CDL Core Files 2015-2016 2015-2016 CDL Core Files Researched by Hanna Nasser, Alix Dahl and Mike Baxter-Kauf (with contributions from Cydney Edwards, Roman Motley, Travis Ormsby, and David Song) Resolved: The United States federal government should substantially curtail its domestic surveillance 1 CDL Core Files 2015-2016 Core Files Table of Contents 1/4 *** STINGRAY AFFIRMATIVE 9 STINGRAY AFFIRMATIVE SUMMARY 10 STINGRAY 1AC—INHERENCY 11 STINGRAY 1AC—PLAN 12 STINGRAY 1AC—DEMOCRACY ADVANTAGE 13 STINGRAY 1AC—RACIAL PROFILING ADVANTAGE 15 STINGRAY 1AC—RACIAL PROFILING ADVANTAGE 16 STINGRAY 1AC—SOLVENCY 17 2AC INHERENCY—STINGRAY NOW 18 2AC DEMOCRACY ADVANTAGE—STINGRAY VIOLATES 21 2AC DEMOCRACY ADVANTAGE—COPS LIE 23 2AC DEMOCRACY ADVANTAGE—PRIVACY KEY TO DEMOCRACY 24 2AC RACIAL PROFILING ADVANTAGE—STINGRAY PROFILES 25 2AC RACIAL PROFILING ADVANTAGE—IMPACTS 26 2AC SOLVENCY—FCC GOOD 27 2AC ANSWERS TO: FCC CAN’T DECERTIFY 28 2AC ANSWERS TO: TERROR DISADVANTAGE 29 2AC ANSWERS TO CRIME DISADVANTAGE 31 *** STINGRAY NEGATIVE 32 1NC ANSWERS TO: INHERENCY—STATUS QUO SOLVES 33 1NC ANSWERS TO: DEMOCRACY ADVANTAGE 35 1NC ANSWERS TO: RACIAL PROFILING ADVANTAGE 36 1NC ANSWERS TO: SOLVENCY 37 2NC/1NR ANSWERS TO: SOLVENCY—FCC CAN’T DO IT 38 2NC/1NR ANSWERS TO: SOLVENCY—CIRCUMVENTION 39 TERROR DISADVANTAGE LINKS 40 *** NATIONAL SECURITY LETTERS AFFIRMATIVE 42 2 CDL Core Files 2015-2016 NATIONAL SECURITY LETTERS SUMMARY 43 1AC 1/6: INHERENCY 44 1AC 3/6: PRIVACY 46 1AC 5/6: RACISM 48 ANSWERS TO: NATIONAL SECURITY DISADVANTAGE 50 ANSWERS TO: NATIONAL SECURITY DISADVANTAGE 51 ANSWERS TO: CRIME DISADVANTAGE 52 2AC EXTENSIONS: PRIVACY 53 2AC EXTENSIONS: RACISM 54 *** NATIONAL SECURITY LETTERS NEGATIVE 55 1NC SOLVENCY 56 1NC RACISM HARMS 57 1NC PRIVACY HARMS 58 1NC PRIVACY HARMS 59 *** DRONE AFFIRMATIVE 60 1AC 61 2AC ADVANTAGE FRONTLINES 70 2AC INHERENCY 71 2AC INHERENCY- ANSWERS TO: OBAMA REGULATIONS 72 2AC CIVIL LIBERTIES 73 2AC CREDIBILITY 74 2AC INNOVATION 75 2AC SOLVENCY 76 ANSWERS TO: DRONES BAD DISADVANTAGE 77 2AC DRONES BAD DISADVANTAGE 78 ANSWERS TO: BAN DRONES COUNTERPLAN 80 2AC BAN DRONES COUNTERPLAN 81 *** DRONE NEGATIVE 83 1NC ADVANTAGE FRONTLINES 84 1NC INHERENCY FRONTLINE 85 1NC CIVIL LIBERTIES FRONTLINE 86 1NC CREDIBILITY FRONTLINE 87 1NC INNOVATION FRONTLINE 89 1NC SOLVENCY FRONTLINE 91 2NC/1NR ADVANTAGE FRONTLINE EXTENSIONS 92 2NC/1NR INHERENCY 93 2NC/1NR CIVIL LIBERTIES 94 2NC/1NR