Evaluating Dental Clearance Prior to Total Joint Replacement at the Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center: One Answer, Ten More Questions

Evaluating Dental Clearance Prior to Total Joint Replacement at the Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center: One Answer, Ten More Questions

Arthroplasty Evaluating Dental Clearance Prior to Total Joint Replacement at the Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center: One Answer, Ten More Questions Lori Jia, BS1 Introduction Patients were thus characterized as follows: Kendall M. Masada, MD2 Periprosthetic infection is a dreaded • Edentulous (those with no teeth were not Jacob C. Harris, BA1 complication of total joint replacement, and subject to further screening) Vincent M. Moretti, MD2 surgeons should take all reasonable steps to • Cleared by VA dentist Eric L. Hume, MD2 avoid it. One possible source of infection is • Periodontal disease/significant tooth decay Joseph Bernstein, MD2 periodontal bacteria. Because of this possible discovered by VA dentist 1 Perelman School of Medicine association, some surgeons maintain that all • Non-periodontal disease discovered by VA University of Pennsylvania patients should be evaluated and treated for dentist 2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery periodontal disease and tooth decay before • Ultimately cleared by private dentist (this University of Pennsylvania undergoing arthroplasty—so-called “dental includes both “no disease” and “disease clearance.” treated by private dentist”) The practice of dental clearance is somewhat controversial, as the prevalence of periodontal disease and significant tooth decay might be Results too low to justify it. As noted in a recent review, There were 151 patients who underwent “dental disease has long been anecdotally total knee or total hip arthroplasty in 2019. associated with increased periprosthetic joint There were 43 patients ultimately cleared by infections, although case-control studies do not their private dentist and 25 who had no teeth, support this relationship.”1 leaving 83 patients to be locally evaluated by VA At the Philadelphia Veterans Affairs (VA) dentists. Medical Center, dental clearance has traditionally Of these, 44 were cleared and 39 failed—38 been part of the routine preoperative checklist. with periodontal disease or significant tooth Still, requiring dental clearance has been decay and one with leukoplakia. complicated by the fact that many veterans are not eligible for full dental services. As such, Discussion clearance is performed on an ad hoc basis and We discovered a staggeringly high rate of surgery is not scheduled until clearance can be periodontal disease within our VA cohort. obtained. Excluding those who went to a private dentist We therefore sought to determine whether a or who were exempt from clearance because more formal system is needed, by measuring the they had no teeth, 47% of patients failed their yield of these examinations: namely, the rate of dental clearance examination. By contrast, a discovering pathology. Our working hypothesis study conducted by Tokarski et al. in our same was that the yield from such examinations would city and using similar methodology found that be sufficiently high to justify their continuance. only 35 out of 300 patients (11.6%) failed.2 (The chi-square statistic for this 35/300 vs. 39/83 Methods discrepancy is 52.03; the associated p-value is A list of patients who underwent total knee or ,0.00001.) total hip arthroplasty in the calendar year 2019 Even if the 43 patients examined by their was generated. The patient record for all such private dentist were folded back into our patients was then examined to determine the calculations (contributing an additional 5 outcome of the dental clearance examination. positives and 38 negatives, as implied by the Notably, patients who had a dentist outside 11.6% prevalence rate found by the Tokarski et of the VA health system (“private dentists”) were al. study), the resulting failure rate, 35%, is still allowed to obtain clearance from their outside higher than the failure rate reported by any practitioner. study of the general population. 192 UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL EVALUATING DENTAL CLEARANCE PRIOR TO TOTAL JOINT REPLACEMENT AT THE PHILADELPHIA VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER: ONE ANSWER, TEN MORE QUESTIONS 193 As a practical matter, the results of our pilot study confirm than abdominal liposuction will reduce the cardiac risks of the need for continued dental clearance at our medical belly fat.3 In both cases, only the marker, not the underlying center. If nothing else, requiring dental clearance prior to process, is being addressed. Whether edentulous patients total joint replacement and addressing dental problems should be considered in the “cleared” category or more aptly preoperatively should reduce the need for dental procedures in the “treated periodontal disease and tooth decay” category in the immediate aftermath of surgery. Given that transient is not known. A study of edentulous patients’ outcomes might bacteremia is associated with dental procedures and that elucidate the role of active versus prior oral disease as a risk there is persistent localized hyperemia around replaced joints, factor. avoiding dental procedures in the first few years after surgery should minimize the risk of periprosthetic infection. 