UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) The kibbutz and Israeli cinema : deterritorializing representation and ideology Kedem, E.M. Publication date 2007 Document Version Final published version Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Kedem, E. M. (2007). The kibbutz and Israeli cinema : deterritorializing representation and ideology. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:01 Oct 2021 The Kibbutz and Israeli Cinema: Deterritorializing Representation and Ideology ACADEMISCH PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Universiteit van Amsterdam op gezag van de Rector Magnificus prof.dr. J.W. Zwemmer ten overstaan van een door het college voor promoties ingestelde commissie, in het openbaar te verdedigen in de Aula der Universiteit op dinsdag 11 september 2007, te 12:00 uur door Eldad Meshulam Kedem geboren te Kibbutz Maagan, Tiberias Faculteit der Geesteswetenschappen Promotiecommissie: promotor: prof.dr. T.P. Elsaesser overige leden: prof.dr. P.P.R.W. Pisters prof.dr. I.E. Zwiep prof.dr. F.P.I.M. van Vree prof.dr. I. Rogoff prof.dr. J.S. de Leeuw The Kibbutz and Israeli Cinema: Deterritorializing Representation and Ideology Eldad Kedem Cover Design: Rivka Shvadron Layout and print by The Open University of Israel, Raanana, Israel. © Eldad Kedem, Tel Aviv, 2007. Contents Introduction 1 Chapter 1 -The Study of Israeli Cinema: Description of the Field 11 1.1 – Symbolic-Realistic Interpretation: Key Concepts 1.2 – Kibbutz, Cinema, History Chapter 2 -The Politics of Representation: The Kibbutz Film Genre 1930-1990 37 2.1 – Settling and Production: 1930-1939 2.2 – Absorption of Survivors and Rites of Passage: 1939-1947 2.3 – Heroism and Frontier: 1948-1964 2.4 – New Genres and the Disappearance of the Kibbutz: 1964-1980 2.5 – Not the Same Fields Any More: 1980-1990 2.6 – Summary Chapter 3 – The Shatterd Dream: 1991-2006 103 3.1 – New Directions in Israeli Cinema 3.2 – The Kibbutz Crisis 3.3 – Utopia and Dystopia, Transience and Exilic Characteristics 3.4 – Summary 3.5 – Towards a New Methodology Chapter 4 - From Representation to Rhizome 149 4.1 – Ideology and Micro-Politics in No Names on the Doors 152 4.1.1 – The Rhizome and the Logic of Multiple Entrances 4.1.2 – Deterritorialization and Immanence 4.1.3 – Parts, Machines and Series 4.1.4 – Seeking a Way Out, Molecular Lins and the Impulse-Image 4.1.5 – Body, Mind and Desiring-Machines 4.2 – From Logos to Nomos in Operation Grandma 172 4.2.1 – Territorial Assemblage and Drifting Lines 4.2.2 – From a Theology of Lack to Affirmative Becoming 4.2.3 – The Refrigerator, the Coffin and the Story behind the Story 4.3 – Repetition and Difference in Mother of the Gevatron 190 4.3.1 – Connection 1: From Action-Image to Relation-Image 4.3.2 – Connection 2: Counter-Actualization & Any-Space-Whatever 4.3.3 – Connection 3: The Struggle of Images and In between Lines 4.3.4 – Connection 4: The Will to Power and the Belief in the Body 4.4 –A Brief Interlude Chapter 5 – Sweet Mud and Thought Without an Image 209 Conclusions 221 Epilog: A Line of Flight… 226 Dutch Summary 227 Acknowledgements 235 Filmography 237 Bibliograpy 252 1 Introduction "Create the opposite dream: know how to create a becoming-minor". (Deleuze and Guattari 1986: 27) The study of Israeli cinema, which developed and crystallized from the late 1970s onward, has been concerned with initial mapping of the field by dividing around four hundred feature films produced in Israel from 1920 until the beginning of the 1990s into distinct periods and genres. The interpretation offered by the research focused on the manner in which Israeli film presented and reflected important topics, problems and conflicts that Israeli society was involved with. At the center of the researchers' attention was the films' ideological significance as well as ideological critique of the films. I refer to this methodology as the “symbolic-realistic" interpretation since it mainly deals with the subject matter and themes of films as a representation and reflection of reality (realism), while attributing symbolic, allegorical or ideological-national implications to the cinematic image. The research I present here begins with this approach and ends with a proposal and application of an alternative methodology for the analysis of Israeli film. I began the research I am presenting here with writing about the history and ideology of around fifty films concerned with the kibbutz, which were produced between 1930 and 2006. These include both