Updated: 03.04.2011 Additions and corrections to the new Catalogue of Palaearctic Cerambycidae [Cerambycidae by K. Adlbauer, M. L. Danilevsky, A. Drumont, L. Hubweber, Z. Komiya, I. Löbl, J. Morati, P. Rapuzzi, G. Sama, A. Smetana & A. Weigel] pp. 37-61, 84-334, 644-924 (part.). In: Lobl I. & Smetana A. (ed.): Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera, Vol. 6. Stenstrup: Apollo Books, 924pp. Many colleagues take an active part in the discussion of the current taxonomy problems of the Catalog with own remarks and delivery of missing publications: Matěj Čermák, Alain Drumont, Tomáš Tichý, Dan Heffern, Carolus Holzschuh, Jacek Kurzawa, Maxim Lazarev, Ivan Löbl, Tatsuya Niisato, Nobuo Ohbayashi, Gianfranco Sama, Andrey Shapovalov, Ales Smetana, Petr Svacha, Francesco Vitali. All acceptable corrections of the two new publications are included: Löbl I. & Smetana A., 2011. Errata for volume 6, pp. 35-61. In: I. Lobl & A. Smetana (ed.): Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera, Vol. 7. Stenstrup: Apollo Books, 373pp. Miroshnikov A.I. 2011. The longicorn beetles (Cerambycidae) in "Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera. Stenstrup, 2010". Remarks and additions. Entomologia Kubanica. Supplement № 1.Krasnodar: 113pp. [in Russian with English abstract] p. 11 and 13 The text of “DISTRIBUTIONAL INFORMATION” for Europe (p. 11) in the present Vol. 6 is just same as in other volumes 1- 5, but eastern boundaries of Europe in the map (p. 13) are considerably changed. Before, the total territories of Ekaterinburg and Chelyabinsk regions (eastwards from Urals) were in Europe [CT], as well as the whole Orenburg reion [ST]. But now now the eastern boundaries of Europe are marked along the main ridge of the Ural Mountains and along Ural river. So, now Ekaterinburg and Chelyabinsk regions are mostly (but not totally!) in Asia [WS], as well as the eastern part of Orenburg region (eastwards Ural River) [WS]. The attribution of the south part of Orenburg region (southwards Ural River with several endemic taxa) is not clear in the Vol. 6. My distributional data in Vol. 6 were arranged in agreement with eastern boundaries of Europe shown in the maps for volumes 1- 5: with Ekaterinburg and Chelyabinsk regions in Europe [CT], as well as the whole Orenburg region [ST]. p. 42 printed: Microarthron komarowi (Dohrn, 1885): the original spelling of the species epithet is komaroffi, a patronym in honour of General Komaroff. This spelling was also used by Heyden (1885b) but subsequent authors spelled the name "komarowi". The spelling "komarowi" is in prevailing use, and thus considered as correct (ICZN, Art. 33.3.1). In fact “komarowi” is not in prevailing usage! See: “komarovi” by Plavilstshikov, 1932, 1936; Kostin, 1973; Lobanov et al., 1981; Mamaev, Danilevsky, 1975; Danilevsky, 1984; Svacha, 1987 – and many others! So, it is better now to return to the original spelling: Microarthron komaroffi (Dohrn, 1885). p. 44 printed: Dorcadion sulcipenne argonauta Suvorov, 1913 as subspecies from species, based on the type examination of D. argonauta Suvorov, 1913 (Zoological Institute, Sankt-Petersburg, Russia), and original description of D. sulcipenne Küster, 1847 as well as on numerous specimens of both taxa. Published before by Lazarev, 2008 Lazarev M. A. 2008: Zametki po spornym voprosam sistematiki i rasprostranenia zhukov-usachey (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae) Rossii i sopredelnyh stran. Pp. 129-136. In: Aktualnye problemy prioritetnyh napravleniy razvitiya estestvennyh nauk. Sbornik statey. Moskva, Izdatelstvo «Prometey» MPGU: 220с. p. 44 printed: Agapanthia subnigra Pic, 1890 is a valid species, as well as Agapanthia subchalydaea Reitter, 1898, though it was traditionally (Plavilstshikov, 1958a: 159) regarded as an invalid synonym of the junior name (based on the type material of both species). Published before by Pesarini & Sabbadini, 2004b p. 44-45 printed: Dorcadion sareptanum kubanicum Plavilstshikov, 1934: According to Plavilstshikov (1958a: 181) the male syntypes of Dorcadion euxinum Suvorov, 1915 (described from Novorossijsk) are D. sareptanum Kraatz, 1873, and only one female designated as type although not mentioned in the original description is D. cinerarium (Fabricius, 1787). Consenquently, Danilevsky et al., 2005 established the synonymy of D. sareptanum euxinum Suvorov and D. kubanicum Plavilstshikov, 1934. A study of the available syntypes of D. euxinum Suvorov, 1915 (housed in ZIN, Sankt-Petersburg) revealed that they are all males of D. cinerarium. One of them is designated by M. Lazarev (in press) as lectotype. Thus, D. cinerarium (Fabricius) = D. euxinum Suvorov, and D. sareptanum kubanicum Plavilstshikov is a valid name. The name D. euxinum Suvorov was published (Plavilstshikov, 1931: 64; 1958a: 118) as a