Distribution of Competences in Relation to Regional Development Policies in the Member States of the European Union

Distribution of Competences in Relation to Regional Development Policies in the Member States of the European Union

Contract No. 2008.CE.16.0.AT.040 / 2008.CE.16.CAT.014 Distribution of Competences in relation to Regional Development Policies in the Member States of the European Union FINAL REPORT SUBMITTED BY: FEBRUARY 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................................4 GLOSSARY......................................................................................................................................14 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................17 CHAPTER 1. LITERATURE REVIEW: FORMS THAT THE DISTRIBUTION OF COMPETENCES BETWEEN CENTRAL AND SUB-NATIONAL LEVELS MAY TAKE..20 1.1. FORMS OF DECENTRALISATION .................................................................................................20 1.2. FORMS OF INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONSHIPS....................................................................21 1.3. GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS............................................................................................................22 1.4. GLOBAL FACTORS DRIVING DECENTRALISATION IN EUROPE ....................................................25 1.5. SUB-NATIONAL TAX AND FISCAL FEDERALISM..........................................................................27 1.6. FINAL CONSIDERATIONS ON CHAPTER 1...................................................................................32 CHAPTER 2. MAIN FEATURES OF THE TRENDS IN DECENTRALISATION OBSERVED IN EUROPE OVER THE PAST FIFTEEN YEARS ............................................34 2.1. INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................34 2.2. TRENDS OF DECENTRALISATION IN EUROPE..............................................................................34 2.3. MAIN FEATURES OF THE DECENTRALISATION PROCESS IN THE EUROPEAN COUNTRIES .............35 2.4. CONSULTATION MECHANISMS BETWEEN SUB-NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS.................................42 2.4.1. General overview ..............................................................................................................42 2.4.2. Examples of institutional arrangement for coordination..................................................44 2.5. THE EUROPEAN OUTLOOK: EXPENDITURE AND REVENUE OF DIFFERENT ADMINISTRATIVE LEVELS ............................................................................................................................................53 2.5.1. Expenditure .......................................................................................................................53 2.5.2. Revenue .............................................................................................................................69 2.6. FINAL CONSIDERATIONS ON CHAPTER 2....................................................................................77 CHAPTER 3. THE EVOLUTION OF COMPETENCES IN THE AREAS RELEVANT FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT .....................................................................................................79 3.1. COMPETENCES ON DEVELOPMENT POLICIES IN DIFFERENT GROUPS OF EU MEMBER STATES ...79 3.1.1. Federalised States .............................................................................................................79 3.1.2. Regionalised states............................................................................................................81 3.1.3. States with ‘Northern systems’..........................................................................................83 3.1.4. Other Unitary States..........................................................................................................84 3.2. AN ANALYSIS OF EXPENDITURE IN THE SECTORS MOST RELEVANT FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT.................................................................................................................................90 3.2.1. The definition of public expenditure for development.......................................................90 3.2.2. The scale of expenditure for development.........................................................................92 3.2.3. Expenditure for development: a focus on its composition ..............................................104 3.3. FINAL CONSIDERATIONS ON CHAPTER 3.................................................................................110 CHAPTER 4. TERRITORIAL DISTRIBUTION OF COMPETENCES................................112 4.1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................112 4.2. MAIN RESULTS FROM THE COUNTRY STUDIES.......................................................................114 2 ISMERI EUROPA – APPLICA 4.2.1. Austria .............................................................................................................................114 4.2.2. Germany ..........................................................................................................................121 4.2.3. Spain................................................................................................................................129 4.2.4. Italy..................................................................................................................................136 4.2.5. France .............................................................................................................................145 4.2.6. The UK ............................................................................................................................150 4.2.7. Sweden.............................................................................................................................159 4.2.8. Portugal...........................................................................................................................162 4.2.9. Poland .............................................................................................................................166 4.2.10. Hungary.........................................................................................................................170 4.2.11. Czech Republic..............................................................................................................174 4.3. FINAL CONSIDERATIONS ON CHAPTER 4 ..................................................................................176 CHAPTER 5. CONCLUSIONS AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS ..........................................181 6. REFERENCES...........................................................................................................................191 7. ANNEX 1 – COUNTRY NOTES (MS NOT COVERED IN THE CASE STUDIES).........194 7.1. BELGIUM.................................................................................................................................194 7.2. LUXEMBOURG.........................................................................................................................199 7.3. DENMARK ...............................................................................................................................203 7.4. FINLAND .................................................................................................................................207 7.5. THE NETHERLANDS ................................................................................................................211 7.6. SLOVENIA ...............................................................................................................................215 7.7. IRELAND .................................................................................................................................218 7.8. GREECE...................................................................................................................................222 7.9. SLOVAKIA...............................................................................................................................226 7.10. MALTA..................................................................................................................................229 7.11. LATVIA .................................................................................................................................232 7.12. LITHUANIA............................................................................................................................236 7.13. ESTONIA ...............................................................................................................................240 7.14. BULGARIA.............................................................................................................................243 7.15. ROMANIA..............................................................................................................................247 7.16. CYPRUS.................................................................................................................................251 7.17. CZECH REPUBLIC ..................................................................................................................254 8. ANNEX 2 - METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH: FINAL CLASSIFICATIONS AND TEMPLATES.................................................................................................................................258 8.1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................258

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    270 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us