Doktori Disszertáció

Doktori Disszertáció

Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem Bölcsészettudományi Kar DOKTORI DISSZERTÁCIÓ Székely Péter The Academic Novel in the Age of Postmodernity: The Anglo-American Metafictional Academic Novel Irodalomtudományi Doktori Iskola, A doktori Iskola vezetője: Dr. Kulcsár Szabó Ernő Modern Angol és Amerikai Irodalom Program, A program vezetője: Dr. Sarbu Aladár A bizottság tagjai és tudományos fokozatuk: Elnök: Dr. Kállay Géza PhD., dr. habil., egyetemi tanár Hivatalosan felkért bírálók: Dr. Fülöp Zsuzsanna CSc., egyetemi docens Dr. Sarbu Aladár DSc., egyetemi tanár Titkár: Dr. Farkas Ákos PhD., egyetemi docens További tagok: Dr. Bényei Tamás PhD. CSc., dr. habil., egyetemi docens Dr. Péteri Éva PhD., egyetemi adjunktus Dr. Takács Ferenc PhD., egyetemi docens Témavezető és tudományos fokozata: Dr. Dávidházi Péter DSc., dr. habil., egyetemi tanár Budapest, 2009 Contents INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 4 I. WHAT IS AN ACADEMIC NOVEL? .......................................................................................... 11 1.1. NOMENCLATURE ................................................................................................................................. 11 1.2. THE DIFFICULTIES OF DEFINING ACADEMIC FICTION ................................................................................ 12 1.2.1. THE STEREOTYPICAL NOTION OF THE ACADEMIC NOVEL ............................................................................ 12 1.2.2. SETTING ........................................................................................................................................... 15 1.2.3. SATIRE ............................................................................................................................................ 18 1.2.4. WORKING DEFINITION ........................................................................................................................ 22 1.3. THE ACADEMIC NOVEL: FACT OR FICTION? ............................................................................................ 26 II. INESCAPABLE MIMESIS: ACADEMIC FICTION AS LITERARY REALISM ....................................................................... 31 2.1. MODES OF REFERENTIAL CRITICISM ...................................................................................................... 31 2.1.1. TYPE I: THE ACADEMIC NOVEL AS A DOCUMENTARY OF INDIVIDUAL EXPERIENCE ......................................... 32 2.1.2. TYPE II: DOCUMENTARIES WITH A GENERALIZING PERSPECTIVE ................................................................ 34 2.1.3. TYPE III: THE CONCEPTUALIZING PERSPECTIVE ...................................................................................... 36 2.1.4. TYPE IV: THE HISTORICIZING PERSPECTIVE ........................................................................................... 45 2.2. CRITICAL RECEPTION ........................................................................................................................... 48 2.2.1. INESCAPABLE MIMESIS ........................................................................................................................ 48 2.2.2. CRITICISM OF THE MIMETIC APPROACH .................................................................................................. 51 III. FROM LITERARY REALISM TO POSTMODERNISM ....................................................... 53 3.1. THE EXHAUSTION OF REALIST REPRESENTATIONAL TECHNIQUES ............................................................... 54 3.2. THE EMERGENCE OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ACADEMIC NOVEL .................................................................... 57 3.3. REALISM, MODERNIST, REALISM, POSTMODERNISM: PARADIGM SHIFTS IN THE NOVEL .................................................................................................................. 61 IV. THE FOUR ASPECTS OF THE METAFICTIONAL NOVEL .............................................. 72 4.1. FICTION WHICH IS CONSCIOUS OF BEING FICTION .................................................................................... 72 4.1.1. METAFICTION: INDIVIDUAL OR COLLECTIVE ENTERPRISE ........................................................................... 72 4.2. METAFICTION AS CRITICAL FICTION ...................................................................................................... 77 4.2.1. METAFICTIONAL AS AN INTERPRETATIVE PARADIGM ................................................................................ 77 4.2.2. ASPECTS OF SELF-CONSCIOUSNESS ........................................................................................................ 78 4.3. METAFICTION AND THE ACADEMIC NOVEL .............................................................................................. 82 V. WRITERLY METAFICTION ..................................................................................................... 84 5.1. THE WELL OF NEW TAMMANY COLLEGE: THE QUESTION OF AUTHORSHIP IN JOHN BARTH’S GILES GOAT-BOY ........................................................... 84 5.2. THE INTRUSIVE AUTHOR IN ISHMAEL REED’S JAPANESE BY SPRING ...................................................... 91 5.3. AUTHORIAL SURROGACY IN PABLO URBANYI’S THE NOWHERE IDEA ...................................................... 98 5.4. CONCLUSION ..................................................................................................................................... 104 2 VI. CRITICAL FICTION: TEXTUAL METAFICTION IN THE ACADEMIC NOVEL ...................................................... 106 6.1. A TEXTUAL METAFICTIONAL CONDITION (OF ENGLAND NOVEL) .............................................................. 108 6.2. GUIDING METAFICTIONALITY .............................................................................................................. 114 6.3. EXCESSIVE TEXTUAL METAFICTIONALITY ............................................................................................. 119 6.4. CONCLUSION ..................................................................................................................................... 122 VII. READERLY METAFICTION ................................................................................................ 127 7.1. THE NOTION OF READERLY SURROGACY ............................................................................................... 127 7.1.1. THE SURROGATE READER AS NARRATIVE ACCESSORY ............................................................................. 128 7.1.2. READERLY SURROGACY AS A MEANS OF INTERPRETATION ....................................................................... 134 7.2. CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................................... 142 VIII. NON-FICTIONAL METAFICTION .................................................................................... 145 8.1. SELF-CONSCIOUSNESS DECONSTRUCTED ................................................................................................ 145 8.2. TYPES OF NON-FICTIONAL METAFICTION .............................................................................................. 149 8.2.1. BIOGRAPHICAL METAFICTION ............................................................................................................. 150 8.2.2. HISTORIOGRAPHIC METAFICTION ......................................................................................................... 156 8.3. CRITICISM OF NON-FICTIONAL METAFICTION ........................................................................................ 160 IX. TWO READINGS OF DAVID LODGE’S SMALL WORLD ................................................ 163 9.1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 163 9.2. LITERARY THEORY AT THE CROSSROADS: A REFERENTIAL READING OF DAVID LODGE’S SMALL WORLD .............................................................................................................................................................. 164 9.3. TEXTUAL METAFICTION IN DAVID LODGE’S SMALL WORLD ................................................................ 171 X. CONCLUSION AND SPECULATIONS ................................................................................... 179 BIBLIOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................................. 185 3 Introduction The thing is this. That of all the several ways of beginning a book which are now in practice throughout the known world, I am confident my own way of doing it is the best – I’m sure it is the most religious – for I begin with writing the first sentence – and trusting to Almighty god for the second. Laurence Sterne, Tristram Shandy As Elaine Showalter observes in her recent book entitled Faculty Towers (2005), ‘the academic novel is by now a small but recognizable subgenre of contemporary fiction and has a small body of criticism devoted to it’1. The curious fact, however, is that albeit the Anglo- American academic novel can boast with an impressively sizeable and versatile literary output, its reception is still organized around one overwhelmingly dominant critical approach: to seek ways of confirming and elucidating how an academic novel describes, comments on or criticizes the experiential reality of higher

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    190 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us