Annual Report 2006

Annual Report 2006

ANNUAL REPORT ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION 2006 This work is copyright. It may be reproduced in whole or part subject to the inclusion of an acknowledgement of the source but not for commercial use or sale. Further information may be obtained from: The Tokyo MOU Secretariat Ascend Shimbashi 8F 6-19-19 Shimbashi Minato-ku, Tokyo Japan 105-0004 Tel: +81-3-3433-0621 Fax: +81-3-3433-0624 This Report is also available at Tokyo MOU web-site (http://www.tokyo-mou.org) on Internet. MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION FOREWORD We are pleased to present the Annual Report on Port State Control in the Asia-Pacific Region 2006. Tokyo MOU makes continuous endeavours and takes concerted measures to enhance and improve port State control activities in the region. In order to tackle on important areas relating to safety of navigation, safe operation of ships, ship security and prevention of pollution from ships and to facilitate and promote compliance of newly introduced convention regulations, Tokyo MOU embarks on concentrated inspection campaigns (CICs) periodically. A series of CICs have been conducted during the past and several further ones have been put on schedule for the coming years. This annual report covers the port State control developments and activities of the Tokyo MOU in 2006. Furthermore, the report also presents port State control statistics and analysis which provides the results of inspections carried out by member Authorities during the year. Successful and effective operation of the Tokyo MOU demonstrates the dedicated commitment of the eighteen member Authorities to combat against substandard shipping. Tokyo MOU will continue to apply increasing pressure and implement more stringent measures on unsafe and substandard ships so as to promote, to the maximum extent, maritime safety, security and protection of the marine environment in the region. Young-sun Park Mitsutoyo Okada Chairman Secretary Port State Control Committee Tokyo MOU Secretariat MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION CONTENTS page OVERVIEW General introduction ............................................................................…….. 1 Review of year 2006 .............................................................................…….. 2 The Port State Control Committee ......................................................…….. 3 The Asia-Pacific Computerized Information System (APCIS) ...........……. 4 Training and seminars for port State control officers .......................…….. 5 Co-operation with other regional port State control agreements ………... 8 PORT STATE CONTROL UNDER THE TOKYO MOU, 2006 Inspections ...........................................................................................……... 10 Detentions ............................................................................................……... 10 Deficiencies ..........................................................................................……... 11 Overview of port State control results 1996-2006 …………………………... 12 ANNEX 1 -- STATUS OF THE RELEVANT INSTRUMENTS .......................….. 18 ANNEX 2 -- PORT STATE INSPECTION STATISTICS ..............................…….. 20 Statistics for 2006 .....................................................................……… 20 Summary of port State inspection data 2004-2006 .......................… 29 ANNEX 3 -- ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE OF THE TOKYO MOU .............. 43 Explanatory Note on the Black-Grey-White Lists ……………………………… 44 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES page Figure 1 Inspection percentage ………………………………………………….. 13 Figure 2 Port State inspections - contribution by Authorities ……………… 13 Figure 3 Type of ship inspected ………………………………………………….. 14 Figure 4 Detentions per flag ……………………………………………………… 14 Figure 5 Detention per ship type ………………………………………………… 15 Figure 6 Deficiencies by main categories ……………………………………… 15 Figure 7 No. of inspections ……………………………………………………….. 16 Figure 8 Inspection percentage ………………………………………………….. 16 Figure 9 No. of inspections with deficiencies …………………………………. 16 Figure 10 No. of deficiencies ………………………………………………………. 17 Figure 11 No. of detentions …………………………………….…………………... 17 Figure 12 Detention percentage ……………………………….…………………... 17 Figure 13 Comparison of inspections per ship type …………………………... 35 Figure 14 Comparison of detentions per ship type ………………………….… 35 Figure 15 Comparison of inspections with deficiencies per ship type …….. 37 Figure 16 Comparison of number of deficiencies by main categories …….. 41 Table 1 Status of the relevant instruments …………………………………… 18 Table 1a Status of MARPOL 73/78 ……………………………………………….. 19 Table 2 Port State inspections carried out by Authorities …………………. 