films whose entire plot takes place in a kibbutz and films that incorporate a kibbutz character or scenes set in a kibbutz. I wished to examine these films as a separate and unique corpus in Israeli cinema and to consider the reappearance of new films about the kibbutz, in cycles of every few years. My writing was based on the schools of thought I specialized in at the Tel Aviv University Film Department: Semiotics, Structuralism, Post-structuralism, Psychoanalysis and mainly Post-colonialism, methodologies used by prominent Israeli scholars who established the study of Israeli film: Ella Shohat, Judd Ne'eman, Yigal Bursztyn, Nurith Gertz, Moshe Zimmerman, Miri Talmon, Yosefa Loshitzki, Orly Lubin and others. 2 Yet, during the writing of the research study several occurrences led me to another direction and opened a new horizon for me. In the course of my work as a lecturer I gave a class about the kibbutz in Israeli film, where I attempted to intertwine several issues evoked by Gilles Deleuze's philosophy, perhaps as a reaction to the sense of unease with the historical and ideological interpretation and with the focus on the politics of representation and position. In the academic milieu where I operate, I should mention, the kibbutz is considered a priori part of the hegemony, a pivotal pillar of Zionism. In the Israeli version of Post- colonialism the kibbutz is part of the ideological apparatus that repressed and excluded the "other" (the Oriental or the Arab, for instance). In such a climate, it is simply politically incorrect to be concerned with the kibbutz or with films about the kibbutz. I wished, at any rate, to follow the direction offered by Deleuze, that is to progress from the macropolitics to the micropolitics. This endeavor did not succeed, to put it mildly. I felt that Deleuze's writing and particularly his writing about film was probably more appropriate when discussing directors and films that are exceptional and non conventional in terms of style and filmic articulation. Directors such as Eisenstein, Vertov, Bresson, Godard, Antonioni, Rossellini, Hitchcock and many others mentioned in Deleuze's two books dedicated to film. In contrast, I believed that Israeli films are mostly dramas and comedies fashioned through a more conventional cinematic language. Their style usually preserves the flow of continuous space and time, and thus do not naturally allow a connection with Deleuze's writing about cinema. Indeed, colleagues from both my close and distant circles believed that this was a pretentious attempt. I should mention that the choice to use Deleuze's theories in the context of Israeli film is not a self evident one. While there are several researchers from the field of philosophy who are occupied with Deleuze, his ideas are not studied in Israeli film departments at all, and certainly not in relation to Israeli cinema. Whereas one might find a random use of this or the other Deleuzian term, a more comprehensive or deep connection between the theorist and Israeli film is virtually non-existent. One of the main reasons for this omission is the great 3 difficulty in detaching from the ideological issues characterizing the interpretation of national cinema. A reunion with my academic counsel, Professor Thomas Elsaesser, who arrived in Israel as a research associate for several months, enabled me to take up that new direction. Professor Elsaesser was willing to devote his time to watch some films, after which we conducted a few working sessions. He contributed two suggestions that gave my research a new momentum and path: He argued that it was possible, even necessary, to base my research on the dominant methodologies in the study of Israeli film, while still appropriate to try and distance myself from them. He also maintained that it was feasible to link the movies to Deleuze, and furthermore, that it was not imperative to use Deleuze's two books on film, in particular. Rather, it was up to me to discover which of Deleuze's (and Guattari's) numerous and diverse texts might be applicable and relevant to my study. An additional stimulus that reinforced my will to progress toward a new methodological horizon came from a less expected place. While I was in the process of writing this dissertation, the Tel Aviv Museum of Art opened an exhibition entitled "Communal Sleeping: The Group and the Kibbutz in Collective Israeli Consciousness".1 This exhibition featured 24 instillations of fine art, by artists who were born and raised in the kibbutz.