Cflipl Interrupts IRF3–CBP–DNA Interactions to Inhibit IRF3-Driven Transcription

Cflipl Interrupts IRF3–CBP–DNA Interactions to Inhibit IRF3-Driven Transcription

Published June 24, 2016, doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1502611 The Journal of Immunology cFLIPL Interrupts IRF3–CBP–DNA Interactions To Inhibit IRF3-Driven Transcription Lauren T. Gates and Joanna L. Shisler Type I IFN induction is critical for antiviral and anticancer defenses. Proper downregulation of type I IFN is equally important to avoid deleterious imbalances in the immune response. The cellular FLIP long isoform protein (cFLIPL) controls type I IFN production, but opposing publications show it as either an inhibitor or inducer of type I IFN synthesis. Regardless, the mechanistic basis for cFLIPL regulation is unknown. Because cFLIPL is important in immune cell development and proliferation, and is a target for cancer therapies, it is important to identify how cFLIPL regulates type I IFN production. Data in this study show that cFLIPL inhibits IFN regulatory factor 3 (IRF3), a transcription factor central for IFN-b and IFN-stimulated gene expression. This inhibition occurs during virus infection, cellular exposure to polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid, or TBK1 overexpression. This inhi- bition is independent of capase-8 activity. cFLIPL binds to IRF3 and disrupts IRF3 interaction with its IFN-b promoter and its coactivator protein (CREB-binding protein). Mutational analyses reveal that cFLIPL nuclear localization is necessary and suf- ficient for inhibitory function. This suggests that nuclear cFLIPL prevents IRF3 enhanceosome formation. Unlike other cellular IRF3 inhibitors, cFLIPL did not degrade or dephosphorylate IRF3. Thus, cFLIPL represents a different cellular strategy to inhibit type I IFN production. This new cFLIPL function must be considered to accurately understand how cFLIPL affects immune system development and regulation. The Journal of Immunology, 2016, 197: 000–000. ype I IFNs (IFN-a, IFN-b) are very important cytokines sequences in promoters for genes encoding IFN-b and IFN- for human health. They are produced in response to virus stimulated genes (ISGs) (6, 7, 9, 10). Importantly, cofactors like T infection (1). The administration of type I IFN inhibits CREB-binding protein (CBP) must also be recruited to IRF3 for tumor growth in experimental animals and in some human tu- effective IRF3-controlled transcription (7). mors (2). However, this same immune response must be care- Healthy cells must downregulate or prevent type I IFN pro- fully controlled. For example, increased type I IFN levels cause duction. Several cellular proteins are known to inhibit IRF3 to this disease symptoms associated with autoimmunity (3). Thus, there end. These include TRIM26 (11), PPA2 (12), RACK1 (12), FoxO1 is a cellular regulatory network that precisely modulates type I (13), and RAUL (14). Most of these proteins bind to and modify IFN production to avoid deleterious imbalances in the immune the transcriptionally active IRF3 to ultimately induce IRF3 pro- response. teosomal degradation. In contrast, PPA2 binds to and dephos- The cellular proteins that control type I IFN production are well phorylates transcriptionally active IRF3 to halt IRF3-driven trans- known (1, 4, 5). This includes apical cellular molecules (e.g., cription (12). Regardless, the study of cellular inhibitory mechanisms MAVS, TLR3) that recognize microbial pathogen-associated mi- is critical to rationally control type I IFN to avoid deleterious im- crobial pathogens such as viral nucleic acids or cancer DNA, and balances in the immune response. ε intermediate signaling molecules (e.g., TBK1, IKK ) that directly cFLIPL was originally characterized as an antiapoptosis protein, stimulate IFN regulatory factor 3 (IRF3) via phosphorylation. which has made it an attractive target for cancer therapies (15). IRF3 then dimerizes and translocates to the nucleus. IRF3 forms cFLIPL also is critical for the development of embryos (16), an enhanceosome (6–8), where IRF3 binds to specific recognition macrophages (17), and T cells (18), and for lymphocyte prolif- eration (18, 19). Several publications show that cFLIPL regulates Department of Microbiology, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, type I IFN production (20–22), which would impact the current IL 61801 thinking about how cFLIPL performs its known functions. How- ORCIDs: 0000-0002-7602-8216 (L.T.G.); 0000-0003-4833-1557 (J.L.S.). ever, these reports show opposing effects of cFLIPL, in which Received for publication December 17, 2015. Accepted for publication May 26, cFLIPL induces or inhibits type I IFN production (20–22). Re- 2016. gardless, the molecular mechanism for this cFLIPL function re- This work was supported by the University of Illinois and the National Institutes of mains unknown. This is an important gap in knowledge if the Health. scientific community expects to understand how to regulate cFLIPL Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Joanna L. Shisler, Department and IRF3 activation to achieve proper immune responses and im- of Microbiology, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, B103 CLSL, 601 S. Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801. E-mail address: [email protected] mune system homeostasis (3, 23). The online version of this article contains supplemental material. Type I IFN production is controlled by several transcription factors, including NF-kB, IRF3 and IRF7, and AP1 (5). To ask Abbreviations used in this article: CBP, CREB-binding protein; ChIP, chromatin immunoprecipitation; CLD, caspase-like domain; DBD, DNA binding domain; how cFLIPL inhibits type I IFN production, we used several ap- DED, death effector domain; IP, immunoprecipitated; IRF3, IFN regulatory factor proaches to stimulate and detect IRF3 activation independent of 3; ISG, IFN-stimulated gene; MEF, mouse embryonic fibroblast; MVA, modified vaccinia Ankara; NLS, nuclear localization sequence; PARP, poly(ADP-ribose) po- these other transcription factors. We found that cFLIPL inhibited lymerase; pIRF3CA, constitutively active phospho-mimetic form of IRF3; poly I:C, IRF3-induced gene transcription triggered by virus infection, polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid; shFLIP, shRNA-expressing FLIP; shRNA, short hair- polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid (poly I:C), or TBK1 overexpres- pin RNA. sion. When probing events of the IRF3 activation pathway, cFLIPL Copyright Ó 2016 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. 0022-1767/16/$30.00 allowed IRF3 phosphorylation and nuclear translocation. However, www.jimmunol.org/cgi/doi/10.4049/jimmunol.1502611 2 cFLIPL BINDS TO IRF3 AND INHIBITS IRF3 ACTIVATION cFLIPL prevented IRF3-controlled transcription, IRF3–promoter I:C was used, 293T-TLR3 cells were transfected as above. At 24 h later, interactions, and IRF3–CBP interactions. Coimmunoprecipitation cells were transfected with 1000 ng poly I:C, and cells were lysed 6 h later. analyses showed that cFLIP interacted with IRF3. Mutational Modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA) is an attenuated strain of vaccinia virus L (28). Transfected cells were infected with MVA at a multiplicity of in- analysis of cFLIPL showed that IRF3 interactions and cFLIPL fection of 5 PFU/cell in serum-free MEM for 1 h, rocking every 15 min. nuclear localization are critical for inhibitory function. Together, Virus-containing supernatant was removed and replaced with complete 3 these data suggest that cFLIPL prevents the formation of the IRF3 medium. At 6 h postinfection, cells were lysed. All cells were lysed in 1 enhanceosome, blocking nascent IRF3 transcriptional action. passive lysis buffer (Promega), and luciferase activity was detected using the Dual Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega) and quantified with Unlike other cellular IRF3 inhibitors, cFLIPL did not degrade or Clarity Luminescence Microplate Reader (BioTek Instruments). Analysis dephosphorylate IRF3. This mechanism is distinct from other of firefly and sea pansy luciferase activities was performed, as described known cellular IRF3 inhibitors, molecules that act on IRF3 only previously (21). Values are shown as mean 6 SD. The Student t test was after IRF3 has initiated transcription. used to determine the statistical significance of inhibition of luciferase activity by wild-type and mutant FLIPs versus cells transfected with pCI. Statistically significant inhibition of luciferase activity as compared with Materials and Methods untreated, pCI-transfected cells is indicated by asterisks (*p , 0.05, **p , Cell culture 0.005). A portion of each lysate was also analyzed for protein expression by immunoblotting. Human embryonic kidney 293T, mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs), the A549 nonsmall cell lung cancer cell line cells, HCT116 colorectal carci- Quantitative RT-PCR noma cells, and AsPC-1 pancreatic adenocarcinoma human cell lines were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection. The 293T-TLR3 cell The 293T cells or A549 cell lines stably expressing either the shRNA to line stably overexpresses the human TLR3 gene (R. Tapping, University of cflar (shFLIP) or no shRNA (control) were transfected with 1000 ng pCI, Illinois, Urbana, IL). Cells were cultured in appropriate medium supple- pFLAG-cFLIPL, or pMC159 in technical triplicates. In some experiments, mented with 10% FBS (Fisher) and 1% penicillin streptomycin (Fisher). 293T cells were cotransfected with 500 ng pCI or pTBK1 for 24 h. Al- ternatively, 24 h posttransfection, A549 cells were incubated with 2 mg Lentivirus infection poly I:C for 6 h. Total RNA was extracted using an RNAeasy extraction kit. cDNA was generating using the M-MuLV reverse transcriptase (New Control (LL3.7) and short hairpin RNA (shRNA)-expressing FLIP (shFLIP)

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    11 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us