Laser/Plasma-Pumped Rare Gas Laser Guy Parsey, John Verboncoeur, Andrew Christlieb Michigan State University

Laser/Plasma-Pumped Rare Gas Laser Guy Parsey, John Verboncoeur, Andrew Christlieb Michigan State University

Laser/Plasma-Pumped Rare Gas Laser Guy Parsey, John Verboncoeur, Andrew Christlieb Michigan State University Extending from diode-pumped alkali vapor lasers Kinetic Global Modeling Optically-Pumped Argon Laser Models (DPAL), Han and Heaven have shown that rare gas metastable states, np5(n + 1)s[3/2] , can operate as 2 General species continuity and electron energy equa- Recreating the experimental results of Han and Heaven the base of a three-level laser with excition of the tion (solved for T ) with reaction rates K e i • Optical pumping: centered at 811.75nm, ∆ν = 30GHz, duration (n + 1)s → (n + 1)p transitions. Though both the R dnα X α Y Deff 10ns, and energy of 0.25mJ rare gas lasers (RGL) and DPALs can be excited = νi Ki nj − 2 dt i j Λ Gas cell: R = 2.5cm, L=60cm over a range of pressures with incoherent optical pumping, RGLs do not suf- • " # REI d 3 Peff X • RF power: 18kV separated by 2.5 cm for 10ns fer from the highly reactive behavior of alkali met- neTe = − ne niKi∆Eij als. Since metastable populations are maintained dt 2 V i • Observed optimized delay between discharge and laser pulses 5-25µs Integrated reaction rates (when cross section is via electric discharge, we propose using a tuned elec- known, e.g. [4]) with parameterized EEDFs tron energy distribution function (EEDF) to modify Z ∞ Ki(x, Te) = dε v(ε)σi(ε)fe(ε, x, Te) RGL efficiencies and drive the population inversion. 0 The EEDF is maintained by the discharge along with the introduction of electron sources. Otherwise fitted ana- Using our kinetic global modeling framework lytical forms or con- (KGMf) and two gas systems (helium buffered ar- stants from the litera- gon and pure argon), we first validate the intracavity ture, e.g. [5], are used intensity laser model and then generate gain and en- for reaction rates ergy efficiency baselines for each system. Parameter MW power deposition: assumed power absorption Equilibrated argon species scanning methods are then used to find optimized Optimum delay time between MW discharge instead of RF: or time-enveloped effective electric field convoled responding to MW discharge EEDFs and system parameters for metastable pro- discharge and optical pump: nominal non-zero background and with EEDF followed by optical pumping pulse. −3 duction, generation of a lasing population inversion, [Arg] = 4.e25m → 2.3 µs 10ns gaussian discharge and increasing RGL operation efficiencies. Finally, Laser Model: Pumping and Output we determine if an RGL can operate without optical Pure Plasma Laser Concept Argon with Helium Buffer pumping. Two-way averaged plane-wave model with assump- Plotting the Argon excitation cross sections reveals a Difficulty in exciting He yields a good buffer gas tions on spectral distribution [3]. core problem of operating without optical pumping • He species DPAL → RGL Scaled gain term g considered: j + DPAL, first published by Krupke et. al. [1], βji = lgσji(nj− ni) Heg and He gi demonstrating three-level laser oscillation between Stim. emission • Non-linear the 2S , 2P , and 2P excited levels of Rb and relationship 1/2 1/2 3/2 ˜ stim βji Ψ Cs. Kji = between lg hνji + Wide-band incoherent Pumping intensity derived indepenent of the ν He:Ar ratio pumping to drive distribution Not directly possible: and output - Vaporized alkali metal P (t) intensity P 2 • Overlap between 1s5 Ω(t) = tP (1 − exp [β31])(1 + tP RP exp [β31]) Optimum He:Ar ratios and pulse delay times can be - Quench gas CH3 leads to lg and 2p10 occurs at found for each background pressure. hydrides (“laser snow”) The output intensity is defined from the two-way in- ~40eV ⇒ ⇒ ⇒ Han and Heaven [2] showed transitions between the tracavity circulating intensity, with continuity equa- • EEDF with bulk at References 3 3 3 noble gas excitations P2, S1, and D3 have the tion ~40eV will excite higher 2 same spectral properties as DPAL with benefits: dΨ(t) Ψ σ21c hν21 (unwanted) 2p states = (tLR exp [2β21] − 1) + n2 [1] Kanz, Krupke, Beach and Payne. Opt.Lett., 28, 2336 • Inert reagents in system dt τ l rt g [2] J. Han and M.C. Heaven. Opt. Lett., 37, 2157 • Lower temperature Which is related to the output intensity as Future Work [3] Rudolph, Zameroski, Hagar, Hostutler. J. Opt. Sc. Am. • Neutral collision partners β t (1 − R) exp [β ] I (t) = ηΨ(t) 21 L 21 B, 28, 1088 Both systems are attractive due to the coherent na- Lase 2 • Tracking a discretized spectral distribution (exp [β21] − 1)(1 + tLR exp [β21]) [4] Biagi-v8.9, http://www.lxcat.laplace.univ-tlse.fr, 7.4.12 ture of the output Note: R is the power reflectivity and t are the pump • Indirect methods for plasma pumped laser ∗ [5] NIST, http://www.nist.gov/pml/data/asd.cfm, 7.13.12 and laser gain cell window transmission coefficients • Continuing He buffer study with Kr.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    1 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us