20 Table 2a Port State inspections on maritime security ……………………….. 21 Table 3 Port State inspections per flag ……………………………………….. 22 Table 4 Port State inspections per ship type …………………………………. 25 Table 5 Port State inspections per recognized organization …….……….. 26 Table 6 Deficiencies by categories …………………………………………….. 28 Table 7 Black – Grey – White Lists ……………………………………………... 29 Table 8 Inspections and detentions per flag …………………………………. 31 Table 9 Inspections and detentions per ship type ………………………….. 36 Table 10 Inspections with deficiencies per ship type ……………………….. 38 Table 11 Inspections and detentions per recognized organization ……….. 39 Table 12 Comparison of deficiencies by categories ………………………….. 42 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION OVERVIEW GENERAL INTRODUCTION The main objective of the Memorandum is to establish an effective port State control regime The Annual Report on Port State Control in in the Asia-Pacific region through co-operation the Asia-Pacific Region is published under the of its members and harmonization of their auspices of the Port State Control Committee activities, to eliminate substandard shipping so of the Memorandum of Understanding on Port as to promote maritime safety, to protect the State Control in the Asia-Pacific Region (Tokyo marine environment and to safeguard working MOU). This annual report is the twelfth issue and living conditions on board ships. and covers port State control activities and developments in the year 2006. The Port State Control Committee established under the Memorandum monitors and controls The Memorandum was concluded in Tokyo on the implementation and on-going operation of 1 December 1993. The following maritime the Memorandum. The Committee consists of Authorities in the Asia-Pacific region are the representatives of the member Authorities and signatories to the Memorandum: Australia, also observers from the maritime Authorities Canada, Chile, China, Fiji, Hong Kong (China), and the inter-governmental organizations Indonesia, Japan, Republic of Korea, Malaysia, which have been granted observer status by New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, the the Committee, namely: Democratic People’s Philippines, the Russian Federation, Republic of Korea, Macao (China), Solomon Singapore, Solomon Islands, Thailand, Islands, United States Coast Guard, the Vanuatu and Vietnam. The Memorandum International Maritime Organization (IMO), the came into effect on 1 April 1994. International Labour Organization (ILO), the Paris MOU, the Viña del Mar Agreement, the In accordance with the provisions of the Indian Ocean MOU and the Black Sea MOU. Memorandum, the Authorities which have The Secretariat of the Memorandum is located signed and formally accepted the in Tokyo, Japan. Memorandum or which have been accepted with unanimous consent of the Port State For the purpose of the Memorandum, the Control Committee would become full following instruments are the basis for port members. Currently, the Memorandum has 18 State control activities in the region: full members, namely: Australia, Canada, Chile, China, Fiji, Hong Kong (China), − the International Convention on Load Indonesia, Japan, Republic of Korea, Malaysia, Lines, 1966; New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, the Philippines, the Russian Federation, − the Protocol of 1988 relating to the Singapore, Thailand, Vanuatu and Vietnam. 1 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION International Convention on Load At the Second Joint Ministerial Conference of Lines, 1966, as amended; the Paris and Tokyo Memoranda on Port State Control two years ago, the Ministers stressed − the International Convention for the that the conduct of PSC officers is of utmost Safety of Life at Sea, 1974, as importance and should be maintained at the amended; highest level. The Ministers encouraged the both Memoranda to develop and implement a − the Protocol of 1978 relating to the code of good practice for PSC officers. International Convention for the Pursuing the decision made by the Ministers, Safety of Life at Sea, 1974; Tokyo MOU adopted the Code of Good Practice for PSC Officers which was − the Protocol of 1988 relating to the developed in the similar manner as the Paris International Convention for the MOU. Integrity, professionalism and Safety of Life at Sea, 1974; transparency are the three fundamental principles and the core of the Code. All PSC − the International Convention for the officers in the region had been requested to Prevention of Pollution from Ships bring their conduct and behaviour in line with 1973, as modified by the Protocol of the Code. The Code of Good Practice has 1978 relating thereto, as amended;

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    52 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us