LEGACY OF THE PACIFIC WAR: 75 YEARS LATER August 2020 The Legacy of the Philippine Struggle for Independence in 1945 By Diana Villiers Negroponte he Battle for Manila in February 1945 and over the course of 29 days, 100,000 Filipinos demonstrated the horrors of war. Japanese were killed. Historians assign the greater blame forces under Admiral Sanji Iwabuchi to the Japanese troops instructed to instill terror determined to hold the city and prevent General in the local population through starvation, torture, DouglasT MacArthur moving north toward Japan. and murder. It must also be acknowledged that the The Admiral rejected General Yamashita and General advancing U.S. forces used heavy artillery to destroy MacArthur’s call for an ‘open city’ which would have buildings and Japanese gun emplacements, killing protected the million or more citizens of Manila. men, women and children caught in the crossfire. Instead, he instructed his forces to fight to the last In the annals of World War II, the battle for Manila man and die protecting the Emperor. MacArthur, stands at the nadir of human destruction. Asia on the other side, was determined to relieve the Program What legacies can we take away from the battle city and the thousands of prisoners of war, interned and the struggle to create a postwar democratic Americans, and other citizens. The clash was brutal government in the Philippines? What were the Asia Program underlying stresses as General MacArthur strove country toward independence. Upon his return to give the Filipino people their independence? to Manila, the exiled Commonwealth president, How did Philippine leaders balance American- Sergio Osmeña sought to reinstitute the American styled liberal democracy against the Marxist pattern of education and expunge all remnants of ideology of their own guerilla leaders who had Japanese indoctrination. He proposed the creation fought tenaciously against the Japanese? In the of a People’s Court to investigate all Filipinos aftermath of that war, what was the nature of the suspected of disloyalty or treason and he issued U.S.-Philippine relationship and what tensions a victory currency to stabilize the economy. In continue to this day? his mind, Philippine independence should arrive on August 13, 1945 and in support of this, he Manila, known as the Pearl of the Orient, was a emphasized that “It is part and parcel of that city of decaying corpses, contaminated water, patriotic course to secure the rehabilitation of the and stone rubble when the last Japanese left Philippines, the recognition of its independence, the city on February 29, 1945. Those Filipino and the protection of that independence against all families who had collaborated with the Japanese external aggression.” The U.S. Congress, however, occupiers feared that the Americans would postponed the date for Philippine independence put them on trial. They had grown up under a by 11 months. Commonwealth, created by President Roosevelt in 1935 to provide transitional governance from Another prominent man sought leadership of colony to future independence. Under the the Philippines. During the war, Manuel A. Roxas Commonwealth, Philippine leaders had copied had both collaborated with the Japanese and U.S. political institutions, laws, and many of its provided critical information to MacArthur. This liberal values. Their admiration for America was dual role gained the opprobrium of many of his intense, but when Japan invaded in 1942, they own countrymen, but MacArthur’s admiration for witnessed MacArthur retreat from the Philippines. his energy, relative youth, and intelligence. When The landed elite survived by sharing their wealth MacArthur returned to Manila in 1945, Roxas with the occupying army and either informing became his preferred candidate. So admired was against or working with Philippine guerilla forces, the American general that critics quietened their later to become the Hukbalahap or “Huks.” One grumblings about the ascendency of a man who of their own, the former associate justice of the claimed to have fought with the Huks against Commonwealth’s Supreme Court, Jose Laurel, the Japanese, despite the absence of supporting became president of the “independent” Philippine evidence. Determined to complete the promised Republic—a mere puppet of General Yamashita. independence, MacArthur ignored complaints that More than half of the Commonwealth’s Senate he relied upon the ilustrados whose loyalty during and over on-third of its House of Representatives the war was questionable. Instead, he looked for served in the Japanese-sponsored regime. When men who could govern, invest and rebuild the the war ended, intense debate surrounded the country. U.S. High Commissioner Paul McNutt role that the ilustrados or Filipino elite should play questioned the speed with which MacArthur in the future governance of their nation. sought to transfer governance, knowing the depth and scope of the elite’s corrupt practices, but his The post-war challenge facing both MacArthur word carried little weight