Comparison of Antiemetic Efficacy Between Single and Repeated

Comparison of Antiemetic Efficacy Between Single and Repeated

ANTICANCER RESEARCH 29: 1721-1726 (2009) Comparison of Antiemetic Efficacy between Single and Repeated Treatments with a 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonist in Breast Cancer Patients with High-risk Emetogenic Chemotherapy KEIKO TAGUCHI1, HIROTOSHI IIHARA2, MASASHI ISHIHARA2, YOSHIFUMI KOMORI2, KATSUMI TANIZAWA1, KATSUHIKO MATSUURA2 and YOSHINORI ITOH2 1Department of Pharmacy, Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center, Gifu; 2Department of Pharmacy, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu, Japan Abstract. Background: The significance of repeated treatment drug reactions (ADRs) such as myelosuppression, congestive with the 5-HT3 receptor antagonist for prophylaxis of heart disease and emesis. Nausea and vomiting associated chemotherapy-induced emesis remains to be clarified. Patients with cancer chemotherapy include acute and delayed events and Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed to (6-8). Acute emesis occurs within a day of chemotherapy, compare the effects of single and repeated treatment with while delayed event appears after 24 h and persists for granisetron on anorexia, nausea and vomiting in patients several days. Moreover, anticipatory emesis develops before with breast cancer who undertook anthracycline and chemotherapy, particularly in patients who experienced cyclophosphamide-based cancer chemotherapy. Results: The emesis in the previous chemotherapy (9-11). According to control of anorexia was significantly better in the single the guidelines for prevention of cancer chemotherapy- treatment group than in the repeated treatment group (54% induced emesis documented by the Multinational Association versus 73% ; odds ratio (OR), 0.433; 95% confidence intervals of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) (12), the American (CI), 0.226-0.828; p=0.016), although the rate of complete Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (13, 14), and the response to any signs of the gastrointestinal side-effects was National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) (15), not different between the two groups (37% versus 39% ; OR, anticancer agents are classified into four risk categories 0.911; CI, 0.489-1.700; p=0.874). However, the incidence of (high, moderate, low and minimal risks) based on the constipation was more frequent in the repeated treatment group frequency of emesis. Anthracyclines or cyclophosphamide (60% versus 37% ; OR, 2.586; CI, 1.388-4.818; p=0.003). are on their own categorized as moderate risk anticancer Conclusion: Repeated treatment with 5-HT3 receptor agents, but they are regarded as high-risk regimen when used antagonist is not likely to be beneficial to breast cancer in combination (12, 14). For high-risk anticancer agents, the patients who undertook anthracycline/cyclophosphamide combination of three classes of agents such as 5-HT3 combination chemotherapy. receptor antagonists, dexamethasone and the neurokinin NK1 receptor antagonist aprepitant is prescribed before Several clinical practice guidelines have suggested that chemotherapy for prevention of acute emesis, while the anthracycline/cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy (AC combination of dexamethasone and aprepitant is chemotherapy) is currently the standard regimen for adjuvant recommended for the prophylaxis of delayed emesis (12, 14- and neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer, as well as 17). However, in Japan, the combination of 5-HT3 receptor for the therapy of metastatic or recurrent breast cancer (1- antagonist and dexamethasone is used before chemotherapy, 5). However, AC chemotherapy causes a number of adverse and dexamethasone alone or in combination with dopamine D2 receptor antagonists or anti-anxiety drugs is prescribed after chemotherapy, since none of the NK1 receptor antagonists are currently available. Correspondence to: Yoshinori Itoh, Department of Pharmacy, Gifu The 5-HT receptor antagonist is highly effective in University Hospital, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu 501-1194, Japan. Tel: +81 3 582307080, Fax: +81 582307093, e-mail: [email protected] suppressing acute emesis since 5-HT liberated from enterochromaffin cells largely contributes to the early phase Key Words: Anthracycline, cyclophosphamide, breast cancer, anti- of chemotherapy-induced emesis (18-20). However, it emesis, 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, repeated treatment, constipation. remains uncertain whether the repeated administration of 0250-7005/2009 $2.00+.40 1721 ANTICANCER RESEARCH 29: 1721-1726 (2009) Table I. Patients’ demographics. Table II. Comparative effects of single and repeated treatment with 5-HT3 receptor antagonist on the incidence of anorexia, nausea, Single Repeated vomiting and other adverse reactions such as constipation and treatment treatment hematological toxicities in patients with breast cancer who underwent chemotherapy containing anthracycline and cyclophosphamide. Number of patients 29 30 Average of age (years, range) 49.2 (30-68) 53.3 (26-69) Adverse events Single Repeated p-Valuea Body surface area (m2) 1.50±0.02 1.53±0.02 treatment treatment Number of courses 79 90 (79 courses) (90 courses) Aspartic