Screening Antibiotics for the Elimination of Bacteria

Screening Antibiotics for the Elimination of Bacteria

AU J.T. 16(1): 7-18 (Jul. 2012) Screening Antibiotics for the Elimination of Bacteria from in vitro Yam Plantlets Sherifah Monilola Wakil and Edith Ijeego Mbah Department of Microbiology, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria E-mail: <[email protected]> Abstract Plant tissue culture technology has been successfully used for the commercial production of pathogen-free plants and for germplasm conservation of rare and endangered species. Clean cultures of aseptically micropropagated shoot cultures of the genus Dioscorea (yam) grown on yam multiplication media are often contaminated with covert bacteria. The bacteria may survive endophytically within these plantlets thereby making the plantlets unusable for in vitro maintenance of germplasm. This study aimed at screening some antibiotics with a view of identifying the best one that can eradicate these endophytic bacteria from yam germplasm maintained in vitro. Eleven antibiotics, at different concentration range, were evaluated on the identified isolates to determine their potential to inhibit these contaminants, using the disk diffusion technique. Single or combined antibiotic treatments effective against the contaminants were also screened for their stability and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC). The results shows that tetracycline combined with rifampicin (TR), streptomycin plus gentamycin (SG), rifampicin (Rn), vancomycin plus streptomycin (VS) at ≥ 125 μg/ml and TVSGR (tetracycline + vancomycin + streptomycin + gentamycin + rifampicin) at ≥ 100 μg/ml were highly bactericidal. These potential bactericidal doses can be further tested in vivo to determine their efficacy in the eradication of bacterial contaminants from the in vitro yam tissue cultured. Keywords: Endophytic bacteria, Discorea species, in vitro susceptibility test, yam germplasm. disease-free conditions, irrespective of the season and weather. This goal can be attained, 1. Introduction if tissues cultured are essentially free from all infecting microorganisms. Aseptic conditions Plant tissue culture refers to the aseptic are usually implied but many plant cultures do growth, multiplication and maintenance of not stay aseptic in vitro and contamination by cells, tissues or organs of plants isolated from micro-organisms, especially bacteria, is a the mother plant, on a defined solid or liquid continuing problem for commercial and media under controlled environment. Basically, research plant micropropagators (Cassells the technique consists of taking a piece of a 2000; Duhem et al. 1988; Debergh and plant referred to as the explants and placing it Vanderschaeghe 1991). in a sterile nutrient where it multiplies Bacterial contamination is a major threat (Odutayo et al. 2007). The formulation of the in plant tissue culture. Plant tissue cultures growth medium depends upon whether it is could harbour bacteria in a totally unsuspecting intended to produce undifferentiated callus manner, either externally in the medium/plant tissue, multiply the number of plantlets, grow or endophytically (Pious 2004). Epiphytic roots or multiply embryo for artificial seed bacteria may lodge in plant structures where (George 1993). The main advantage of tissue disinfectants cannot reach (Gunson and culture technology lies in the production of Spencer-Phillips 1994; Leifert and Waites high quality and uniform planting material that 1992) while endophytic bacteria may be can be multiplied on a year-round basis under localized within the plant at cell junctions and Research Paper 7 AU J.T. 16(1): 7-18 (Jul. 2012) the intercellular spaces of cortical parenchyma elimination of contaminants and the recovery (Gunson and Spencer-Phillips 1994). of healthy plants. Bonev et al. (2008) reported According to Reed et al. (1995), bacterial that the efficacy of antibiotics can be assessed contaminants found at explants initiation, by their ability to suppress bacterial growth, present in explants from collection dates and described by the MIC, or by their ability to kill resistant to surface disinfection are likely to be bacteria, characterized by the minimal endophytic. Both surface sterilization-resistant bactericidal concentration (MBC). Hence, micro-organisms and endophytic micro- antibiotic screening remains the primary organisms (Cassells 2001) may survive in the requisite for tackling the covert contamination plant material for several subculture cycles and problem. Therefore, the objectives of this over extended periods of time without research was to screen a selected range of expressing symptoms in the tissue or visible antibiotics against the three identified yam signs in the medium (Van den Houwe and tissue culture bacterial contaminants Swennen 2000). Presence of these bacteria in (Burkholderia spp., Luteibacter