CREDIBILITY 95 2NC/1NR INNOVATION 97 2NC/1NR SOLVENCY 98 ADVANTAGE FRONTLINE EXTENSIONS 99 ANSWERS TO: INHERENCY- EXTENSIONS 100 ANSWERS TO: CIVIL LIBERTIES- IMPACT FRAMING 101 ANSWERS TO: CIVIL LIBERTIES- ALTERNATE CAUSALITIES 102 ANSWERS TO: CREDIBILITY- GLOBAL WARMING IMPACT 103 ANSWERS TO: CREDIBILITY- HEGEMONY IMPACT 104 ANSWERS TO: SOLVENCY- EXTENSIONS 105 DRONES BAD DISADVANTAGE 106 1NC DRONES BAD DISADVANTAGE 107 3 CDL Core Files 2015-2016 **UNIQUENESS- DRONES BAD DISADVANTAGE 110 2NC/1NR ANSWERS TO: NON-UNIQUE 111 2NC/1NR UNIQUENESS WALL- DRONES BAD DISADVANTAGE 112 **LINK- DRONES BAD DISADVANTAGE 113 2NC/1NR ANSWERS TO: NO LINK 114 2NC/1NR LINK WALL- DRONES BAD DISADVANTAGE 115 **IMPACT- DRONES BAD DISADVANTAGE 117 ANSWERS TO: DRONES SOLVE TERRORISM 118 ANSWERS TO: NO IMPACT TO TERRORISM 119 BAN DRONES COUNTERPLAN 120 1NC BAN DRONES COUNTERPLAN 121 2NC/1NR BAN DRONES COUNTERPLAN 123 2NC/1NR BAN DRONES COUNTERPLAN- OVERVIEW 124 2NC/1NR- ANSWERS TO: PERM DO BOTH 125 2NC/1NR- ANSWERS TO: NO SOLVENCY 126 2NC/1NR- ANSWERS TO: ADD-ON 127 **CRITICAL SCHOOL SURVEILLANCE- AFFIRMATIVE 129 1AC 130 2AC ANSWERS TO: SAFETY DISADVANTAGE 136 2AC ANSWERS TO: FRAMEWORK 137 2AC ON-CASE FRONTLINE 139 **CRITICAL SCHOOL SURVEILLANCE- NEG 140 1NC FRAMEWORK 141 **SAFETY DISADVANTAGE 144 1NC ON-CASE FRONTLINE 146 ***TOPICALITY NEGATIVE 148 1NC VIOLATIONS 149 **FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 150 1NC DRONE SURVEILLANCE- “FEDERAL GOVERNMENT” VIOLATION 151 1NC STINGRAY- “FEDERAL GOVERNMENT” VIOLATION 153 1NC CRITICAL SECURITY- “FEDERAL GOVERNMENT” VIOLATION 155 **CURTAIL ≠ ABOLISH 156 1NC SECURITY LETTERS- CURTAIL ≠ ABOLISH 157 2NC/1NR/1NR BLOCKS 158 **2NC/1NR/1NR COMPETING INTERPRETATIONS 159 2NC/1NR- ANSWERS TO: REASONABILITY 160 ***”FEDERAL GOVERNMENT” VIOLATION 161 2NC/1NR/2NR- “FEDERAL GOVERNMENT”- EXTENSIONS 162 2NC/1NR/2NR- “ITS”- EXTENSIONS 163 **2NC/1NR/1NR DRONE AFFIRMATIVE 164 2NC/1NR DRONE AFFIRMATIVE- “FEDERAL GOVERNMENT”- OVERVIEW 165 2NC/1NR DRONE AFFIRMATIVE- “FEDERAL GOVERNMENT”- VIOLATION 166 **2NC/1NR/1NR STINGRAY AFFIRMATIVE 167 2NC/1NR DRONE AFFIRMATIVE- “FEDERAL GOVERNMENT”- OVERVIEW 168 2NC/1NR STINGRAY AFFIRMATIVE- “FEDERAL GOVERNMENT”- VIOLATION 169 **2NC/1NR/1NR CRITICAL SECURITY AFFIRMATIVE 170 2NC/1NR CRITICAL SECURITY AFFIRMATIVE- OVERVIEW 171 4 CDL Core Files 2015-2016 2NC/1NR CRITICAL SECURITY AFFIRMATIVE- EDUCATION DA 172 ***CURTAIL ≠ ABOLISH 173 **2NC/1NR/1NR SECURITY LETTERS AFFIRMATIVE 174 2NC/1NR SECURITY LETTERS- CURTAIL ≠ ABOLISH – OVERVIEW 175 2NC/1NR SECURITY LETTERS- CURTAIL ≠ ABOLISH – INTERPRETATION EXTENSIONS 176 **TOPICALITY AFFIRMATIVE 177 **2AC BLOCKS 178 2AC- DRONE AFFIRMATIVE- T “FEDERAL GOVERNMENT” 179 2AC- STINGRAY AFFIRMATIVE- T “FEDERAL GOVERNMENT” 180 2AC- CRITICAL SECURITY- T “FEDERAL GOVERNMENT” 181 2AC SECURITY LETTERS 182 CRIME DISADVANTAGE 184 CRIME DA 1NC 185 CRIME DA 1NC 186 CRIME DA 1NC 187 CRIME DA 1NC 188 2NC/1NR LINK EXTENSIONS: GENERAL 189 2NC/1NR EXTENSIONS: NATIONAL SECURITY LETTERS LINK 190 2NC/1NR LINK EXTENSIONS - DRONE SURVEILLANCE 192 2NC/1NR UNIQUENESS EXTENSIONS – CRIME LOW NOW 194 2NC/1NR IMPACTS TURNS CASE - SURVEILLANCE 196 2NC/1NR IMPACTS TURNS CASE – RACISM 197 2NC/1NR IMPACTS – ECONOMY 198 2NC/1NR IMPACT – POVERTY/STRUCTURAL VIOLENCE 202 CRIME DISADVANTAGE AFFIRMATIVE ANSWERS 203 NON-UNIQUE: CRIME HIGH NOW 204 NO LINK - SURVEILLANCE DOESN’T REDUCE CRIME 206 ANSWERS TO: CRIME HURTS ECONOMY 208 TERRORISM DISADVANTAGE 210 2NC/1NR EXTENSIONS: NATIONAL SECURITY LETTERS LINK 215 LINKS—DRONES 221 LINKS—GENERIC (2NC/1NR) 223 LINKS—MASS SURVEILLANCE 226 LINKS—PERCEPTION 227 2NC/1NR UNIQUENESS—SURVEILLANCE SOLVES TERROR NOW 228 2NC/1NR UNIQUENESS—TERROR RISK HI NOW 230 2NC/1NR UNIQUENESS—SURVEILLANCE NOW 232 2NC/1NR EXTENSION: IMPACT (NUCLEAR TERRORISM) 235 5 CDL Core Files 2015-2016 IMPACT—TURNS THE AFF (RACISM) 237 IMPACT—TURNS THE AFF (CIVIL LIBERTIES) 239 IMPACT—TURNS THE AFF (ROLLBACK) 241 IMPACTS—BIOTERRORàEXTINCTION 243 IMPACTS—BIOTERRORà RETALIATION 246 ANSWERS TO: SURVEILLANCE HASN’T STOPPED ANY ATTACKS 248 ANSWERS TO: BIOTERROR IMPOSSIBLE 250 ANSWERS TO: BIOTERROR UNLIKELY 252 ANSWERS TO: NO IMPACT TO BIOTERROR 254 TERRORISM DA AFFIRMATIVE ANSWERS 255 AFF—ARAB AMERICAN TURN 256 AFF—SURVEILLANCE FAILS/NO LINK 257 AFF—NO IMPACT TO BIOTERROR 259 AFF—NON-UNIQUE: NO TERROR THREAT 261 AFF—LINK TURN: TARGETED SURVEILLANCE 263 AFF—NO LINK 265 AFF—LINK TURN: MASS SURVEILLANCE 267 AFF—NO IMPACT: NO BIOTERROR 269 **ELECTIONS DISADVANTAGE NEGATIVE 272 1NC HILLARY GOOD 273 **UNIQUENESS- HILLARY GOOD 276 UNIQUENESS- HILLARY GOOD- ANSWERS TO: BERNIE SANDERS 277 UNIQUENESS- HILLARY GOOD- ANSWERS TO: TOO EARLY 278 2NC/1NR- UNIQUENESS WALL- HILLARY GOOD 279 **LINK- HILLARY GOOD 281 2NC/1NR- LINK WALL- DRONE AFFIRMATIVE 282 2NC/1NR- LINK WALL- STINGRAY AFFIRMATIVE 