Oldowan-Ch2-Semaw.Pdf

Oldowan-Ch2-Semaw.Pdf

stone age institute publication series Series Editors Kathy Schick and Nicholas Toth Stone Age Institute Gosport, Indiana and Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana Number 1. THE OLDOWAN: Case Studies into the Earliest Stone Age Nicholas Toth and Kathy Schick, editors Number 2. BREATHING LIFE INTO FOSSILS: Taphonomic Studies in Honor of C.K. (Bob) Brain Travis Rayne Pickering, Kathy Schick, and Nicholas Toth, editors Number 3. THE CUTTING EDGE: New Approaches to the Archaeology of Human Origins Kathy Schick, and Nicholas Toth, editors Number 4. THE HUMAN BRAIN EVOLVING: Paleoneurological Studies in Honor of Ralph L. Holloway Douglas Broadfield, Michael Yuan, Kathy Schick and Nicholas Toth, editors STONE AGE INSTITUTE PUBLICATION SERIES NUMBER 1 THE OLDOWAN: Case Studies Into the Earliest Stone Age Edited by Nicholas Toth and Kathy Schick Stone Age Institute Press · www.stoneageinstitute.org 1392 W. Dittemore Road · Gosport, IN 47433 COVER PHOTOS Front, clockwise from upper left: 1) Excavation at Ain Hanech, Algeria (courtesy of Mohamed Sahnouni). 2) Kanzi, a bonobo (‘pygmy chimpanzee’) fl akes a chopper-core by hard-hammer percussion (courtesy Great Ape Trust). 3) Experimental Oldowan fl aking (Kathy Schick and Nicholas Toth). 4) Scanning electron micrograph of prehistoric cut-marks from a stone tool on a mammal limb shaft fragment (Kathy Schick and Nicholas Toth). 5) Kinesiological data from Oldowan fl aking (courtesy of Jesus Dapena). 6) Positron emission tomography of brain activity during Oldowan fl aking (courtesy of Dietrich Stout). 7) Experimental processing of elephant carcass with Oldowan fl akes (the animal died of natural causes). (Kathy Schick and Nicholas Toth). 8) Reconstructed cranium of Australopithecus garhi. (A. garhi, BOU-VP-12/130, Bouri, cranial parts, cranium recon- struction; original housed in National Museum of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa. ©1999 David L. Brill). 9) A 2.6 million-year-old trachyte bifacial chopper from site EG 10, Gona, Ethiopia (courtesy of Sileshi Semaw). Back: Photographs of the Stone Age Institute. Aerial photograph courtesy of Bill Oliver. Published by the Stone Age Institute. ISBN-10: 0-9792-2760-7 ISBN-13: 978-0-9792-2760-8 Copyright © 2006, Stone Age Institute Press. All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, without permission in writing from the publisher. CHAPTER 2 THE OLDEST STONE ARTIFACTS FROM GONA (2.6-2.5 MA), AFAR, ETHIOPIA: IMPLICATIONS FOR UNDERSTANDING THE EARLIEST STAGES OF STONE KNAPPING BY SILESHI SEMAW ABSTRACT simple core/flake artifacts discovered from the Lower Beds of Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania. The Gona artifacts Gona is key for understanding the earliest stages of are the earliest examples of this “least effort” core/flake ancestral human stone technology. Systematic investi- tradition, and it is argued here that the stone assem- gations at Gona (1992-94) led to the discovery of EG10 blages dated between 2.6-1.5 Ma group into the and EG12, which yielded more than 3,000 surface and Oldowan Industry. The first intentionally produced excavated artifacts. The artifacts are dated to 2.6-2.5 sharp-edged stones made an abrupt entrance into the 40 39 million years (Ma) by Ar/ Ar and paleomagnetic archaeological record by 2.6 Ma, and the same patterns stratigraphy, and are the oldest yet documented from of stone manufacture persisted for over a million years anywhere in the world. Thus, they offer the best oppor- with little change suggesting a “technological stasis” in tunity for investigating the earliest stages of ancestral the Oldowan. hominin stone technology, raw material preference and selection strategy. The evidence strongly indicates that KEY WORDS: the first toolmakers, though at the early stages of cross- Gona, Earliest stone tools, Late Pliocene stone ing over the threshold, had sophisticated control of con- assemblages, Oldowan Industry choidal fracture, selected for raw materials with good flaking quality, and had remarkable skills in producing INTRODUCTION sharp-edged flakes. A handful of slightly younger arti- fact sites are known in East Africa including Omo and Continued systematic archaeological investigations Hadar from Ethiopia, and Lokalalei from Kenya. Earlier of the major East African Late Pliocene sites are shed- descriptions alleged the Lokalalei 1 hominins to have ding further light on the initial appearance and the ear- been technologically less advanced, but to the contrary, lier stages of stone technology, and the adaptive role excavated materials recovered from the contiguous tools played in the lives of ancestral hominins. The Lokalalei 2C have shown that the toolmakers com- major sites including Gona, Bouri and Hadar are locat- manded excellent flaking control, further corroborating ed within the main Afar Rift of Ethiopia (Kimbel et al., earlier observations made by Semaw et al. (1997). 