University of San Diego Digital USD Newspaper, The ooW lsack (1963-1987) Law Student Publications 11-17-1983 Woolsack 1983 volume 24 number 4 University of San Diego School of Law Student Bar Association Follow this and additional works at: http://digital.sandiego.edu/woolsack Part of the Law Commons Digital USD Citation University of San Diego School of Law Student Bar Association, "Woolsack 1983 volume 24 number 4" (1983). Newspaper, The Woolsack (1963-1987). 151. http://digital.sandiego.edu/woolsack/151 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Student Publications at Digital USD. It has been accepted for inclusion in Newspaper, The ooW lsack (1963-1987) by an authorized administrator of Digital USD. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The next issue is Jan. 26 Copy is due Jan. 17 Happy Finals! \'ol. 24. lssue ~ Universit y of San Diego Law Student Publication November I 7, 1983 Tuition Hiked to $6,970; Faculty Receives 5% Average Raise by J im Hester positions in the library. and 1he roo m~ 2A and 2B Stalflniter remaining onc--half position for Inter- Before the bud ge t co mm111 ec\ 10.5 percent tuition in reasc has national and Comparative Law. recommendations were finah1ed. la\\ been recommended by the nivcrsity The faculty trave l budget was sc h oo l s tudent n:prcse ntati\ C Budget Committee. The recommen- increased by J,(X)() while the rescrirch Annelle Harvey expressed cri ti ci.~m dation will be \'Oted on by the Univer- budget was raised by 3,500. A of the proposed incr ca~e. sayi ng it sity Cabinet soon. summer teaching supplement of $250 was .. unnecessary. - She said lhat a 10 The increase ra~ the tuition for p ercent inc rease is hi g h er than full-time day students to 56.9 0. while '... an increase .. US D's peers- which include .. other night students \\iU pay $4.950. Full- private law schools in California, time LL 1. students wiU pay $6.470. of this size would such as Santa Clara and Pepperdinc. - or 5 per unit. result in no tangible Harvey stated th at an incn:asc of Dean heldon Krantz said that the benefits to law this size would result in no wngi bl e increase aJlo\\ the law school to benefits to law students. such as room increase the clinicaJ faculty salaries. students.' renovations. extra copy machines or something which \\ a ··sorely the acquisition of word processors needed": to beef up the legal writing per credit will be offered beginning in She poi nted out that the budge1 pro- budget: increase pocket parts and 1985. cess is carried o ut from a University- subscriptions in the library by The standard average increase for widc perspecti ve. An example would approximately 17 percent and con- facu lty salaries was set at five percent. be '"if the law school wants Wcs tlaw. ven S25.000 of loan funds 10 merit with o ne- ha1f percent equity within the University as a whole must vote Scholarships. which should aid the Provost's discretion. o n it.·· the la\\ school in its recruiting of qual- Dean KranLZ stated that there's a The budget is broken down into ified students. strong possibility that any excess categories of "'urgent. imponant and Molle) will also be provided for funds discovered within the univer- enriching- and a 10 percent increase annual West law senice. two clerical sity will be divened to renovate class- wouJd allow '"most ... but not all . of the urgent needs to be met, according to Harvey. Prof. Nathanson Passes Away; MEMBERS OF the Appellate Moot Court Board's award winning 1101ional USO "Tuition-Based'" team are {I tor) Ernie Gr~jalva, Sarah Bunge. and Seth Madnick. i,·on phow His Loss WiJJ Be Deeply Felt Harvey emphasi1.cd that USD is The .S.D. Law School commun- very " tuition-based'' a nd has few ity was deeply saddened by the recent sources of outs ide income. She pro- National Team Advances: death of our friend and visiting pro- posed that a committee be es tablished fessor, Nathanjel - at- Nathanson. to deli berdte upon devisi ng a nd creat- Prof. athanson passed away in Chi- ing other ways to generate income so Undefeated in Regionals cago on November 7. that tuiti on increases wi ll not be the , at Nathanson was born in 190 . only alternative. The Appellate Moot Court final round of the competition. The He graduated from the Yale Law Tuitio n increases a re necessa ry. Board's National Team came away problem involved the application of School in 