Fire, Herbicide, and Chainsaw Felling Effects on Arthropods in Fire-Suppressed Longleaf Pine Sandhills at Eglin Air Force Base, Florida

Fire, Herbicide, and Chainsaw Felling Effects on Arthropods in Fire-Suppressed Longleaf Pine Sandhills at Eglin Air Force Base, Florida

Fire, Herbicide, and Chainsaw Felling Effects on Arthropods in Fire-Suppressed Longleaf Pine Sandhills at Eglin Air Force Base, Florida Louis Provencher1, Krista E. M. Galley1, Andrea R. Litt1, Doria R. Gordon2, Leonard A. Brennan3, George W. Tanner4, and Jeffrey L. Hardesty2 Abstract.—Experimentally evaluating the success of prey base for red-cockaded woodpeckers and associated hardwood reduction techniques against a “model” vertebrates, many of which exclusively feed arthropods reference condition of longleaf pine sandhill to their offspring and depend on arthropods for food communities is not directly possible because reference outside of the breeding season. Conversely, these species sites are not randomized or replicated. We addressed of concern may suffer if fire suppression results in this issue by measuring the similarity of arthropods in decreases in arthropod abundance. Remarkably, there is treatment (fire, herbicide, felling/girdling, and control) a dearth of quantitative data published on the and reference sites using three indices. Arthropod relationship between fire and the arthropods that red- assemblages from plots that burned were significantly cockaded woodpeckers consume (but see Hanula and more similar to those in the reference condition than Franzreb 1998; James et al. 1997) or on arthropods in were those that did not receive fire. Our findings suggest longleaf pine forests (reviewed in Folkerts et al. 1993), that increasing arthropod prey using fire will be especially describing old-growth communities. beneficial both to management and to biodiversity. We experimentally compared the effects of three hardwood reduction techniques (growing season burn, Introduction herbicide application, and midstory mechanical felling/ Southern longleaf pine (Pinus palustris P. Mill.) forest girdling) and a no-treatment control on herb-layer restoration is, in many ways, essentially synonymous arthropod densities in fire-suppressed longleaf pine with red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis Vieillot) sandhills at Eglin Air Force Base (EAFB), Florida. habitat management, where mechanical removal and Hardwood reduction is necessary to meet EAFB’s goals short burn rotations (1–3 years) are used to reduce and for restoring functional, diverse sandhill systems across control midstory hardwood encroachment that is the Base and for habitat restoration for the endangered detrimental to the woodpeckers (Conner and Rudolph red-cockaded woodpecker and other target species 1989; Hooper et al. 1991). Because many public lands having similar habitat requirements. Our main goal was in the southern U.S. are now managed for red-cockaded to identify which management technique(s) caused woodpeckers (Brennan et al. 1995; U.S. Forest Service arthropod species assemblages to converge toward 1995), management effects on non-target species, values found in fire-maintained sandhills, which we especially birds, have become a concern in recent years termed the “reference condition” to emphasize forest (Brennan et al. 1995; Burger et al. 1998; Hunter et al. composition and function in addition to structure. 1994; Plentovich et al. 1998; White et al. 1999). Based on our analysis, we also developed metrics that may be indicators of sandhill management success. Red-cockaded woodpecker habitat management (i.e., fire) likely affects arthropods directly or indirectly by Methods stimulating population growth through increased resource availability and quality (James et al. 1997; Reed Site Description 1997). It is well documented that fire causes plants to Eglin Air Force Base (EAFB) occupies 187,555 ha in the resprout and to be more palatable to herbivores (smaller southern portions of Santa Rosa, Okaloosa, and Walton C:N ratio for plant tissues) (Dunwiddie 1991; Nagel counties in the western Florida Panhandle. The mean 1973; Owensby et al. 1970; Smith and Young 1959; Stein et al. 1992). Increased flowering after fire (Platt et annual temperature is 18.3° C, with approximately 275 al. 1988) should attract insect pollinators. In turn, freeze-free days per year. Mean annual precipitation is 158 cm. Monthly precipitation levels peak slightly increases in herbivores and pollinators may attract during late spring and early summer months and predatory arthropods and parasites. Some predatory decrease during the winter months (Chen and Gerber ground beetles, for example, increase following fire 1990). Since 1886, 25 tropical storms and 27 hurricanes (Harris and Whitcomb 1974). Increases in arthropods are important because they represent a fundamental made landfall within 97 km (60 miles) of EAFB. The terrain is level to gently rolling with occasional areas of steep slopes along creeks. Elevation ranges from 0– 1The Nature Conservancy, Niceville, FL 32588 2 The Nature Conservancy, Gainesville, FL 32611 100 m above sea level, and the landscape generally 3Tall Timbers Research Station, Tallahassee, FL 32312 slopes to the southwest toward the Gulf of Mexico. 4Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Lakeland series, the common soil, is a medium to fine University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 sand with 5-10 percent silt and clay (Overing et al. 24 The role of fire in nongame wildlife management and community restoration: traditional uses and new directions GTR-NE-288 Hardwood Reduction Plot & Subplot Layout Reference Subplot Layout 900 m CONTROL GRANULAR (NO TREATMENT) HEXAZINONE (ULW®) 240 m CHAINSAW GROWING FELLING / GIRDLING SEASON BURN 240 m 450 m 900 m × 40 m Sub-Subplot Sampling Layouts Within 10 40-m Subplot Four corner invertebrate (pre-treatment) sub-subplots: 0.5 × 2 m. One central 10 m quantitative invertebrate sub-subplot added post-treatment: 0.5 × 8 m. Figure 1.—Sample layout of one of six reference plots (81-ha) and of hardwood reduction plots and sampling areas in one of six blocks in a randomized complete block split-plot design consisting of four whole-plot treatments. Spatial randomization of treatments varies per block. 1995), is rapidly permeable and strongly acidic, with potential for recording organisms that can travel across nearly level to steep slopes. The vegetation of EAFB’s adjacent plot boundaries (Figure 1). sandhills is described in Rodgers and Provencher (1999). Reference Plots Restoration Experiment: Experimental Three pairs of 81-ha frequently burned, longleaf pine- Hardwood Removal Plots dominated reference sandhill plots were established (Fig. 1). These plots were not part of the experiment A total of 24, 81-ha plots were established in six blocks described above but were used to measure restoration of four fire-suppressed hardwood-longleaf pine sandhill success. In each reference plot, 32, 10 ´ 40-m subplots plots across EAFB (see map in Rodgers and Provencher were located in the center of the plot to reduce edge 1999). This study utilized a randomized complete block effects (Figure 1). These plots are more fully described in design (Steel and Torrie 1980), where each plot within Rodgers and Provencher (1999) and Provencher et al. an experimental block was randomly assigned to either (2000; 2001a; 2001b). For the duration of the control designation (no treatment), or to one of three restoration study, reference plots were under a “let burn” restoration treatments applied during the spring and management policy (all reference plots burned once and early summer of 1995: growing season burn in May or four plots burned at least twice during the study period). June, herbicide application (ULW®, the granular form of hexazinone with 75 percent active ingredient applied at Data Collection 2.24 kg/ha), and oaks and sand pine felling/girdling by chainsaw (slash not removed). Fuel reduction burns Densities of selected herb-layer arthropod species were were conducted in the herbicide and felling/girdling estimated. To successfully collect arthropods of various plots in early 1997. In each restoration plot, 32, 10 ´ 40- sizes and mobility, individuals were first collected using m subplots were located in the 20-ha corner farthest a sweep net, followed immediately by a modified D-Vac from the neighboring plots of the block to reduce the insect vacuum. In 1994, individuals were collected from The role of fire in nongame wildlife management and community restoration: traditional uses and new directions GTR-NE-288 25 herb-strata vegetation (<1.4 m) within four 0.5 ´ 2-m representation of uncommon species. Plots that share all sub-subplots (Figure 1). Because we suspected that the the same variables in the same proportions will have a noise and motion of our vacuum device and sweep net PS = 1, whereas plots that share no variables will have a were flushing some arthropods from adjacent sub- PS = 0. subplots, we changed the location and shape of arthropod sampling sub-subplots to a single 0.5 ´ 8-m Following Underwood and Chapman’s (1998) rectangle in the center of the subplot beginning in fall description of its superior properties, we calculated the 1995 (Figure 1). Moreover, the second method weighted average of the 1 – Bray-Curtis index of minimized escapes by arthropods because we opened dissimilarity, the sweep net once instead of four times. Specimens 6 K N N from sweep net/D-Vac samples were manually sorted BC = n (1– |Z –Z |/( ))/N i ∑ j ∑ ik jk ∑ Z + ∑ Z and preserved in 70 percent ethanol. We enlisted the ik jk j =1 k=1 k=1 k=1 assistance of taxonomic specialists, where possible, to perform initial species identifications and established a where Zik is the mean abundance of species k in plot i. reference collection

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    10 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us