1996; Semaw, 2000; Semaw et al., 1997; Asfaw et al., Bouri, from the Middle Awash has yielded the oldest 1999; de Heinzelin et al., 1999), Omo, in the southern cutmarked fossilized animal bones dated to 2.5 Ma, part of the Ethiopian rift (Chavaillon, 1976; Merrick, complementing the archaeology of Gona by showing 1976; Howell et al., 1987) and Lokalalei, at West unequivocally that the earliest artifacts were used for Turkana, in northern Kenya (Kibunjia, 1994; Kibunjia processing animal carcasses. Further, Bouri has pro- et al., 1992; Roche et al., 1999). The stone assemblages duced Australopithecus garhi, probably the best candi- and contextual data from these sites are providing major date for making and using the earliest artifacts. The insights on the beginnings of stone technology and Oldowan was named for the 1.8 Ma non-standardized ancestral hominin tool use behavior. The earliest and the 44 The Oldowan: Case Studies Into the Earliest Stone Age most informative of these are the stone artifacts exca- Dominguez-Rodrigo et al., 2001). vated from the two East Gona sites of EG10 and EG12. Detailed descriptions of the Gona stone assem- Bouri is dated to 2.5 Ma, and Omo, Lokalalei and Hadar blages and their geological context are provided in this are from slightly younger deposits dated between 2.4- chapter. In addition, the chapter offers the background 2.3 Ma. archaeological information for comparing with the Archaeological reconnaissance survey of the Gona results currently available from the analysis of the first deposits began in the 1970's, and initial fieldwork experimental replicative stone knapping conducted on showed the presence of a low density of artifacts east water-worn ancient river cobbles sampled from Gona. and west of the Kada Gona River (Roche et al., 1977, The river cobbles were sampled from the conglomerate 1980; Harris, 1983; Harris & Semaw, 1989). Extensive probably used as the source of the same raw materials and systematic investigations of the two sites between used by the first toolmakers. The cobbles were brought 1992-94 produced more than 3,000 surface and exca- to the U.S. under a permission granted by the Authority vated artifacts. Based on a combination of radioisotopic for Research and Conservation of Cultural Heritage (40Ar/39Ar) and paleomagnetic dating techniques, EG10 (ARCCH) of the Ministry of Youth Sports and Culture and EG12 were firmly dated between 2.6-2.5 Ma and of Ethiopia. The knapping experiments were carried out the stone assemblages are the oldest yet known from by Nicholas Toth and Kathy Schick (CRAFT Research anywhere in the world (Semaw, 2000; Semaw et al., Center, Indiana University), and by non-human pri- 1997). The EG10 and EG12 stone artifacts were mates (chimpanzees) from the Language Research deposited in fine-grained sediments and excavated with- Center in Atlanta, Georgia (Toth et al., this volume). in a primary geological context, therefore, offering the best opportunity for investigating the stone manufacture BACKGROUND: THE SEARCH FOR THE techniques and skills of the first toolmakers, and for understanding the overall behavioral repertoire of Late OLDEST STONE TOOLS IN AFRICA Pliocene hominins. Analysis of the EG10 and EG12 artifacts show that the first toolmakers had sophisticat- Early Half of the 20th Century ed understanding of the mechanics of conchoidal frac- It is useful to present here a brief overview of ear- ture on stones, that they selected for appropriate size lier investigations undertaken in search of the oldest and fine-grained raw materials with good flaking quali- stone tools in East Africa to provide a historical link and ty, and commanded superior control in stone working a background for the major research activities and techniques than previously recognized. Based on the archaeological discoveries recently made at several Late remarkable knapping skills shown at EG10 and EG12, Pliocene/Early Pleistocene sites. Comprehensive sum- Semaw et al. (1997) suggested that Late Pliocene mary and details of important events on the history of hominins had a clear mastery and sophisticated under- archaeological research in Africa during the late 19th standing of stone flaking techniques comparable to and the early parts of the 20th Century are provided in Early Pleistocene Oldowan toolmakers. The recently Gowlett (1990; see also Clark, 1976; Tobias, 1976). The excavated LA2C assemblages of West Turkana (Roche initial search for early stone tools in Africa started dur- et al., 1999) further corroborate this suggestion.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    37 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us