Fallen Pillars: the Past, Present, and Future Population Dynamics of A

Fallen Pillars: the Past, Present, and Future Population Dynamics of A

bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/365650; this version posted July 9, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Fallen Pillars: The Past, Present, and Future Population Dynamics of a Rare, 2 Specialist Coral-Algal Symbiosis 3 4 Running Head: Population Dynamics of Dendrogyra cylindrus 5 6 Andrea N. Chan1, Cynthia L. Lewis2,3, Karen L. Neely4,5, Iliana B. Baums1 7 8 1Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802 9 2Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199 10 3Keys Marine Laboratory, Long Key, FL 33001 11 4Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33314 12 5Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Tallahassee, FL 32399 13 14 Corresponding Author: Andrea N. Chan, (626) 893-0247, [email protected] 15 16 Keywords: Dendrogyra cylindrus, Climate change, Population genetics, Symbiodinium, Rare 17 species, Conservation genetics 18 19 Paper type: Original Research Article 20 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/365650; this version posted July 9, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 21 Abstract 22 Rare and ecologically specialized species are at greater risk of extinction. Rarity in terms of low 23 genotypic diversity may be obscured in sessile foundation species that can reproduce asexually. 24 Asexual propagules are often only distinguishable from sexual recruits through molecular tools. 25 Thus, molecular markers are necessary to assess genotypic variation and population structure in 26 clonal organisms such as corals. The global decline of corals has necessitated marker 27 development for improved conservation of rare coral species. We infer past demographic 28 changes, describe modern population structure, and quantify asexual reproduction of the 29 uncommon Caribbean pillar coral, Dendrogyra cylindrus and its endosymbiotic dinoflagellate, 30 Symbiodinium dendrogyrum using de novo microsatellite markers. Results show that D. 31 cylindrus comprises three distinct populations in the Caribbean whereas the symbiont was 32 differentiated into four populations. Thus, barriers to gene flow differ between host and 33 symbiont. In Florida, host and symbiont reproduced mainly asexually, yielding lower genotypic 34 diversity than predicted from census size. Models of past demographic events revealed no 35 evidence of historical changes in population size, consistent with the geological record of D. 36 cylindrus indicating it has been rare for hundreds of thousands of years. The most recent global 37 thermal stress event triggered a severe disease outbreak among D. cylindrus in Florida, resulting 38 in a precipitous population decline. Projections indicate a high likelihood that this species may 39 become locally extinct within the coming decades. The ecosystem consequences of losing rare 40 coral species and their symbionts with increasingly frequent extreme warming events are not 41 known but require urgent study. 42 2 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/365650; this version posted July 9, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 43 Introduction 44 Ecologically rare species are predicted to be more vulnerable to environmental change 45 and are at greater risks of extinction with shifts in climate (Caughley, 1994; Davies et al., 2004; 46 McKinney, 1997). Species are rare because they may inhabit narrow geographic ranges, occupy 47 few specific habitats, and/or exhibit low abundance in nature (Rabinowitz, 1981). It is sometimes 48 presumed that rare species tend to be competitively inferior, although work on sparse and 49 common grasses does not support this conclusion (Rabinowitz et al., 1984). Regardless, there are 50 obvious consequences to having low population densities, including difficulties finding a mate 51 (Stephens & Sutherland, 1999) and vulnerability to genetic drift (Ellstrand & Elam, 1993). 52 However, there are many rare species that are adapted to low population densities (de Lange & 53 Norton, 2004; Flather & Sieg, 2007), and these species persist for long periods of evolutionary 54 time. 55 The persistence of rare species is further challenged when they are obligate partners of 56 specific symbionts. The endangered terrestrial orchid Caladenia huegelii associates with a 57 specific mycorrhizal fungus throughout its range (Swarts et al., 2010). This specificity between 58 partners has caused C. huegelii to be rare due to the limited suitable environmental conditions of 59 the mycorrhiza. Thus, the strict niche characteristics of one partner in a symbiosis may drive the 60 scarcity of the other. Further, intra-specific diversity in both partners and fidelity of genotype- 61 genotype associations can play a role in how the symbiosis responds to changing conditions 62 (Baums et al., 2014b; Parkinson et al., 2015; Parkinson & Baums, 2014). 63 Because sessile organisms often reproduce by asexual fragmentation, the relative rarity of 64 these species may be obscured by an apparently large census size. Thus, molecular markers are 3 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/365650; this version posted July 9, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 65 necessary to distinguish individuals and provide a way of measuring the genotypic diversity of 66 populations. There are clear consequences to being a clonal, rare species that is self- 67 incompatible. Clonal populations of the rare dwarf shrub Linnaea borealis had low reproductive 68 success due to a lack of nearby conspecifics, leading to increased geitonogamy (Scobie & 69 Wilcock, 2009). Likewise, the aquatic plant Decodon verticillatus had reduced sexual 70 reproduction in clonal populations at the northern range limit (Dorken & Eckert, 2001). 71 However, extensive clonal reproduction can also be beneficial, especially for rare species, by 72 maintaining population sizes despite a lack of sexual recruitment. Clonal reproduction was the 73 driver of stable population size in the threatened, endemic columnar cactus Stenocereus eruca 74 (Clark-Tapia et al., 2005). No sexual seedlings were observed during the study. Thus, clonal 75 propagation can provide a “storage effect” by increasing the persistence of individual genotypes 76 when the influx of sexual recruits is low or absent due to unfavorable environmental conditions 77 (Boulay et al., 2014; Warner & Chesson, 1985). This storage effect is most pronounced when 78 adults are long-lived, reproductive output is high, and population densities are low – such as in 79 some mass-spawning corals – and thus may play an important role in maintaining intraspecies 80 diversity (Baums et al., 2014a; Baums et al., 2006; Boulay et al., 2014). 81 While many marine invertebrates produce planktonic larvae and hence have great 82 potential to disperse over large areas, species differ significantly in their abundance. Populations 83 of rare marine species may become fragmented more easily, reducing connectivity and 84 increasing extinction risk. Indeed populations of rare marine sponges (Scopalina lophyropoda) 85 are highly structured, likely due to limited larval dispersal (Blanquer & Uriz, 2010). Despite high 86 larval retention, populations of S. lophyropoda are not inbred, indicating that this species 87 maintains genetic diversity despite low abundance. In recent coral surveys throughout the 4 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/365650; this version posted July 9, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 88 Caribbean, some species were consistently more abundant (e.g. Orbicella faveolata), while 89 others were rare, such as the pillar coral Dendrogyra cylindrus (Edmunds et al., 1990; S. Miller 90 et al., 2013; Steiner & Kerr, 2008; Ward et al., 2006). The fossil record supports the relative 91 rarity of D. cylindrus through time, although there is localized evidence that pillar corals were 92 more prevalent on Pleistocene reefs (Hunter & Jones, 1996). Corals in the genus Dendrogyra 93 only appear 29 times in the Paleobiology Database, whereas there are 278 Acropora palmata 94 fossils, 111 Orbicella faveolata fossils, and 160 Meandrina (a sister genus to Dendrogyra) 95 fossils (paleobiodb.org, accessed 18 February 2018). 96 D. cylindrus forms an obligate symbiosis with another rare species, Symbiodinium 97 dendrogyrum (A. Lewis et al. in review). In recent surveys of Caribbean corals, S. dendrogyrum 98 (formerly ITS2 type B1k) was only found associated with D. cylindrus, indicating that it has a 99 narrow habitat range (Finney et al., 2010). Increasing rarity of one species will likely lead to 100 subsequent rarity in the other mutualistic

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    47 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us