Seismic Response of Submerged Cohesionless Slopes

Seismic Response of Submerged Cohesionless Slopes

Missouri University of Science and Technology Scholars' Mine International Conferences on Recent Advances 2001 - Fourth International Conference on in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Soil Dynamics Engineering and Soil Dynamics 29 Mar 2001, 4:00 pm - 6:00 pm Seismic Response of Submerged Cohesionless Slopes Giovanni Biondi Università di Catania, Italy Ernesto Cascone Università di Messina, Italy Michele Maugeri Università di Catania, Italy Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/icrageesd Part of the Geotechnical Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Biondi, Giovanni; Cascone, Ernesto; and Maugeri, Michele, "Seismic Response of Submerged Cohesionless Slopes" (2001). International Conferences on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics. 5. https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/icrageesd/04icrageesd/session07/5 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. This Article - Conference proceedings is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars' Mine. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Conferences on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics by an authorized administrator of Scholars' Mine. This work is protected by U. S. Copyright Law. Unauthorized use including reproduction for redistribution requires the permission of the copyright holder. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SEISMIC RESPONSE OF SUBMERGED COHESIONLESS SLOPES Giovanni Biondi Ernest0 Cascone Michele Maugeri Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile ed Dipartimento di Costruzioni e Tecnologie Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile ed Ambientale, Universitb di Catania - Italy Avanzate, Universita di Messina- Italy Ambientale, Universita di Catania - Italy ABSTRACT Seismic slope stability analysis is a topic of great interest in geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering particularly in seismic area in fact the occurrence of earthquake induced landslides is documented in many recent post-earthquake damage report (Japan 1993- 199 Greece 1995, Turkey 1999). Generally saturated slopes of loose sand or silty-sand and earth dams and embankment resting on loo cohesionless soil deposit are highly susceptibleto liquefaction-induced damage and during strong earthquake several landslides caused soil liquefaction may occur. In this paper a numerical model to evaluate seismic response of submerged cohesionless slopes is describe Slope stability conditions are evaluated taking into account the inertial effect of seismic forces and the earthquake induced pore pressur which reduce soil effective stress state. Displacement analysis has been performed using an extension of Newmark’s sliding block mod for rotational failure mechanism and taking into account the reduction of slope critical acceleration due to changes in pore pressure Applying the proposed model a numerical analysishas been performed in order to point out those parameters which mostly affect seis slope response and some usef%lstability charts are provided. INTRODUCTION conditions are evaluated taking into account the inertial sei effects and the earthquake induced pore pressureswhich re The stability of continental shelf and slopes is a topic of great the soil effective stress state and consequently affect the s interest in the field of near shore and off-shore constructions, stability conditions. particularly in seismic areas;in fact the occurrence of earthquake Both for translational and rotational failure mechanisma rigo induced landslides on those geotechnical structures is solution to evaluate seismic behaviour of natural slopes is no documented in many post-earthquake damage report. available becauseof the great number of parameterswhich c During recent large earthquakein Japan(1993, 1995) and Turkey play an important role on seismic slope response. Conseque (1999) settlements and lateral spreading in the order of several simplified method based on approximate models are o hundreds of centimetres, and consequently several damage on preferred to more rigorous methods which are less practical structures has been observed. As a result of the 1995 Hyogo-ken more time-consuming. Thus seismic slope response is curre Nambu earthquake, wide spread occurrence of lateral spreading performed referring to Newmark’s sliding block model. of the ground, resulting from soil liquefaction, has been observed simple model, although approximate, gives much (Ishihara, 1997); in the 1999 Kokaeli earthquake there were information than the classical pseudo-static analysis and requl several sites of land loss into the sea along south coastal line of a smaller modelling effort than FEM analysis,all the Izmit Bay which appearedto have been caused by submarine