August 31, 2021 Switzerland Risk profile (SRRI) 1) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Credit Suisse (CH) 130/30 Swiss Equity Fund Class B CHF Investment policy Net performance in CHF (rebased to 100) and yearly performance 2) The fund targets its investments on equities of com- 180 80% panies that are domiciled in Switzerland or are includ- ed in the SPI. Criteria for stock selection include the 160 60% valuation of the company, the business climate, the 140 40% 30.6 company`s positioning and the quality of its manage- 25.8 28.6 19.9 19.7 ment. The aim is to outperform the SPI over the long 120 13.2 20% 7.1 3.8 term. Fluctuations in the value of the fund units may 100 0% -1.4 -1.4 differ substantially from those in the SPI. The long -7.0 -8.6 80 -20% exposure can go up to 130% and the short exposure 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 to -30%. CS (CH) 130/30 Swiss Equity Fund B CHF Yearly or year-to-date performance respectively (Fund) SPI (TR) Yearly or year-to-date performance respectively (Benchmark) Fund facts Fund manager Net performance in CHF 2) Credit Suisse Asset Management (Schweiz) AG 1 month 3 months YTD 1 year 3 years 5 years Fund manager since 01.01.2021 Fund 0.57 4.00 13.22 18.06 40.69 84.40 Location Zurich Benchmark 2.37 8.72 19.66 25.98 48.48 78.87 Management company Credit Suisse Funds AG Fund domicile Switzerland Sectors in % Fund currency CHF Close of financial year 31. May Fund Total net assets (in mil.) 325.94 Health Care 36.07 Inception date 17.12.2004 Consumer Staples 20.84 Management fee p.a. 1.00% Financials 18.86 Performance fee Industrials 9.22 15% of outperformance versus the benchmark Materials 5.47 Ongoing charge 1.08% Consumer Discretionary 4.54 Benchmark (BM) SPI (TR) Communication Services 2.73 Swinging single pricing (SSP) 3) Yes Utilities 1.45 Unit class Category B Cash/Cash Equivalents 1.51 (capital growth) Others -0.71 Unit class currency CHF ISIN CH0017229615 Fund statistics 2) Top 10 Holdings in % Bloomberg ticker CSEQSSA SW 3 years 5 years Nestle SA 19.70 Valor no. 1722961 Annualised volatility in % 11.39 10.41 Roche Holding AG 15.72 Net asset value (NAV) 39.04 Information ratio -0.51 0.19 Novartis AG 13.03 Redemptions Daily Tracking Error (Ex post) 4.02 3.63 Zurich Insurance Group 4.80 Morningstar Rating as of 31.08.2021 Beta 0.87 0.89 Cie Financiere Richemont 3.23 UBS Group AG 3.08 3) For more details, please refer to the relevant Significant ransactionsT ABB 2.75 chapter "Net Asset Value" of the Fund’s prospectus. Lonza 2.57 Purchases Sales Alcon 2.41 Softwareone Holding Ag Galenica Ag Lafargeholcim Ltd 2.26 Ams Dksh Holding Reg Total 69.55 Banque Cantonale Vaudoise Geberit Siegfried Holding Reg Valora Holding Reg Baloise-Holding Reg Valora Holding Reg Risk Exposure Maximum Portfolio Long Equity 130.0% 117.6% Short Equity 30.0% 19.2% Investment Degree 100.0% 98.3% Total Exposure 160.0% 136.8% 1) The calculation of the risk indicator is based on the CESR/10-673 Guidelines. The risk indicator is based on historic and partly simulated data; it cannot be used to predict future developments. The classification of the Fund may change in future and does not represent a guarantee. A classification into category 1 is no risk-free investment either. 2) Historical performance indications and financial market scenarios are not reliable indicators of current or future performance. The performance data does not take1 into/ 3 account the commissions and costs incurred on the issue and redemption of fund units. Asset Allocation presented on this page may change over time. August 31, 2021 Switzerland Credit Suisse (CH) 130/30 Swiss Equity Fund Class B CHF ESG Rating vs Benchmark 4) Portfolio Summary 5) ESG E S G This fund does not invest in companies which are involved in the development or production of nuclear, biological, and chemical warfare agents, anti-personnel mines and cluster bombs according to the exclusion list from the Swiss Association for Responsible Investments (SVVK - ASIR). Fund A A BBB BBB Applied ESG Characteristics 6) £ ESG Benchmark £ ESG Integration R Engagement BM AA A BBB BBB R Exclusion Criteria R Proxy Voting ESG Rating in Percent vs Benchmark 9) ESG Breakdown 7) Score 50% Overall Score 7.1 43% 43% 40% 41% Environment 6.240% Climate Change 8.3 Env. Opportunities 6.730% Natural Capital 5.5 Pollution & Waste 5.220% Social 5.1 9% 10% 8% Human Capital 5.3 4% 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% Product Liability 4.7 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% Social Opportunities 5.9 AAA AA A BBB BB B CCC N/A Stakeholder Opposition 4.9 CS (CH) 130/30 Swiss Equity Fund Switzerland SPI TR Index Governance 