD) Neonatal Research Network reported that dence of strains resistant to multiple antibiotics rose from from 2006 to 2008, approximately 3.7% of initial episodes 32% to 82% by the end of the first week of life. of late-onset sepsis (LOS) or meningitis among very-low- The observation that CoNS are important nosocomial birth-weight (VLBW) infants (<1500 g) were caused by pathogens among newborns, especially low-birth-weight S. aureus, with 28% of these attributable to MRSA; outcomes (LBW) infants in NICUs, is explained by the prevalence of were similar in the two groups.23 Carey and colleagues24 colonization with these organisms at multiple sites and the reported the epidemiology of MSSA and MRSA in the NICU widespread use of invasive therapeutic modalities that sub- at Columbia University Medical Center. During the study vert normal host epithelial barrier defenses. Examples of inva- period, there were 123 infections caused by MSSA and sive treatments include endotracheal intubation, mechanical 49 infections caused by MRSA (28%). Overall, the clinical ventilation, placement of umbilical and other central venous presentations and the crude mortality rates (16%-17%) catheters, urinary bladder catheters, and ventriculoperitoneal were similar in both groups, although infants with MRSA shunts, and the use of feeding tubes. In recent epidemiology, infections were significantly younger at clinical presenta- CoNS account for greater than half of bloodstream isolates tion than infants with MSSA infections. The most common obtained from neonates with LOS.5-7 An inverse relationship manifestations were bacteremia (36%), skin/soft tissue/ exists between the rate of infection with CoNS and both birth wound infection (31%), bacteremia plus skin/soft tissue weight and gestational age. Additional risk factors that are infection (15%), endocarditis (7%), and rare cases of trache- associated with CoNS bacteremia among VLBW neonates itis, osteomyelitis, meningitis, or mediastinitis. The risk of include respiratory distress syndrome, bronchopulmonary developing MSSA or MRSA infection was inversely related dysplasia, patent ductus arteriosus, severe intraventricular to birth weight, with 53% of infections occurring in VLBW hemorrhage, and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC).5,7 infants and the majority of infections in infants weighing Certain nutritional factors are associated with the devel- greater than 2500 g associated with surgical procedures. opment of LOS, including delayed initiation of enteral Reports of small outbreaks of community-acquired MRSA feeding, prolonged period to reach full enteral feeding sta- in NICUs and well-baby nurseries have appeared with tus, delayed re-attainment of birth weight, and prolonged increasing frequency.25-27

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    30 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us