Revival and Phylogenetic Analysis of the Luminous Bacterial Cultures of MW Beijerinck

Revival and Phylogenetic Analysis of the Luminous Bacterial Cultures of MW Beijerinck

RESEARCH ARTICLE Historical microbiology: revival and phylogenetic analysis of the luminous bacterial cultures of M. W. Beijerinck Marian J. Figge1, Lesley A. Robertson2, Jennifer C. Ast3 & Paul V. Dunlap3 1The Netherlands Culture Collection of Bacteria, CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands; 2Department of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands; and 3Department of Ecological and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA Correspondence: Paul V. Dunlap, Abstract Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, 830 North Luminous bacteria isolated by Martinus W. Beijerinck were sealed in glass University Ave., Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1048, ampoules in 1924 and 1925 and stored under the names Photobacterium phos- USA. Tel.: +1 734 615 9099; fax: +1 734 phoreum and ‘Photobacterium splendidum’. To determine if the stored cultures 763 0544; e-mail: [email protected] were viable and to assess their evolutionary relationship with currently recog- nized bacteria, portions of the ampoule contents were inoculated into culture Present address: Jennifer C. Ast, medium. Growth and luminescence were evident after 13 days of incubation, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Departments of Molecular Evolution and Limnology, Uppsala indicating the presence of viable cells after more than 80 years of storage. The University, Norbyva¨ gen 18C, 752 36, Beijerinck strains are apparently the oldest bacterial cultures to be revived from Uppsala, Sweden. storage. Multi-locus sequence analysis, based on the 16S rRNA, gapA, gyrB, pyrH, recA, luxA, and luxB genes, revealed that the Beijerinck strains are distant Received 3 May 2011; revised 21 July 2011; from the type strains of P. phosphoreum, ATCC 11040T, and Vibrio splendidus, accepted 24 July 2011. ATCC 33125T, and instead form an evolutionarily distinct clade of Vibrio. Final version published online 6 September Newly isolated strains from coastal seawater in Norway, France, Uruguay, 2011. Mexico, and Japan grouped with the Beijerinck strains, indicating a global dis- DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01177.x tribution for this new clade, designated as the beijerinckii clade. Strains of the beijerinckii clade exhibited little sequence variation for the seven genes and Editor: Alfons Stams approximately 6300 nucleotides examined despite the geographic distances and the more than 80 years separating their isolation. Gram-negative bacteria there- Keywords fore can survive for many decades in liquid storage, and in nature, they do not Martinus W. Beijerinck; historic microbiology; necessarily diverge rapidly over time. luminous bacteria; revival; phylogeny. bacteria as one facet of his work. Beijerinck coined the Introduction name Photobacterium, a genus within which all luminous The ability of certain bacteria to produce light has been bacteria were then grouped, and among other Photobacte- known since 1875, when Pflu¨ger (1875) made the connec- rium species, he named Photobacterium phosphoreum and tion between the luminescence coming from the slime of ‘Photobacterium splendidum’ (Beijerinck, 1889a, b, 1891, fish and bacteria present in the slime (Harvey, 1957; 1916; van Iterson et al., 1940; Robertson, 2003; Robertson Robertson et al., 2011). Following Pflu¨ger’s work, several et al., 2011). The strains now designated as the types of other scientists working in the late 1800s and early P. phosphoreum, ATCC 11040T, and ‘P. splendidum’ (now 1900s isolated and named luminous bacteria, including classified as Vibrio splendidus), ATCC 33125T, however, ‘Bacterium lucens’, ‘Micrococcus phosphorescens’, ‘Micro- were not isolated until 1934 (Ast & Dunlap, 2005) and coccus pflu¨geri’, ‘Bacillus phosphorescens’, and ‘Bacterium 1953 (Reichelt & Baumann, 1973; Baumann et al., 1980), phosphoreum’ (Cohn, 1878; Neush, 1879; Ludwig, 1884; respectively, many years after Beijerinck’s retirement in Fischer, 1887; Molisch, 1912; Harvey, 1952, 1957; Robert- 1921. MICROBIOLOGY ECOLOGY MICROBIOLOGY son et al., 2011). Particularly notable among early Presently, over 20 species of luminous bacteria, all researchers of bacterial luminescence was Martinus W. members of Gammaproteobacteria, are known. Marine Beijerinck, a founder of general microbiology, who car- luminous species are found in Aliivibrio, Photobacterium, ried out research on the physiology of light-emitting Vibrio (Vibrionaceae), and Shewanella (Shewanellaceae), FEMS Microbiol Ecol 78 (2011) 463–472 ª 2011 Federation of European Microbiological Societies Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved 464 M.J. Figge et al. and terrestrial light-producing species are members of Photorhabdus (Enterobacteriaceae) (Dunlap & Kita- Materials and methods Tsukamoto, 2006; Urbanczyk et al., 2007, 2011; Ast et al., Revival of strains 2009; Dunlap, 2009; Yoshizawa et al., 2009). Current understanding of the evolutionary relationships of lumi- Glass ampoules containing approximately 15 mL broth nous bacteria, as well as recent descriptions of new spe- each, sealed in 1924 and 1925, and containing strains of cies, have utilized phylogenetic analysis of multiple, luminous bacteria isolated by M. W. Beijerinck (Fig. 1), functionally independent housekeeping genes, including were obtained from the Netherlands Culture Collection of the 16S rRNA gene, gyrB, pyrH, and recA, among others Bacteria (NCCB). The ampoules, which contained fish (e.g. Ast & Dunlap, 2005; Thompson et al., 2005; Ast extract water [prepared by boiling fish in natural, clean et al., 2007b, 2009; Urbanczyk et al., 2007; Yoshizawa seawater, and adding 10% w/v chalk (CaCO3 powder)] et al., 2009). Particularly useful for resolving closely (Robertson et al., 2011), had been inoculated with lumi- related luminous bacteria is sequence analysis of genes of nous bacteria that were then allowed to grow for 2 days; the bacterial lux operon, luxCDABE, due to their rela- the ampoules were then sealed and stored in the collec- tively rapid sequence divergence compared with most tion at Delft, which became the LMD collection. One of housekeeping genes (Ast & Dunlap, 2004, 2005; Dunlap the original ampoules of ‘P. splendidum’ (designated here et al., 2004; Ast et al., 2007a; Urbanczyk et al., 2007). as strain MWB 29, Table 1) had been opened in 1979 by The recent growth in knowledge of the species diversity J. van der Toorn (pers. commun.), the last curator of the and ecological importance of light-emitting bacteria LMD collection, who revived the culture and re-stored it (Dunlap & Kita-Tsukamoto, 2006; Dunlap, 2009; Urban- in multiple ampoules as LMD 22.30 (=NCCB 22030). czyk et al., 2011) leads to questions about the earliest Three original ampoules sealed in 1924 and 1925 and studies of these bacteria. What species did early microbi- containing bacterial cultures designated here as strains ologists actually study, and how do they compare evolu- MWB 21 (‘P. phosphoreum’), MWB 28 (‘P. splendidum’), tionarily with present-day bacteria? Direct connections to and MWB 30 (‘P. splendidum’) and one of the re-stored studies of luminous bacteria carried out during the late ampoules of MWB 29 (Table 1) were opened in this 1800s and early 1900s, however, are difficult to make. study. Dates of storage of the original cultures, from the Standards for species identification and description have labels on the original ampoules, are: MWB 21, September changed many times in the past century (Sneath, 1992), 1, 1924; MWB 28, September 4, 1924; MWB 29, March and in 1980, many older names lost nomenclatural stand- 19, 1925; MWB 30, December 12, 1925. Approximately ing (Skerman et al., 1980; Sneath, 1986). Furthermore, as early species descriptions typically were based on very few phenotypic traits, meaningful comparisons between cur- rently available strains and bacteria studied a century ago often are difficult to make. A further and very significant limitation in linking the present to the past in microbiol- ogy is that most strains isolated at the end of the 19th and the beginning of the 20th century apparently have been lost due to the lack of effective long-term storage methods at that time. It is therefore often highly prob- lematic to know with certainty what species of bacteria early microbiologists actually studied. While tracing the origin and history of the type strain of P. phosphoreum (Ast & Dunlap, 2005), we learned that glass ampoules containing cultures of luminous bacteria isolated by Beijerinck and stored in the mid-1920s had been retained as part of the historic collection from the Laboratory for Microbiology of the Fig. 1. The original glass ampoules containing cultures of luminous Technische Hogeschool at Delft (LMD). The availability bacteria isolated by and possibly stored by M. W. Beijerinck. The of these ampoules presented an opportunity to attempt cultures were grown up on fish extract water (prepared by boiling fish in seawater) containing 10% w/v chalk (the white material in the to revive these strains and thereby test the possibility ampoules). The ampoule labels indicate: Photobacterium splendidum that direct connections could be made between the ori- September 4, 1924 (designated here as MWB 28) (upper ampoule); gins of general microbiology and 21st century practice and, P. splendidum December 12, 1925 (designated here as MWB of the science. 30) (lower ampoule). ª 2011 Federation of European Microbiological Societies FEMS Microbiol Ecol 78 (2011) 463–472 Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved Revival of

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    10 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us