synonym of D. cinerarium. must be: Dorcadion sareptanum euxinum Suvorov, 1915: According to Plavilstshikov (1958a: 181) the male-syntypes of Dorcadion euxinum Suvorov, 1915 (described from Novorossijsk) are D. sareptanum Kraatz, 1873, and at least one type-female is D. cinerarium (Fabricius, 1787). Consequently, Danilevsky et al., 2005 established the synonymy of D. sareptanum euxinum Suvorov and D. kubanicum Plavilstshikov, 1934. In fact D. euxinum Suvorov, 1915 was described on the base of a single male, and that holotype was studied by Plavilstshikov (1958a), but recently (2009) was not found. Two available females (ZIN – designated as male and female) are wrongly designated by Suvorov as types of his D. euxinum Suvorov, 1915, as both are not mentioned in the original description. The female designated by Suvorov as male is not the holotype, as it is much bigger (14mm, while the holotype was 11.5.mm) and has many different characters. The name D. euxinum Suvorov was several times published by Plavilstshikov (1921: 111; 1931: 64; 1958a: 118) as a synonym of D. cinerarium, because Plavilstshikov accepted wrongly designated females as types of D. euxinum Suvorov. p. 46 printed: Dorcadion arietinum strandi Plavilstshikov, 1931, syn. nov. of Dorcadion arietinum phenax Jakovlev, 1900, based on examinations of respective type material and specimens from NW China. The synonyms were published before by Breuning (1962: 230) in form: “D. phenax m. strandi Plav.” And then by Danilevsky (2009e:653; 2009f: 710): Dorcadion arietinum phenax Jakovlev, 1900 = Dorcadion arietinum strandi Plavilstshikov, 1931. Danilevsky M.L. 2009e: [Species Group Taxa of Longhorned Beetles (Coleoptera,Cerambycidae) Described by N. N. Plavilstshikov and Their Types Preserved in the Zoological Museum of the Moscow State University and in the Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg]. Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie 88 (3): 630– 663. [in Russian] Danilevsky M.L. 2009f: Species Group Taxa of Longhorned Beetles (Coleoptera,Cerambycidae) Described by N. N. Plavilstshikov and Their Types Preserved in the Zoological Museum of the Moscow State University and in the Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg. Entomological Review 89 (6): 689–720. p. 46 printed: Etorufus circaocularis Pic, 1934, syn. nov. of Etorufus nemurensis Matsushita, 1933; these names were previously placed in synonymy, the latter erroneously listed as invalid. must be: Etorofus circaocularis Pic, 1934, syn. nov. of Etorofus nemurensis Matsushita, 1933; these names were previously placed in synonymy, the latter erroneously listed as invalid. The spelling “Etorufus” traditional for European publications (Villiers, 1978: 210; Švácha, 1989: 130; Sama, 1992b: 297, 301; 2002: 24; Sláma, 2006: 8) is wrong. The original spelling accepted in Japan publications is “Etorofus”. Sláma M., 2006. Coleoptera: Cerambycidae. Folia Heyrovskyana Serie B, Icones Insectorum Europae Centralis. 2006 June 20, 4: 1-40. p. 46 printed: nigra DeGeer, 1775: 144 (Leptura) It was not a new name, but wrong identification. The taxon was named: „Leptura nigra Linn.“ p. 46 printed: Leptura apicalis Motschulsky, 1875 syn. nov. of Stictoleptura fulva (DeGeer, 1775), based on examination of type materials of L. apicalis and West European Stictoleptura fulva. Published before by Lazarev, 2008 Lazarev M. A. 2008: Zametki po spornym voprosam sistematiki i rasprostranenia zhukov-usachey (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae) Rossii i sopredelnyh stran. Pp. 129-136. In: Aktualnye problemy prioritetnyh napravleniy razvitiya estestvennyh nauk. Sbornik statey. Moskva, Izdatelstvo «Prometey» MPGU: 220с. p. 46 printed: Macrorhabdium Plavilstshikov, 1915, syn. nov. of Pseudosierversia Kraatz, 1879, based on study of the respective type species. Macrorhabdium ruficolle Plavilstshikov, 1915, syn. nov. of Pseudosierversia rufa Kraatz, 1879, based on the examination of the holotype of ruficolle and specimens of P. rufa from the Far East. Published before by Danilevsky (2009e:633; 2009f: 692): Danilevsky M.L. 2009e: [Species Group Taxa of Longhorned Beetles (Coleoptera,Cerambycidae) Described by N. N. Plavilstshikov and Their Types Preserved in the Zoological Museum of the Moscow State University and in the Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg]. Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie 88 (3): 630– 663. [in Russian] Danilevsky M.L. 2009f: Species Group Taxa of Longhorned Beetles (Coleoptera,Cerambycidae) Described by N. N. Plavilstshikov and Their Types Preserved in the Zoological Museum of the Moscow State University and in the Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg. Entomological Review 89 (6): 689–720. p. 47 printed (two times): Poecilium alni elbursense Holzschuh, 1977 must