aminotransferase (U/L) 24.3±1.5 24.6±1.3 Alanine aminotransferase (U/L) 25.5±2.8 25.3±1.9 Anorexia Serum creatinine (mg/dL) 0.61±0.01 0.65±0.03 Grade 1 15 (19% ) 29 (32% ) 0.055 Chemotherapy regimens Grade 2 6 (8% ) 10 (11% ) 0.600 EC 70 courses 62 courses Grade 3 0 (0% ) 2 (2% ) 0.499 FEC 9 courses 28 courses Any grade 21 (27% ) 41 (45% ) 0.016 Doses Nausea Epirubicin (mg) 124±19 113±22 Grade 1 45 (57% ) 35 (39% ) 0.021 Cyclophosphamide (mg) 783±118 694±132 Grade 2 5 (6% ) 9 (10% ) 0.419 Delayed treatment Grade 3 0 (0% ) 2 (2% ) 0.500 Dexamethasone 47 courses 85 courses Any grade 50 (63% ) 46 (51% ) 0.122 Vomiting EC: Epirubicin + cyclophosphamide; FEC: fluorouracil + epirubicin+ Grade 1 8 (10% ) 5 (6% ) 0.387 cyclophosphamide. Grade 2 4 (5% ) 5 (6% ) 1.000 Grade 3 0 (0% ) 0 (0% ) 1.000 Any grade 12 (15% ) 10 (12% ) 0.496 5-HT3 receptor antagonist is effective for prevention of Other ADRs delayed emesis. A meta-analysis of 5 randomized control Constipation trials has shown that the effect of 5-HT receptor antagonist Grade 1 25 (32% ) 35 (39% ) 0.339 3 Grade 2 4 (5% ) 19 (21% ) 0.003 on delayed emesis is slightly but significantly higher than that Grade 3 0 (0% ) 0 (0% ) 1.000 of placebo but is not different from that of dexamethasone Leukopenia (21). On the other hand, 5-HT3 receptor antagonist causes Grade 1 11 (14% ) 9 (10% ) 0.480 constipation by reducing gastrointestinal motility (22, 23), Grade 2 17 (22% ) 11 (12% ) 0.146 which may hinder the antiemetic action. Nevertheless, Grade 3 14 (18% ) 9 (10% ) 0.179 Anemia repeated administration of 5-HT3 receptor antagonist is an Grade 1 21 (27% ) 20 (22% ) 0.590 alternative for prevention of chemotherapy-induced delayed Grade 2 8 (10% ) 10 (11% ) 1.000 emesis in the NCCN guideline for antiemesis (14-17). In the Grade 3 1 (1% ) 1 (1% ) 1.000 present study, the effect of single versus repeated treatment Thrombocytopenia with the 5-HT receptor antagonist granisetron was Grade 1 3 (4% ) 9 (10% ) 0.142 3 Grade 2 0 (0% ) 0 (0% ) 0.600 retrospectively studied in patients with breast cancer who Grade 3 0 (0% ) 0 (0% ) 1.000 underwent anthracycline/cyclophosphamide combination chemotherapy from the view point of the therapeutic effect as aFisher’s exact probability test. ADRs, adverse drug reactions. well as the cost effectiveness. Patients and Methods performed every 21 days for up to 6 courses. Fifty-nine patients received a total of 169 courses of the chemotherapy. Subjects. Fifty-nine patients with breast cancer who underwent AC chemotherapy at Gifu University Hospital and Gifu Prefectural Surveillance for adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The incidence of General Medical Center during January 2007 and December 2007 anorexia, nausea, vomiting and other ADRs that occurred during 4 were included in the study. Patients’ demographics are shown in days after AC chemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed from the Table I. Patients were all treated with intravenous granisetron (3 electronic medical records and nursing records. The rate of complete mg) and dexamethasone (16-24 mg) before chemotherapy. After absence of anorexia, nausea and vomiting was also calculated. The chemotherapy, granisetron was administered orally for 3 days in a severity of the adverse events was graded according to the Common total of 90 cases (repeated treatment group) but not in a total of 79 Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0 (CTCAE). patients (single treatment group). Statistical analysis. Data were analyzed using Statistics Program for Chemotherapy. The combination chemotherapy containing Social Science (SPSS X, version 11) for Windows (SPSS Inc., epirubicin (75-100 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (500-600 Chicago, IL, USA). The incidence of ADRs or the rate of complete mg/m2) alone (EC) or with 5-fluorouracil (500 mg/m2) (FEC) was absence of anorexia, nausea and vomiting was compared between 1722 Taguchi et al: Use of Antiemetic 5-HT3 Antagonist Figure 1. Comparison of the antiemetic response (A) and the incidence of constipation (B) between single and repeated treatment with granisetron in patients with breast cancer who underwent combination chemotherapy with anthracycline and cyclophosphamide. Granisetron was administered intravenously on day 1 in all patients, while the agent was administered orally on days 2-4 in the repeated treatment group. The antiemetic effects were shown as the rate of complete absence of anorexia, nausea, vomiting or all symptoms. Data were statistically compared by Fisher’s exact probability test. single treatment group and repeated treatment group and the statistical constipation of any grade between the two groups. The significance was analyzed by Fisher’s exact probability test. The control of anorexia was better in the single treatment group p-values of less than 0.05 were regarded as statistically significant. than in the repeated treatment group (54% versus 73% , OR, 0.433; 95% CI, 0.226-0.828; p=0.016), although the rate of Results complete response to any signs of the gastrointestinal side- effects was not different between the two groups (37% Comparison of chemotherapy regimens and medications for versus 39% ; OR, 0.911; 95% CI, 0.489-1.700; p=0.874).

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    5 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us