The Genetic Structure of Crossbills Suggests Rapid Diversification with Little Niche Conservatism

The Genetic Structure of Crossbills Suggests Rapid Diversification with Little Niche Conservatism

bs_bs_banner Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2013, ••, ••–••. With 5 figures The genetic structure of crossbills suggests rapid diversification with little niche conservatism MATS BJÖRKLUND1, DANIEL ALONSO2 and PIM EDELAAR1,3,4* 1Department of Animal Ecology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18D, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden 2Aranzadi Ringing Scheme, Aranzadi Sciences Society, Zorroagagaina 11, 20014 San Sebastián, Spain 3Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemical Engineering, University Pablo de Olavide, Ctra. Utrera km. 1, S-41013 Sevilla, Spain 4Department of Conservation Biology, Estación Biológica de Doñana – CSIC, S-41092 Sevilla, Spain Received 13 December 2012; revised 12 February 2013; accepted for publication 12 February 2013 Conservatism of ecological niches can cause geographical ranges or the formation of new species to be constrained, and might be expected in situations where strong trade-offs result in ecological specialization. Here we address the flexibility of resource use in European crossbills by comparing the ecological and genetic similarities between four Mediterranean and three northern European crossbill populations, all specialized in feeding on a different resource. We used sequence data of one mitochondrial and two nuclear genes from between 211 and 256 individuals. The northern crossbills were genetically too similar to infer which population was more related to the southern ones. Crossbills from the island of Mallorca showed genetic signatures of a stable and isolated population, supporting their past treatment as a locally (co)evolving taxon, and seem to have evolved from an ecologically distinct ancestor. Previous studies in other populations also suggest that genetic similarity does not predict morphological and resource similarity. We estimate that the divergence of all western European crossbills has occurred within the last 11 000 years. Overall, it appears that crossbills can diversify rapidly and with little niche conservatism, but that such potentially reproductively isolated specialists are evolutionarily short-lived. © 2013 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2013, ••, ••–••. ADDITIONAL KEYWORDS: adaptive radiation – Loxia curvirostra – measures of genetic differentiation – reproductive isolation. INTRODUCTION for phylogenetic conservatism in an important eco- logical trait (Wiens et al., 2010). However, equally The tendency of species and clades to retain their strong examples of niche flexibility have been encoun- niches and related ecological traits over time is called tered, for example during adaptive radiation niche conservatism (Wiens et al., 2010). The flexibility (reviewed in Schluter, 2000). While niche conserva- with which niches change over time and can be tism could be present for several reasons, one would adapted to local (incl. anthropogenic) changes or new predict it to be relatively stronger in more specialized opportunities can have great impact on population taxa, as stronger specialization suggests stronger persistence and rates of diversification, speciation, underlying trade-offs among functional traits. and geographical range evolution (reviewed in Wiens The Holarctic avian genus Loxia (crossbills) might et al., 2010). In many different areas of ecology and serve as an interesting test case of this expectation. conservation biology researchers have found evidence These birds live almost exclusively on seeds of coni- fers, which they extract from between closed cone scales with their curved and crossed mandibles. *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] However, conifers differ in traits such as cone size, © 2013 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2013, ••, ••–•• 1 2 M. BJÖRKLUND ET AL. scale thickness, and seed size, and therefore no single best considered an allopatric sister species of the bill type performs best on all types of cones: larger, Parrot crossbill. deeper bills are better for extracting seeds from cones Populations in southern Europe break this general with strong seed defences but are less efficient on pattern of a single, different conifer species as the smaller cones with weaker seed defences (Benkman, food resource for each crossbill species. Local popula- 1993, 2003). Because of these strong foraging trade- tions of common crossbills around the Mediterranean offs, it appears that each crossbill taxon is specialized Basin feed on four different species of pine (Aleppo in a single kind of conifer (i.e. has a different niche), pine Pinus halepensis, Scots pine P. sylvestris, black and in turn that crossbill diversity and speciation is pine P. nigra and mountain pine P. uncinata). This