284 2NC/1NR- LINK WALL- SECURITY LETTERS AFFIRMATIVE 286 **IMPACT- HILLARY GOOD 287 2NC/1NR IMPACT- HILLARY GOOD- ANSWERS TO: HILLARY BAD- IRAN 288 2NC/1NR IMPACT- HILLARY GOOD- ANSWERS TO: HILLARY BAD- ECONOMY 289 **ELECTIONS DISADVANTAGE AFFIRMATIVE 290 **2AC BLOCKS 291 2AC HILLARY GOOD- LINK TURN STRATEGY 292 6 CDL Core Files 2015-2016 2AC HILLARY GOOD – IMPACT TURN STRATEGY 295 **A2- HILLARY GOOD- NO LINK 298 2AC HILLARY GOOD- DRONE AFFIRMATIVE- NO LINK 299 2AC HILLARY GOOD- STINGRAY AFFIRMATIVE- NO LINK 300 2AC HILLARY GOOD- SECURITY LETTERS - NO LINK 301 **STATES COUNTERPLAN NEGATIVE 302 1NC STATES COUNTERPLAN 303 2NC/1NR- STATES COUNTERPLAN- SOLVENCY- OVERVIEW 304 2NC/1NR- STATES COUNTERPLAN- SOLVENCY- DRONE AFF 305 2NC/1NR- STATES COUNTERPLAN- SOLVENCY- SECURITY LETTERS 306 2NC/1NR- STATES COUNTERPLAN- SOLVENCY- STINGRAY AFFIRMATIVE 307 2NC/1NR- STATES COUNTERPLAN- ANSWERS TO: PERMUTATION 309 2NC/1NR- STATES COUNTERPLAN- ANSWERS TO: FIFTY STATE FIAT BAD 310 **STATES COUNTERPLAN AFFIRMATIVE 311 2AC- STATES COUNTERPLAN 312 2AC- STATES COUNTERPLAN- SOLVENCY DEFICIT- DRONE AFFIRMATIVE 314 2AC- STATES COUNTERPLAN- SOLVENCY DEFICIT- SECURITY LETTERS AFFIRMATIVE 315 2AC- STATES COUNTERPLAN- SOLVENCY DEFICIT- STINGRAY AFFIRMATIVE 316 **CISA DISADVANTAGE NEGATIVE 317 1NC- CISA DISADVANTAGE 318 **UNIQUENESS 323 2NC/1NR- CISA DISADVANTAGE- UNIQUENESS WALL 324 **LINK 326 2NC/1NR – CISA DISADVANTAGE- LINK WALL- DRONE AFFIRMATIVE 327 2NC/1NR- CISA DISADVANTAGE- LINK WALL- STINGRAY AFFIRMATIVE 329 2NC/1NR- CISA DISADVANTAGE- LINK WALL- SECURITY LETTERS 331 **INTERNAL LINK 332 2NC/1NR- CISA DISADVANTAGE- INTERNAL LINK- ANSWERS TO: NO SPILLOVER 333 **IMPACT 334 2NC/1NR- CISA DISADVANTAGE- ANSWERS TO: ECONOMIC DECLINE /= WAR 335 2NC/1NR- CISA DISADVANTAGE- ANSWERS TO: CISA GOOD 336 **CISA DISADVANTAGE AFFIRMATIVE 338 2AC- CISA DISADVANTAGE- LINK TURN STRATEGY 339 2AC- CISA DISADVANTAGE- IMPACT TURN STRATEGY 342 2AC- CISA DISADVANTAGE- DRONE AFFIRMATIVE- NO LINK/LINK TURN 344 7 CDL Core Files 2015-2016 8 CDL Core Files 2015-2016 *** Stingray Affirmative 9 CDL Core Files 2015-2016 Stingray Affirmative Summary The Stingray is an IMSI (International MoBile SuBscriBer Identity) catcher. That is, it’s a device used for intercepting moBile phone traffic By acting as a fake “cell tower.” The Stingray specifically can use this functionality to: 1. OBtain identifying inforMation about