1932. where he was Editor- conceded Harvey. to meet certain undefeated in the Regional Round of Rule 101>-5 under federal securities in-Chief of the Yale Law Journal. He needs, mai ntain ··qualit y," keep pace the American Coll ege of Trial Law- laws and the application of RICO. or recei\'Cd an SJ.O. from Harvard in with inflation, etc. The only question yers National Moot Court Competi- Racketeer Influenced Corrupt 1933. studying under Felix Frankfur- is '"how much?" Despite surveys a nd tion. T he National Team won First O rgani.z...:'ltions Act, in a civi l context. ter. Prof. Nathanson served as a law budget meetings that arc open to all. Place in the oral a rguments and the Law schools with teams participat- clerk 10 U.S. Supreme Coun Justice there has bet: n ve ry lit tle studcn1 award for Best Brief. The team. com- ing in the competition included U D. Lous Brandeis from 1934 to 1935. He involvement. Hanr.:y stated that large prised of Sarah Bunge. Ernie Grijalva UC LA. Stanford. Pepperdine. began his career as a law professor at 1uition increases will become th r.: and Seth Madnick. beat tea ms from McGeorge. Hastings. the University Nonhwestem in 1936 and was the nom1 if there is '" co ntinued pas~ i vi L y .. McGcorge and Stanford in the first of Hawaii. Cal Western. Loyola. Frederic P. Vose Professor Emeritus and if the stude nts ··btindly accept .. round of the competition. Pepper- Southwestern. Whittier. and the ni- since 1976. One of Prof. Nathanson's them wi thout que!-ition. dinc in the quanerfinals. a second versity of San Franciso. The competi- Constitutional Law students. John Dean Kmnt1, the third representa- Stanford team in the se mifinals. and tion took place November 4 and 5 in Paul Stevens. is cu rrently a member Prof. Nathanson tive to the budget commitlec fr om the UCLA in the final round. The team downtown San Diego. of the U.S. Supreme Coun. la\\ M: hool. said he ha!<. pll,hed hard now proceeds to New York Cit y in Prof. Nathanson was a visiting dis- said that ""his death ~a tragic \ os~ to for kt.:cping down the tuiti on increase Februa ry to compete against other Holiday Craft Fair tinguished professor at .S.D. during our law school. More tha n anyone I while at lh i.: ~1mc time trying to gct a.s regio na l winners in the National Spring semesters sinoe 1977. He was know, Nat Nathanson was an id eal much for the law M:hoo l as possihlc. Finah Seeks Participants persuaded to come to U.S. D. by role model for students and younger There i ~ no mathematical ratio for rI>< Honomblc Do n Wo rk. of the Student. faculty or staff craftsper· Prof. Donald Weckstei n. who was faculty. He had high standa rd !-.. a whi ch sc hool gets what percentage ol fourth District Court of Appeals. sons arc encouraged to panicipate in Dean of the law school at that time. probing mind. was an ac1i vc ~holar. th r.: total budget. varying from yt"ar Fcdr.:ral Magistrate Harry McCuc, the Third Annual Holiday Craft Prof. athanson taught Administra- (and ) contributed his time to impor- to year depending o n need. an<.l attorney William S. Lemch. of Fair. December 7-8. For applications tive Law. Constitutional Law. lnter- llint causes. Over and above that, he Krant1 ~aid1ha1 whik 1Ui1i un j, the M ilhcrg. Wc c-s. ller.;had. Spccthrie and more information. contact Bar- na t ional Huma n R ights. a nd a was a gent le person who " "~a l ways main !>O llfCe uf lllCO lllt.: , it I!<. not lht.: & Lc rach. a San Di ego lirm which bam Schmill at 29.l-1590. the Officr seminar course on Current U.S . accessible to a nyone who needed h ~ only o ne a nd that "o ut ~iclc tun<.b"are prnctic~ securiti es law. judged the nf Student Affair.;. Serra 200. Supreme Court Litagation. The advice ... l&d for numerou' project~ . I le c11eJ a uthor of numerous law review ani- A memori<1l M:rvicc i~ tcnt.a tive ly the new busin es' \C hoo!. the m:w ' tu- cles. Prof. Nathansonalsoco-athored i;chcdulcd next ~ eme!-iter for Prol. dent cent er and Hetcher C' la!'>!<iroom ' 0 ' l'IHH ll OH<: . l .!"'1. l'ml:t)!l' Federal Rexulation of Trampona- Nathan!-io n. a~ all bein g built \\1t h o ut ~ 1d e tumb. P\ lll tion in 1954 . and Administrativt~ l.alt' r~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-. lJ11i\er~11~ o f' San Diego School of lnw in 1960. 1968 . a nd 1976. ' 1111 Dil')!U. ( \ San I )1ego . CA 92110 Pl·rinil , o, .ln:O T o those that knew him. P rof.