ultimately driven by conifer diversity (Benkman, could mean that the specialization on a single 2003; Edelaar & Benkman, 2006; Edelaar, 2008a; resource in crossbills is not a hard rule, or that cryptic Edelaar et al., 2012). (incipient) species could be included within the However, if bill morphology and cone morphology common crossbill. Indeed, these Mediterranean are so tightly linked, does this then imply that it is populations using different resources show some asso- difficult and rare to switch between resources, and ciated differentiation in adaptive morphology, vocali- that resource switches occur mainly between very zations, and genetic markers (Massa, 1987; Cramp & similar types of resources? For the North American Perrins, 1994; Edelaar et al., 2012), and some island crossbill taxa, the results from Parchman, Benkman populations have received subspecific recognition & Britch (2006) show that genetically closely related (Cramp & Perrins, 1994). taxa can have very different bill sizes, suggesting that In this paper we take some steps towards unravel- crossbills are able to switch between very different ling the evolutionary history of crossbills in Europe. resources. Moreover, the very low levels of genetic Specifically, we contrast a scenario where switching divergence are compatible with the recent divergence between resources is relatively hard and mostly of taxa, possibly mostly post-Pleistocene, suggesting occurs between similar resources (as the existence of that resource switching is also relatively frequent. In strong trade-offs predicts), with a scenario where addition, the very thin-billed White-winged crossbill switching between resources is relatively easy, includ- (L. leucoptera) has colonized the island of Hispaniola ing between dissimilar resources (as earlier empirical and switched to a strongly defended pine, resulting in studies suggest). We do this because both scenarios the evolution of the thick-billed Hispaniolan crossbill have been proposed to explain the origin of the pine- (L. megaplaga; Parchman, Benkman & Mezquida, feeding Mediterranean crossbills (Murray, 1978; 2007). While the thickness of its bill has probably Knox, 1990; Tyrberg, 1991). Under the first scenario it evolved partly due to an arms race between crossbills is thought that pine-feeding crossbills have had a and pines which may have had over 300 000 years to more or less continuous distribution across Europe develop (Parchman et al., 2007), the resource switch during times of glaciation but that they were geo- from a thin-scaled, small-coned spruce to a thick- graphically separated by the spread of broad-leaved scaled, large-coned pine is striking. Overall then, it trees across central Europe during the warmer inter- appears that switches between resources of a consid- glaciations. Under the second scenario it is thought erable difference have appeared frequently in Ameri- that the spruce-feeding common crossbill invaded can crossbills, and may have taken relatively little Europe west of the Ural Mountains after the last time. glaciation (with the spread of Norway spruce) and We address here the generality of this pattern in that upon reaching Mediterranean areas it shifted European crossbills. In mainland Europe there are resource type and started to utilize the different three taxonomically recognized and morphologically pines. Both hypotheses have some empirical support: distinct species occurring in the north. Similar to the Mediterranean pine-feeding crossbills are vocally situation in North America, each of these species more similar to the other pine-feeding crossbills from appears to be specialized on a single conifer: the the north (Summers & Jardine, 2005; Förschler & two-barred crossbill (L. bifasciata) on Siberian larch Kalko, 2009), but morphologically more similar to the (Larix siberica), the parrot crossbill (L. pytyopsitta- northern spruce-feeding common crossbill (Cramp & cus) on Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris), and the common Perrins, 1994) which moreover regularly irrupts to crossbill (L. curvirostra) on Norway spruce (Picea Mediterranean areas (Tellería, Asensio & Díaz, 1999; abies) (Cramp & Perrins, 1994). In addition, the Scot- Borrás et al., 2010) and probably has done so in the tish crossbill (L. scotica) of Scotland is considered a past. separate species (Summers, Dawson & Phillips, As vocalizations and morphology paint opposite pic- 2007), and mostly thought to have evolved as a spe- tures and may show patterns of recent selection cialist on Scots pine. In view of vocalizations, mating instead of evolutionary history, here we use genetic patterns, distribution, and resource use it is perhaps data to test these two scenarios. Previous studies on © 2013 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society,

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    15 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us