The Watershed Education Project Project Information 1. Proposal Title: The Watershed Education Project 2. Proposal applicants: Anne Stephens, Chico Unified School District 3. Corresponding Contact Person: Anne Stephens Chico Unified School District 2253 Humboldt Road Chico CA 95928 530- 895-4111 [email protected] 4. Project Keywords: Environmental Education Habitat Restoration, Riparian Monitoring 5. Type of project: Education 6. Does the project involve land acquisition, either in fee or through a conservation easement? No 7. Topic Area: Environmental Education 8. Type of applicant: Private non-profit 9. Location - GIS coordinates: Latitude: 39.450 Longitude: -121.489 Datum: Describe project location using information such as water bodies, river miles, road intersections, landmarks, and size in acres. Butte County 10. Location - Ecozone: 3.2 Red Bluff Diversion Dam to Chico Landing, 7.5 Big Chico Creek, 7.6 Butte Creek, 7.7 Butte Sink, 8.1 Feather River, 8.3 Bear River and Honcut Creek 11. Location - County: Butte 12. Location - City: Does your project fall within a city jurisdiction? Yes If yes, please list the city: Chico, Oroville, Paradise, Durham, Gridley, Biggs 13. Location - Tribal Lands: Does your project fall on or adjacent to tribal lands? Yes If yes, please list the tribal lands: Enterprise, Mooretown 14. Location - Congressional District: 2 15. Location: California State Senate District Number: 1 California Assembly District Number: 3 16. How many years of funding are you requesting? 3 17. Requested Funds: a) Are your overhead rates different depending on whether funds are state or federal? No If no, list single overhead rate and total requested funds: Single Overhead Rate: 4.98% Total Requested Funds: $328,056 b) Do you have cost share partners already identified? No c) Do you have potential cost share partners? Yes If yes, list partners and amount contributed by each: EPA 25,000 California Department of Education 10,000 d) Are you specifically seeking non-federal cost share funds through this solicitation? No If the total non-federal cost share funds requested above does not match the total state funds requested in 17a, please explain the difference: 18. Is this proposal for next-phase funding of an ongoing project funded by CALFED? Yes If yes, identify project number(s), title(s) and CALFED program (e.g., ERP, Watershed, WUE, Drinking Water): 2001-I204 Watershed Education Project ERP Have you previously received funding from CALFED for other projects not listed above? No 19. Is this proposal for next-phase funding of an ongoing project funded by CVPIA? Yes If yes, identify project number(s), title(s) and CVPIA program (e.g. AFRP, AFSP, b(1) other). 111 Adopt-A-watershed Training AFRP Have you previously received funding from CVPIA for other projects not listed above? No 20. Is this proposal for next-phase funding of an ongoing project funded by an entity other than CALFED or CVPIA? Yes If yes, identify project number(s), title(s) and funding source. 5 Water Quality Monitoring Sacramento River Watershed Program Please list suggested reviewers for your proposal. (optional) John Icanberry U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 209-964-4600 [email protected] Paul Maslin California State University Chico 530-898-4729 [email protected] Dave California State University 530-898-4035 [email protected] Brown chico 21. Comments: Environmental Compliance Checklist The Watershed Education Project 1. CEQA or NEPA Compliance a) Will this project require compliance with CEQA? No b) Will this project require compliance with NEPA? No c) If neither CEQA or NEPA compliance is required, please explain why compliance is not required for the actions in this proposal. This is an educational effort with K-12 students, teachers and parent volunteers. No project activities are planned that would require enviornmental review. 2. If the project will require CEQA and/or NEPA compliance, identify the lead agency(ies). If not applicable, put "None". CEQA Lead Agency: NEPA Lead Agency (or co-lead:) NEPA Co-Lead Agency (if applicable): 3. Please check which type of CEQA/NEPA documentation is anticipated. CEQA -Categorical Exemption -Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration -EIR Xnone NEPA -Categorical Exclusion -Environmental Assessment/FONSI -EIS Xnone If you anticipate relying on either the Categorical Exemption or Categorical Exclusion for this project, please specifically identify the exemption and/or exclusion that you believe covers this project. 