Download UK Press Coverage of the EU Referendum

Download UK Press Coverage of the EU Referendum

1 / 44 Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism UK PRESS COVERAGE OF THE EU REFERENDUM David A.L. Levy, Billur Aslan, Diego Bironzo REUTERS INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF JOURNALISM / UK PRESS COVERAGE OF THE EU REFERENDUM 2 / 3 Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism UK PRESS COVERAGE OF THE EU REFERENDUM David A.L. Levy, Billur Aslan, Diego Bironzo Published by the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism in association with PRIME Research Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism A British Union Jack flag and a European flag fly on the Amiens city hall during a Franco-Britain summit in Amiens, northern France, March 3, 2016. REUTERS/Philippe Wojazer REUTERS INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF JOURNALISM / UK PRESS COVERAGE OF THE EU REFERENDUM CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 6 WHO WAS CITED IN THE UK PRESS? 26 1. INTRODUCTION 7 6.1 Summary 26 1.1 Summary 7 6.2 People Quoted in Total 26 1.2 Focus of the Research 7 6.3 The Most Quoted Groups 28 1.3 Press versus Wider Media 7 6.4 Most Quoted Politicians in the 1.4 Methodology in Summary 8 EU Referendum Focused Articles 29 2 EUROPE AS AN ISSUE 9 7 EU REFERENDUM NEWS IN THE LAST FOUR DAYs OF THE CAMPAIGN PERIOD 31 2.1 Summary 9 2.2 Europe as a Salient Issue 9 7.1 Summary 31 2.3 The Referendum as a Political Response 11 7.2 Visibility of EU Referendum News in the 2.4 Newspapers and the Referendum Campaign 11 Last Four Days 31 2.4.1 Explicit Endorsements 11 7.3 Position of Articles 31 2.4.2 A Long Eurosceptic tradition in the 7.4 Articles’ Campaign Position by Newspaper 32 Most Popular Press Titles 11 7.5 Arguments Advanced by the Press 32 2.4.3 Readership of British Newspaper: 7.6 Coverage on the Day of the Strong Partisanship? 12 Referendum 23 June 33 3 VOLUME, VISIBILITY, AND PROMINENCE 8. CONCLUSION 34 OF EU REFERENDUM NEWS 13 8.1 Key Findings 34 3.1 Summary 13 8.2 Implications 34 3.2 Overall Volume of Referendum News 13 3.3 Visibility- Where Referendum News is Placed 14 APPENDIX A. METHODOLOGY IN DETAIL 37 3.4 Size of Articles 14 3.5 Number of Articles by Time Period 15 APPENDIX B. TIMELINE 41 4 DEGREE OF PARTISANSHIP OVERALL BIBLIOGRAPHY 44 AND BY NEWSPAPER 16 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS/ 4.1 Summary 16 ABOUT THE AUTHORS 46 4.2 Overall Position of the Press 16 4.3 Position of Each Newspaper. 17 4.4 Newspaper Positions Weighted by Reach 17 4.5 Overall Positions Over Time 19 4.6 Formal Campaign Positions by Newspapers 19 5 POPULAR TOPICS/ARGUMENTS COVERED BY NEWSPAPERS 20 5.1 Summary 20 5.2 Classifying Arguments 20 5.3 Analysis of Headlines by Topic 20 5.4 Analysis of Issues Covered in Articles 21 5.5 Arguments by Newspaper 22 5.6 Variation of Arguments Over Time 23 5.7 The Tone of EU Referendum Focused Articles 24 5 / 44 4 / 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. FOCUS AND GOALS OF RESEARCH Mirror had the fewest but the strongly pro Leave tabloids, the Sun and the Daily Express, had a relatively large number of • This report is based on research that set out to examine the referendum focused articles given their size. press coverage of the EU referendum in the UK and ask • Generally broadsheet newspapers were more likely to place two key research questions. First, how did the British press EU referendum focused articles on the front page, but the cover the EU referendum story? Second, what were the main Express bucked the trend by also doing this, thereby reflecting stories and issues deployed on each side of the argument? its strong political position. This quantitative analysis informed consideration about how the campaign was reported, but attempting a full qualitative • The size of the articles was greatest in the Daily Mail, assessment of all stories covered or of their accuracy was The Times, and the Guardian. outside the scope of this project. • The number of articles built over time and the final month • The research involved detailed analysis by PRIME Research accounted for nearly half of all the EU referendum focused of two days of press coverage (Tuesdays and Saturdays) each articles featured in the whole four-month period. week for the London editions of nine national newspapers over the four months of the campaign. 