rhizovicinus the cultures is highly undesirable due to and Bacillus cereus) and to determine the adverse effects on growth (Leifert and Waites bactericidal activities of the most effective 1992; Thomas 2004), lack of reproducibility of antibiotics. tissue-culture protocols (Thomas 2004) ramifications in cell cultures (Horsch and King 1983), possibility of carrying pathogens 2. Materials and Methods (Cooke et al. 1992), potential risk to in vitro gene banks (Van den Houwe and Swennen 2.1 Test Organisms 2000) and a barrier for safe exchange of germplasm (Salih et al. 2001). These factors Three bacterial isolates obtained from reduce the potential reliability of plant contaminated in vitro yam plantlets by the cell/tissue-culture systems (Cassells 2001; pathology team and identified as Burkholderia Thomas 2004). spp. (IMI No 395525), Luteibacter rhizovicinus The major challenges that yam (IMI No 395527), and Bacillus cereus (IMI No production is facing using tissue culture 395528) by the Commonwealth Agricultural techniques are that of endophytic bacterial Bureaux (CABI) were used for the study. All contamination. Burkholderia spp., Luteibacter isolates were cultivated by streaking onto Muller-Hinton agar medium (MHA) and rhizovicinus and Bacillus cereus are the major o bacteria contaminants implicated in the Yam incubating at 35-37 C for 18-24 hours. Tissue Culture at the Institute of Tropical Agriculture Ibadan (IITA), Nigeria. These 2.2 Antimicrobial Agents bacteria have been found to be plant-associated bacteria (Kotiranta et al. 2000; Coenye and A total of eleven antibiotics, obtained Vandamme 2003; Johansen et al. 2005; from Sigma-Aldrich, Corporation (Poole, UK), Janssen 2006; and Compant et al. 2008) which were used for the preliminary screening infect cultures when explants materials from (ampicillin, penicillin G, tetracycline, the field are not properly disinfected/ vancomycin, streptomycin, rifampicin, decontaminated. In addition, Bacillus cereus gentamycin, bacitracin, cefotaxime, has also been reported as opportunistic human trimethoprim and carbenicillin). All stock pathogen (Hoffmaster et al. 2006) which is solutions were prepared from reagent-grade always derived from the plant propagator. powders to produce 1-mg/ml solutions by using Several antibiotics are frequently used in the solvents and diluents suggested in Clinical plant biotechnology to eliminate endogenous Laboratory Standards Institute document bacteria in plant tissue culture although M100-S17 (NCCLS 2001). Stock solutions were filter-sterilized (pore 0.22 µm, millipore), aaccording to Cornu and Michel (1987), o knowledge of the effect of antibiotics, on both stored at -20 C, and used within the bacteria and plants is important for the recommended period. Research Paper 8 AU J.T. 16(1): 7-18 (Jul. 2012) Antibiotic paper discs of different known seeded plates. All samples were tested in concentrations were prepared by soaking sterile triplicates. The inoculated plates were sealed paper discs with appropriate antibiotic and incubated at 35-37oC for 18-24 hours in an concentrations derived from a two-fold dilution inverted position. The diameters of the of the stock solutions. The method employed inhibition zones around the discs were for impregnating antibiotics to discs was the measured and recorded. MIC was defined as immersion method. It was assumed by the the lowest concentration of antibiotic to inhibit World Health Organization (WHO) and bacterial growth. NCCLS that a paper disc could absorb 0.02 ml Five antibiotics (gentamycin, of the solutions (NCCLS 1984). The wet vancomycin, tetracycline, rifampicin and inoculated antibiotic paper discs plate were streptomycin) selected based on their sealed with Para films and dried inside an effectiveness in the susceptibility test incubator at 35-37oC. conducted were combined together as TVSGR (tetracycline + vancomycin + streptomycin + 2.3 Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing gentamycin + rifampicin) and also in the combinations of two forming ten antibiotic Prior to the antibiotic susceptibility test, combination treatments: tetracycline + each of the three isolates (Burkholderia spp., vancomycin (TV), tetracycline + streptomycin Luteibacter rhizovicinus and Bacillus cereus) (TS), tetracycline + gentamycin (TG), grown on a Muller-Hinton agar plate for 18-24 vancomycin + streptomycin (VS), vancomycin hours at 35-37oC was standardized. Bacterial + gentamycin (VG), vancomycin + rifampicin standardization was done by suspending well (VR), streptomycin + gentamycin (SG), isolated colonies of the same morphology in a streptomycin + rifampicin (SR) and test tube containing sterile normal saline and gentamycin + rifampicin (GR). All the mixed until it attained the turbidity of 0.5 antibiotics

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    12 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us