4. If the rate of periodontal disease is so much higher among Further, while the results of a single year’s cohort at a single veterans, does this suggest that veterans are so different institution are hardly definitive, they do serve as a springboard from the general population that veteran outcome studies to further investigation. We propose that there are at least ten cannot inform general policies? questions still unanswered by the results presented here: In 2002, a now classic paper by Moseley et al. studied the use of arthroscopy for arthritis and found that “sham surgery” 1. Is there a more efficient way to screen for dental was equally effective.4 The pushback from orthopaedic clearance outside of requiring all patients to see a dentist surgeons was harsh.5 A common form of rebuttal can be preoperatively? paraphrased as “well, that study was done at the VA.” While It may be possible to identify low-risk patients through that comment is factually accurate, what might be questioned a series of questions, such that not all patients are required is the implication. Namely, “well, that study was done at the to see a dentist prior to surgery. For example, patients who VA and the patients there are so different that VA results avoid tobacco, visit their dentist regularly, and report no pain have no meaning outside of the VA system.” It is known that or sensitivity when chewing are less likely to have clinically the veterans who seek care at the VA are more likely to be significant periodontal disease and tooth decay. However, male, with greater comorbid conditions, a higher prevalence the specific questions needed to reliably identify low-risk of smoking, and a lower socioeconomic status.6 Outcomes patients (akin to the Ottawa Ankle Rules to obviate the need studies explicitly account for these known confounders. At for radiographs in the Emergency Room) are yet to be defined. the very least, if the prevalence of periodontal disease is much higher among veterans, future VA outcomes studies (on any 2. Are the risks of periodontal disease and tooth decay fully topic) might have to control for this variable as well. mitigated by screening and treatment? It is reasonable to assume that dental clearance reduces 5. What are the true costs of dental evaluation and treatment? the risk of periprosthetic infection caused by oral disease. As noted, dental clearance at our medical center is However, it is not known whether the overall infection performed on an ad hoc basis. Patients are sent out for rate (or more broadly, the overall complication rate) is clearance and treatment [see below] without formal markedly lower. For one, periodontal disease and tooth decay budgetary authority. In order to obtain the formal authority may reflect medical comorbidities, such as diabetes, that to continue dental clearance officially, it would be necessary themselves pose significant postoperative risk. For another, to document the costs and benefits. We know that nearly longstanding periodontal disease may induce chronic low half of our patient cohort needs local clearance, and that grade inflammation whose harmful effects are not mitigated within that cohort, nearly half fail their examination. What completely by cleaning the mouth. Moreover, if any teeth are we do not know is the cost of getting those failed patients retained, the very processes that led to periodontal disease ready for surgery and the benefits of complications avoided. and tooth decay in the first place may affect these remaining Although it would be ethically impermissible to conduct a teeth in the future. Finally, the presence of periodontal disease randomized controlled trial in which some patients are not and tooth decay may reflect poor hygiene habits that will sent for clearance—a method that would define costs and affect a total joint replacement. As such, we would be hesitant benefits precisely—simple models can be created to estimate to operate on a patient who will not “take care” of his or her the number of periprosthetic infections that can be avoided prosthesis, and periodontal disease and tooth decay may be a with each clearance. With that, some estimate of the dollars marker for this issue. saved by a clearance program can be estimated. 3. How do edentulous patients compare to the others? 6. Is it possible to reduce the prevalence of periodontal The standard protocol, by which edentulous patients are disease and tooth decay by implementing an “upstream” per se cleared, assumes that “no teeth = no periodontal disease intervention? or tooth decay.” The logic is simple: missing teeth cannot In the realm of cost-benefit analysis, one can further consider be diseased. However, if oral disease does indeed reflect not only the two possible treatment paths (clearance versus comorbidities or behavioral/socioeconomic confounders, then no clearance), but also the costs and benefits of an option that removing teeth will no more reduce the risks of oral disease includes an intervention. Ideally, periodontal disease would be VOLUME 31, JUNE 2021 194 JIA ET AL.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    4 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us