NP & Predicate Semantics

NP & Predicate Semantics

LX502 Semantics 1. Non-verbal predicates (nouns, adjectives, prepositions) Many nouns and adjectives can be treated in the same way as intransitive verbs. [[ dog ]] = [l x : x Î De . x is a dog] = [l x . x is a dog] “the function that maps every x Î De to 1 if x is a dog and to 0 otherwise” [[ blue ]] = [l x : x Î De . x is blue] = [l x . x is blue] S [[ Bruce ]] = Bruce – TN NP1 VP [[ boy ]] = [l x . x is a boy] – by TN [[ VP ]] = [[ DP ]] = [[ NP ]] = [[ N ]] = [[ boy ]] – by NN N V DP 2 [[ NP1 ]] = [[ N ]] = [[ Bruce ]] – by NN D NP Bruce is 2 [[ S ]] = [[ VP ]] ( [[ NP1 ]] ) – by FA = [l x . x is a boy] ( Bruce ) a N = 1 iff Bruce is a boy boy Transitive nouns, adjectives, and prepositions are analogous to transitive verbs [[ fond ]] = [l x . [l y . y is fond of x]] [[ part ]] = [l x . [l y . y is part of x]] [[ in ]] = [l x . [l y . y is in x]] 2. Predicates as restrictive modifiers in NP (1) a part [PP of Asia] (argument) (2) a city [PP in Texas] (restrictive modifier/adjunct) (3) Bruce, [PP from New Jersey] (nonrestrictive modifier) [[ city in Texas ]] = [[ city ]] Ç [[ in Texas ]] intersective modifier DP [[ city ]] = l x . x is a city – by TN D NP [[ Texas ]] = Texas – by TN [[in]] = l x . [l y . y is in x] – by TN N PP a [[PP]] = [[P]] ( [[NP2]] ) – by FA P NP = l x . [l . y is in x] (Texas) city = l y . y is in Texas [[N]] = [[ city ]] = l x . x is a city – by NN in N [[NP]] = ?? Texas Predicate Modification (PM) If a is a branching node with daughters { b, g }, and [[ b ]] and [[ g ]] are both in D<e,t> (both are functions of type <e,t>), then [[ a ]] = l x Î De . [ [[ b ]](x) = [[ g ]](x) = 1]. [[NP]] = l x . [ [[N]](x) = [[PP]](x) = 1 ] = l x . [ l x . x is a city](x) = [l y . y is in Texas](x) = 1 = l x . [ x is a city = x is in Texas = 1 ] DP DP 3. Non-intersective modifiers D NP D NP (4) Felix is a gray cat N N’ = Felix is gray and Felix is a cat a AP a AP (5) Felix is a gray cat entails Felix is a gray animal N A cat A AP (6) Fievel is a big mouse =? Fievel is big and Fievel is a mouse gray smart A cat (7) Fievel is a big mouse entails? Fievel is a big animal gray 1 LX502 Semantics [[ big ]] = [l f : f Î D<e,t> . [l x : x Î De . f(x) = 1 and the size of x is big]] [[ big ]] = [l f : f Î D<e,t> . [l x : x Î De . f(x) = 1 and the size of x is above the average size of the elements of {y : f(y) = 1} ]] [[ gray ]] = [l f : f Î D<e,t> . [l x : x Î De . f(x) = 1 and x is gray]] [[ small ]] = [l x : x Î De . the size of x is below that of the contextually salient standard ] 4. Definite determiners [[the]] is a function applied to a predicate (a function) to yield an individual: f: D<e,t> à De [[the]] applied to [[dog]] yields “the dog Rover” [[the]] applied to [[president of the USA]] yields “Clinton” Uniqueness presupposition: a definite DP presupposes that there exists a single unique individual (in the utterance context) denoted by the DP. (8) [[the]] = [l f : f Î D<e,t> & there is exactly one x s.t. f(x) = 1 . the unique y s.t. f(y) = 1 ] (8)'[[the]] = [l f : f Î D<e,t> & there is exactly one x Î Ce s.t. f(x) = 1 . the unique y Î C s.t. f(y) = 1, where Ce is a contextually salient subset of De (9) I will meet you at the elevator in CAS. (10)I will meet you at the escalator in CAS. (11)The domain of [[the]] contains just those functions f Î D<e, t> which satisfy the condition that there is exactly one x for which f(x) = 1 (in the utterance context). (12)A partial function from A to B is a function from a subset of A to B. (13)John is on the escalator in CAS. (14) a is uninterpretable if it can be proved from the semantics alone that a is outside the domain of [[ ]]. (15) a is a presupposition failure if it is a contingent matter of fact that a is outside the domain of [[ ]]. Homework: Exercise p. 66: Kaline is a [ [ [ gray cat ] in Texas ] fond of Joe ] Exercise 1, p. 79 Exercise 2, p. 80 Readings of interest: Hintikka, J. and Kulas, J. (1985). Anaphora and definite descriptions: Two applications of game-theoretical semantics. Dordrecht: Reidel. Maratsos, M. P. (1976). The use of definite and indefinite reference in young children: An experimental study of semantic acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Partee, B. H. (1995). Lexical semantics and compositionality. In L.R. Gleitman and M. Liberman (Eds.), Language. An invitation to cognitive science. 2nd edition (Vol. 1, pp. 311-360). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Partee, B. H., ter Meulen, A., & Wall, R.E. (1990). Mathematical methods in linguistics. Dordrecht/Boston: Kluwer. 2.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    2 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us