5.6 Top 10 Holdings 8) ESG Controversies Flag Holding Name Weight ESG Rating Cont.Flag E S G Nestle 19.7% AA ■ ■ ■ ■ Roche Holding AG 15.7% A ■ ■ ■ ■ Fund Novartis AG 13.0% A ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Green (26.1% vs. 32.6%) ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Yellow (15.5% vs. 13.0%) Zurich Insurance Group Ltd 4.8% AA ■ Orange (58.3% vs. 52.6%) Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA 3.2% AA ■ ■ ■ ■ BM ■ Red (0.0% vs. 0.0%) UBS Group AG 3.1% AA ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Not rated (0.1% vs. 1.7%) ABB Ltd 2.7% AA ■ ■ ■ ■ Lonza Group AG 2.6% AAA ■ ■ ■ ■ Alcon, Inc. 2.4% A ■ ■ ■ ■ HOLCIM LTD 2.3% A ■ ■ ■ ■ Low Carbon Transition Score 10) Carbon Emission Intensity 11) Portfolio: 6.3 / Benchmark: 6.2 Tons CO2-equivalent emissions per $m revenues Portfolio: 139.1 / Benchmark: 110.7 7 2'000 5.0% 6 1'750 4.0% 5 1'500 3.0% 2.0% 4 1'250 1.0% 3 1'000 0.0% 750 2 -1.0% 500 Active weight 1 -2.0% 250 -3.0% 0 eighted average emissions Intensity W per million $ sales 0 -4.0% Real Portfolio Benchmark Energy Health Utilities Others Care Materials Consumer ConsumerStaples Financials Industrials Information Estate Services echnology Communication Discretionary T Portfolio weighted average CO2 emission intensity (lhs) Active weight (rhs) Benchmark weighted average CO2 emission intensity (lhs) Legend 4) ESG Rating which is provided by MSCI ESG, is measured on a scale from AAA (highest rating) to CCC (lowest rating). The rating is based on the underlying company’s exposure to industry specific sustainability risks and their ability to mitigate those risks relative to their peers. The overall portfolio rating is calculated on an industry relative basis while the underlying individual E,S and G ratings are absolute. Hence, the overall rating cannot be seen as an average of the individual E, S and G ratings. 5) For more information on the applied norms-based exclusions please refer to: www.svvk-asir.ch © In the absence of suitable and/or liquid equity index futures on ESG indices, the Sub-Fund / Fund may use equity index futures, which refer to traditional indices (non-ESG) in order to reduce various risks, for efficient portfolio management and as a way to gain or reduce market exposure. 6) For further information on the methodology applied to assess the ESG characteristics of the investments, please refer to www.msci.com/our-solutions/esg-investing/ 7) The Overall ESG Quality Score does not correspond directly to the presented underlying Environment, Social and Governance Pillar scores. The Pillar scores are derived on an absolute basis, while the Overall ESG Quality Score is adjusted to reflect the industry-specific level of sustainability risk exposure. Since Pillar scores are absolute, and Overall scores are relative, the first cannot be averaged to derive the latter. ESG Themes represent a break-down of individual E, S and G scores. All scores and its’ components are rated on a scale of 0-10 (provided by MSCI), where 0 is very poor and 10 is very good. 8) ESG Controversies Flag is designed to provide timely and consistent assessments of ESG controversies involving publicly traded companies and fixed income issuers. A controversy case is typically a one-off event such as an environmental oil spill, an accident, or allegations such as safety issues in a production facility. The colour indicator, which spans from red to green, indicates the most severe involvement (red) to the least involved (green) in any controversies. The grey colour indicates where data is unavailable. 9) ESG Ratings represents the MSCI ESG Rating breakdown in percentage in an absolute view or relative to a benchmark. GRESB ratings for real estate are not taken into account. 10) Low Carbon Transition Score is based on a multi-dimensional risks and opportunities assessment and considers both predominant and secondary risks a company faces. The scale ranges from 0-10 (with 10 representing a potential leader) and is industry agnostic and represents an absolute assessment of a company’s position vis-à-vis the transition. On a portfolio level, individual scores are aggregated and compared to the benchmark (if existent). 11) Carbon Intensities compares the weighted average emissions intensity per million $ sales (broken down by GICS sector) between the portfolio and the benchmark. It also displays active GICS sector weights. 2 / 3 Potential risks The Fund’s risk and reward profile does not reflect the risk inherent in future circumstances that differ from what the Fund has experienced in the recent past. This includes the following events which are rare but can have a large impact.