against the 5-star general and the Filipinos was who should lead their who had repelled the Japanese in the Pacific and 2 LEGACY OF THE PACIFIC WAR: 75 YEARS LATER would exercise almost unlimited power in Tokyo. in which the U.S. had virtual territorial rights. A commission was sent out from Washington to Philippine President Sergio Osmeña was so eager examine the practices of the landed and banking to keep the Americans in the Philippines that he ilustrados, but its critical report was shelved did not impose any restrictions on the size of as President Truman focused on a new threat: U.S. forces nor their deployment. In Manila, the communism. legislature followed suit, approving the agreement without a dissenting voice. Across the Philippines, the Huks—Philippine guerilla fighters who had fought plantation owners However, in the early days of the Alliance, who mistreated sharecroppers and peons— Philippine leaders felt slighted that the terms of had maintained an armed resistance against the treaty compared less favorably than the terms the Japanese occupation. They had become of basing rights the United States had offered to the nucleus of a communist insurgency in the Japan. As told by Stanley Karnow in his book In Philippines with the aid of Marxist propaganda Our Image: America’s Empire in the Philippines, supplied by Moscow. Former guerilla fighters with this resentment was inflamed in 1953 when the socialist ideas joined with Marxists in following chief U.S. negotiator pushed a piece of paper Vicente Lava, a charismatic leader and a brilliant under the nose of Senator Emmanuel Pelaez chemist with a degree from Columbia University. saying, “Here is your position.” Pelaez, who later He merged his socialist followers with war trained became Vice President, stalked out of the room, guerilla troops under the peasant leadership delaying the talks for two years. Despite of Marxist, Luis Taruc. Together, they fought an American high-handedness, the bases played an insurgency against landowners allied with the important role when the Cold War called for the Japanese, as well as the U.S.-allied government. stationing of U.S. forces in the Pacific. However, For Washington, corruption in Manila became the indignity to Philippine sovereignty and the acceptable in the fight against the communist behavior of American service members off-base insurgents. By 1951, this revolutionary force haunted bilateral relations until 1991, when the justified the US and the Philippines signing a Philippine Senate failed to achieve enough votes to Mutual Defense Treaty that recalled “with mutual renew the post-war bases agreement. pride the historic relationship which brought Beyond the closest military cooperation their two peoples together in a common bond of between the two countries, Osmeña sought sympathy and mutual ideals to fight side-by-side U.S. war-damage payments and in May 1945, against imperialist aggression during the last war.” the Commonwealth government obtained from The collective security agreement committed both President Truman a “preliminary statement” parties “for full security for the Philippines, for the which committed the United States to grant 1 mutual protection of the Islands and the United million Philippine pesos for the maintenance of States, and for the future maintenance of peace in roads and bridges and 168,000 pesos ($604,569 the Pacific.” in today’s U.S. dollars) for the repair and operation In return for U.S. protection and funding, the of irrigation systems and river control. The U.S. Philippine government gave the United States a government also committed to sending over 99-year lease on several military and naval bases 600,000 metric tons of food, as well as clothing, 3 LEGACY OF THE PACIFIC WAR: 75 YEARS LATER medical supplies, construction materials, that dependence on American financial support production equipment, household items, and became indispensable. Additionally, enduring utensils. Truman recognized the need to contribute social inequity forced many of their young to handsomely toward post-war reconstruction. The emigrate and work abroad as ‘overseas workers.’ U.S. Congress, however, was less generous in What is the nature of U.S.-Philippine relations awarding pensions to the Filipino soldiers who had today? What leverage can the current president, acted as scouts and fought alongside GIs. Rodrigo Duterte, exercise in Philippine relations The Philippines gained independence on July 4 with both the United States and China? Today, 1946, but, in practice, the former colony remained the Philippines is torn between its historical “neocolonized.” Aside from a few ultra-nationalists, respect for the Americans and its desire to be Filipinos generally welcomed the special truly independent. The Mutual Defense Treaty of relationship as proof of America’s concern for 1951 remains in effect with Article IV providing their welfare. They had learned and experienced for collective defense in the event of an attack American liberal democracy for a decade or more by outside forces.