the occurrence of permanent displacementunder landslides (Ishihara et al, 2000). During the Kozani-Grevena For the case of translational failure mechanism earthquake (1995) damageswere observed to the Rimnio bridge model was firstly extended by Sarma (1975) to i embankment;lateral spreadingwas induced by liquefaction of the of the cyclic pore water pressure changes; recently Kra silty sand layer where the embankment was founded and the Arduino (1999) have shown the importance of pore observed horizontal displacement was 0.8 to 2.0m (Tika & pressure changes on permanent seismic displacement for Pitilakis, 1999). Generally saturated slopes of loose sand or silty- slopes using an energy-basedmodel and diflkren sand and earth dams and embankments resting on loose laws. Moreover for gentle slopes with translational cohesionless soil deposit are highly susceptible to liquefaction- mechanism, Biondi et al. (1999 a) have shown that eart induced damage and during strong earthquake several landslides induced pore pressureundoubtedly affect slope stability co caused by soil liquefaction may occur. and play an important role in the accumulation of Based on this observation a numerical model has been developed displacements. Particularly for cohesionless soils, to evaluate seismic and post-seismic behaviour of cohesionless undrained conditions show liquefiable behaviour, a sl saturated slopes with rotational failure mechanism: slope stability reduction in shear strength may occur depending on s factors: the initial effective stress state, the earthquake induced SEISMIC STABILITY CONDITION shear stress time history and the soil relative density. A stability analysis taking into account all these factors should thereby be Slope stability is evaluated using the Bishop’s modified method performed; in fiict even for gentle slopes the failure condition may extended to take into account pseudostatically the soil inertia be achieved with large displacements (Biondi et al. 1999 b). effect due to the seismic excitation; however, any other slice In this paper a displacement analysis has been performed using method can be used consistently. Usually the earthquake induced an extension of Newmark’s sliding block model for rotational acceleration is considered to be horizontal; however several failure mechanism and taking into account the reduction in shear studies show that, both for circular and translational failure strength due to the pore pressure build-up. The proposed model mechanism, a stability analysis in which the vertical component of is capable to point out the influence of the above mentioned seismic acceleration is neglected may result unconsetvative. parameters which affect seismic and post-seismic slope response Accordingly an acceleration vector inclined of an angle w to the in terms of permanent displacements. horizontal was applied in the centre of gravity of each slope slice. Referring to figure 1 the slope static safety factor F, and the slope seismic safety factor Fdo may be evaluated using the following GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS expressions: The static and dynamic stability analysis is based on the F = &[(F -ui.bi)m@l*M s 0) assumption of plane strain condition; the potential failure surface . sina,] and the slope safety factor, both for static and seismic conditions, ;[F are evaluated considering for the soil a plastic behaviour and the Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion. Figure 1 shows the geometrical F”= ~[(~.(l-~~,.)-Ui.b,). tan&]*@) scheme of the slope considered in the analysis. The phreatic d (2) surface is defined by Dupuit’s formula for two fixed points (a, b) represented in figure 1. 11 As shown by Spencer (1978) and Chang et al. (1984) the failure tan(6 M=(seca,) l+tana,.----- (3) mechanism described by a circular surface is the most critical for I( F 1 slopes subjected to lateral acceleration; following this result a where, for the i-th slice, A4i represents the iterative factor circular failure surface is assumed in the analysis and the slope is (evaluated for F=F, in equation (2) and for F=Fdo in equation supposed to rotate, as a rigid block, along it. (3)), Wi represents the total weight, ui represents the pore During seismic excitation the slope safety factor, evaluated as the pressure value a&ing in static conditions, c ‘=Oand # are the ratio between the resisting and the overturning moment, changes Mohr-Coulomb shear strength parameters, bi is the length of the due to the inertia forces induced by seismic excitation and to slice base inclined of an angle ai to the horizontal, Kmrashand K-, cyclic degradation of soil shear strength. A more reliable criterion are the two components of the maximum value of earthquake to evaluate seismic stability and post-seismic

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    7 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us