4. DEGREE OF PARTISANSHIP OVERALL AND BY NEWSPAPER • Our sample consisted of 3,403 articles discussing the • Of the articles focused on the referendum 41% were pro Leave referendum, of which 2,378 were explicitly focused on as against 27% pro Remain, marking a dominant pro Brexit bias. the referendum. The analysis was conducted both at the article level and through close examination of the content of • Six out of nine newspapers had this dominance of pro Leave messages within all the EU referendum focused articles. articles, with the strongest positions in the Daily Express, followed by the Daily Mail and the Sun. The Daily Mirror • The concentration on the printed press was dictated in part had the highest share of Remain articles, followed by the by resources, and the role of the press in helping set the Guardian and the Financial Times. All newspapers, whether agenda for other media, and in addition because newspapers predominantly pro Leave or pro Remain, included some articles still account for the largest share of investment in original from a different point of view but this proportion was smallest in journalism. the pro Leave Daily Express. 2. THE RISE OF EUROPE AS A POLITICAL AND PRESS ISSUE • After factoring in the reach of different newspapers the pro Brexit bias is further accentuated, with 48% of all referendum • Europe was not a particularly salient issue for most voters in the focused articles pro Leave and just 22% Remain. period until 2010 and only became so after it was linked with immigration. • Most newspapers adopted a clear position on the referendum in the last week of the campaign, with the Leave campaign • The referendum campaign coincided with a decline in David supported by all the Conservative-leaning press other than Cameron’s popularity. The Times. • The Remain campaign went into the referendum campaign unable or unwilling to articulate a positive vision and more 5. POPULAR TOPICS/ARGUMENTS COVERED AND TONE focused on the risks of Brexit. • Discussion of the vote and campaign accounted for about • The strong Eurosceptic tradition of the largest selling half the headlines monitored, with the arguments and issues newspapers continued in the campaign period. involved accounting for just 42% of headlines. 3. VOLUME, VISIBILITY, AND PROMINENCE OF EU • When looking at the issues covered in articles the economy REFERENDUM NEWS was first, followed by sovereignty and migration. But while the economy featured both in pro Leave and pro Remain • The volume of articles was greatest in the Daily Mail and the messages, issues such as sovereignty, terrorism, and migration Daily Telegraph. Tabloids such as the Daily Star and Daily skewed heavily to Leave. REUTERS INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF JOURNALISM / UK PRESS COVERAGE OF THE EU REFERENDUM • The tone of the messages adopted throughout the • The Times was an exception, with a majority of pro Leave campaign was quite negative but the Remain camp’s articles in the last four days, even after they had come out future-focused messages tended to be the most negative, for Remain. particularly on the economy, with the Leave camp’s • The economy still dominated among issues discussed but messages about the future much more positive or optimistic, with a significant increase in articles focused on sovereignty especially around the issue of UK sovereignty. and a minor increase in those discussing migration. 6. SPOKESPEOPLE • The newspaper front pages on referendum day reflected the very polarised nature of their coverage. • Almost half those cited in articles were either UK politicians or campaign representatives. 8. CONCLUSIONS • Analysts/experts, academics, and foreign politicians featured • The press coverage focused heavily on a ‘game frame’ with relatively little (respectively 11%, 2%, and 5%). a strong focus on the contest and the strategies and on • 64% of the UK politicians cited in articles were politicians and campaign representatives with other voices, Conservatives, as opposed to 17% Labour. whether experts, academics, foreign politicians, or citizens, rather under-represented. • Theresa May kept a relatively low profile as the eleventh most cited politician. • In what was a very complex decision the detailed issues were underplayed and when they were covered this was • Jeremy Corbyn attracted very little attention, being quoted done in a highly partisan way, reflecting the position of each in just 3–4% of articles in the Guardian and Mirror, about a paper and often following the lead of each campaign. third as many times as David Cameron or Boris Johnson. • This approach chimed well with the preconceptions of • Pro Leave campaigners were cited in 74% of articles as voters who already had firm positions but probably less so against just 26% pro Remain. for voters seeking high-quality information to make up their • Of the small number of academics quoted, just one, minds. Professor Patrick Minford, strongly associated with the Leave • Press coverage may have worked better at reflecting the campaign, accounted for a fifth of all quotes on our sample emotional and game-based aspects of the campaign than days. the issue-based ones. 7. EU REFERENDUM NEWS IN THE LAST FOUR DAYS • In the last four days of the campaign the number of articles increased dramatically and generally all newspapers tended be less inclined to publish articles opposed to their stated position.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    48 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us