4. CEQA/NEPA Process a) Is the CEQA/NEPA process complete? None b) If the CEQA/NEPA document has been completed, please list document name(s): 5. Environmental Permitting and Approvals (If a permit is not required, leave both Required? and Obtained? check boxes blank.) LOCAL PERMITS AND APPROVALS Conditional use permit Variance Subdivision Map Act Grading Permit General Plan Amendment Specific Plan Approval Rezone Williamson Act Contract Cancellation Other STATE PERMITS AND APPROVALS Scientific Collecting Permit CESA Compliance: 2081 CESA Compliance: NCCP 1601/03 CWA 401 certification Coastal Development Permit Reclamation Board Approval Notification of DPC or BCDC Other FEDERAL PERMITS AND APPROVALS ESA Compliance Section 7 Consultation ESA Compliance Section 10 Permit Rivers and Harbors Act CWA 404 Other PERMISSION TO ACCESS PROPERTY Permission to access city, county or other local agency land. Agency Name: Permission to access state land. Agency Name: Permission to access federal land. Agency Name: Permission to access private land. Landowner Name: 6. Comments. Land Use Checklist The Watershed Education Project 1. Does the project involve land acquisition, either in fee or through a conservation easement? No 2. Will the applicant require access across public or private property that the applicant does not own to accomplish the activities in the proposal? Yes 3. Do the actions in the proposal involve physical changes in the land use? No If you answered no to #3, explain what type of actions are involved in the proposal (i.e., research only, planning only). Occasional restoration planting of native species will be done. 4. Comments. Conflict of Interest Checklist The Watershed Education Project Please list below the full names and organizations of all individuals in the following categories: Applicants listed in the proposal who wrote the proposal, will be performing the tasks listed in the proposal or who will benefit financially if the proposal is funded. Subcontractors listed in the proposal who will perform some tasks listed in the proposal and will benefit financially if the proposal is funded. Individuals not listed in the proposal who helped with proposal development, for example by reviewing drafts, or by providing critical suggestions or ideas contained within the proposal. The information provided on this form will be used to select appropriate and unbiased reviewers for your proposal. Applicant(s): Anne Stephens, Chico Unified School District Subcontractor(s): Are specific subcontractors identified in this proposal? Yes If yes, please list the name(s) and organization(s): Allen Harthorn Watershed Education Program None None None None None None None None Helped with proposal development: Are there persons who helped with proposal development? Yes If yes, please list the name(s) and organization(s): Anne Stephens Watershed Education Programant Allen Harthorn Watershed Education Program Comments: Budget Summary The Watershed Education Project Please provide a detailed budget for each year of requested funds, indicating on the form whether the indirect costs are based on the Federal overhead rate, State overhead rate, or are independent of fund source. Independent of Fund Source Year 1 Direct Salary Benefits Other Total Task Task Supplies & Services or Indirect Total Labor (per (per Travel Equipment Direct Direct No. Description Expendables Consultants Costs Cost Hours year) year) Costs Costs 1 Coordination 2080 40,000 10,000 5,000 5,000 2,000 62000.0 3088 65088.00 Professional 2 300 9000 1000 1000 5000 1000 17000.0 847 17847.00 development Community 3 300 9000 1000 1000 3000 1000 15000.0 747 15747.00 Outreach 4 Field Study 300 9000 2000 3000 2000 16000.0 797 16797.00 5 Administration 240 3600 1000 1000 5600.0 279 5879.00 3220 70600.00 10000.00 9000.00 11000.00 8000.00 7000.00 0.00 115600.00 5758.00 121358.00 Year 2 Direct Salary Benefits Other Total Task Task Supplies & Services or Indirect Total Labor (per (per Travel Equipment Direct Direct No. Description Expendables Consultants Costs Cost Hours year) year) Costs Costs 1 Coordination 2080 40,800 10,200 2,000 2,000 1,000 56000.0 2784 58784.00 Professional 2 300 9180 1000 1000 2000 1000 14180.0 706 14886.00 development Community 3 300 9180 1000 1000 11180.0 567 11747.00 Outreach 4 Field Study 400 12240 1000 1000 2000 16240.0 809 17049.00 5 Administration 240 3672 1000 500 5172.0 256 5428.00 3320 75072.00 10200.00 5000.00 6000.00 2000.00 4500.00 0.00 102772.00 5122.00 107894.00 Year 3 Direct Salary Benefits Other Total Task Task Supplies & Services or Indirect Total Labor (per (per Travel Equipment Direct Direct No. Description Expendables Consultants Costs Cost Hours year) year) Costs Costs 1 Coordination 2080 41616 10404 2000 2000 1000 57020.0 2844 59864.00 Professional 2 200 6242 1000 1000 1000 9242.0 460 9702.00 development Community 3 200 6242 1000 1000 8242.0 410 8652.00 Outreach 4 Field Study 300 9364 2000 1000 2000 14364.0 715 15079.00 5 Administration 240 3746 1000 500 5246.0 261 5507.00 3020 67210.00 10404.00 6000.00 6000.00 0.00 4500.00 0.00 94114.00 4690.00 98804.00 Grand Total=328056.00 Comments. Budget Justification The Watershed Education Project Direct Labor Hours. Provide estimated hours proposed for each individual. 2080 hours for the Education Coordinator per year.