Irradiated Homograft Rib Cartilage in Facial Reconstruction

Irradiated Homograft Rib Cartilage in Facial Reconstruction

ORIGINAL ARTICLE Irradiated Homograft Rib Cartilage in Facial Reconstruction Alan J. C. Burke, MD; Tom D. Wang, MD; Ted A. Cook, MD Objective: To evaluate long-term structural, func- Minor resorption without change in form or function tional, and cosmetic results as well as resorption with the was found in 29% (30/102) of the cases. Loss of sup- use of irradiated homologous rib cartilage grafts (IHRGs). port, which was related more to graft displacement rather than resorption, was identified in 19% (21/109) Design: Cases in which IHRGs were used were re- of the cases, and loss of support affecting cosmesis was viewed for a long-term follow-up study for nasal and au- observed in 8% (9/109) of the cases. Maintenance of ricular reconstruction, dating back 18 years. A retrospec- form and function appeared to be unrelated to the tive medical chart review was conducted in the cases in amount of resorption noted for the nasal grafts but was which the patients had returned for clinical examina- significant for the auricular grafts (PϽ.01). tion with photographic documentation. Conclusions: The longevity of IHRGs has been favor- Results: A total of 118 patients who had undergone able for functional, structural, and cosmetic nasal recon- nasal reconstruction with a mean follow-up of 36 struction, with low levels of resorption identified clini- months were identified from our database. There were cally. The use of IHRGs was associated with an 12 patients who had undergone auricular reconstruc- unacceptable rate of graft failure in auricular reconstruc- tion, with a mean follow-up of 82 months. Resorption tion; therefore, they are no longer selected for use in such with compromise in cosmesis was noted in 11% (11/ cases. 102) of the grafts used in nasal reconstruction but in 71% (5/7) of those used in auricular reconstruction. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2004;6:334-341 HE USE OF IRRADIATED CAR- tained using 398 homografts preserved in tilage in facial reconstruc- merthiosaline implanted into various sites tion remains controversial in 353 patients. Of this group, only 49 pa- despite its use for many tients, representing 59 transplants, were years. The controversy cen- formally evaluated, with follow-up rang- Tters on the issue of resorption. The histo- ing from 2 to 18 years. Of the 59 trans- logic examination of implants has re- plants evaluated, 7 (12%) failed because vealed varying levels of resorption and of infection or hematoma. Bulk was main- fibrous replacement in both animal and tained without evidence of loss in 19 cases human studies; for this reason, Welling (32%), and some degree of resorption oc- et al1 advised against the use of irradiated curred in 33 (56%) cases. Fair to excel- homologous rib cartilage grafts (IHRGs) lent cosmetic results owing to fibrous tis- for long-term structural support. Other fac- sue replacement were seen in 25 (76%) of tors, such as site of implantation and de- the 33 cases in which there was resorp- gree of fibrous tissue replacement, how- tion. Overall, 38 (77%) of the 49 patients ever, may be important for the ultimate were satisfied with the cosmetic result. success of these grafts.2 The greater issue Welling et al1 reported the findings of long- is whether structural, functional, and cos- term follow-up on irradiated homografts metic restoration can be maintained over implanted into various regions of the face. time. The clinical use of IHRGs should be In their study, 42 of 107 patients, repre- based on these criteria. senting 62 of 145 grafts, were evaluated Clinical studies have shown conflict- by physical examination with compari- ing results. Dingman and Grabb3 re- son photographs. Follow-up averaged 9 From the Department of Facial ported resorption in only 2 of 30 irradi- years and was correlated with the degree Plastic Surgery, Virginia Ear, ated cartilage homografts implanted into of resorption. The average resorption rate Nose, and Throat Associates, Richmond (Dr Burke); and various sites. The 2 cases of resorption oc- was 75%. Complete resorption was found the Division of Facial Plastic curred in auricular reconstruction. Only in 18 of 24 grafts, with follow-up of more Surgery, Oregon Health & 30 of 70 patients were available for evalu- than 11 years. Specific data on the degree Science University, Portland ation, and follow-up ranged from 7 months of patient satisfaction were not reported, 4 (Drs Wang and Cook). to 31⁄2 years. Rasi reported the results ob- but it has been noted that cartilage resorp- (REPRINTED) ARCH FACIAL PLAST SURG/ VOL 6, SEP/OCT 2004 WWW.ARCHFACIAL.COM 334 ©2004 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 09/27/2021 tion did not necessarily correlate with poor patient sat- Rib cartilage, harvested from young cadaveric donors, was ob- isfaction.5 In the above-mentioned studies, preserved car- tained from the Oregon Tissue Bank, Portland. The cartilage was tilage grafts were placed into multiple sites in the face. then exposed to a minimum of 1.5ϫ106 rad (15000 Gy) of ra- Several authors believe that the site of implantation diation and stored in sterile isotonic sodium chloride solution. strongly influences the long-term stability of these grafts. The outer cortex of the rib was removed from the grafts at the 6 time of implantation to prevent warping. Dorsal grafts, caudal Kridel and Konior reported the results of 306 grafts used struts, tip grafts, lateral onlay grafts, and spreader grafts were used in 122 nasal augmentation procedures, with follow-up for nasal reconstruction. Dorsal grafts were 3.5 to 4.5 cm in length, ranging from 1 to 84 months. Resorption occurred in only 5 to 6 mm in height, and 10 to 12 mm in width. Caudal struts 4 grafts, and infection was thought to be the cause in 2 were 3.0 to 3.5 cm in height, 2 to 3 mm in width, and up to 10 of them. Donald2 reported similar observations. In his ex- mm in length. Dorsal grafts were placed over the remaining sep- perience, grafts placed over the nasal dorsum and malar tum or soft tissue and tucked superiorly into a subperiosteal eminence showed little resorption, while those placed un- pocket. Caudal struts were placed into a snug intercrural pocket der mimetic musculature tended to resorb. dissected onto the maxillary crest. When possible, the other grafts The ear is another implantation site that has been were stabilized by placement into precisely created pockets. associated with an increased incidence of resorption. The Auricular reconstruction involved creating a template of 3 irradiated cartilage based on the size of the contralateral un- 2 cases of resorption reported by Dingman and Grabb involved ear. The template, which was created with 2 to 3 pieces occurred in auricular reconstruction. In a review of the of cartilage held together with sutures, was then placed into a world literature on auricular reconstruction conducted subcutaneous pocket. This procedure was done as the initial by Berghaus and Toplak,7 cases of resorption were re- stage along with removal of any vestigial native cartilage. Early ported with “striking frequency,” and in some series, re- in the course of the study, tissue expanders were placed as the sorption occurred in as many as 100% of the cases. Based first stage but were abandoned because of the high rate of ex- on their review, they concluded that preserved cartilage trusion. Later stages involved release of the ear with place- grafts could not be recommended for auricular recon- ment of a skin graft and repositioning of the lobule. struction. Irradiated homologous cartilage grafts have been used at Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, for many RESULTS years, predominantly in the reconstruction of nasal de- fects. The objectives of this retrospective study were to The database identified 193 patients who had under- determine the longevity of functional, structural, and cos- gone nasal reconstruction and 12 patients who had un- metic results and to make recommendations regarding dergone auricular reconstruction with IHRGs. Ad- the use of IHRGs. equate follow-up information was available for 118 patients (61%) who had undergone nasal reconstruc- METHODS tion. There were 56 female patients (mean age, 46.2 years) A computerized database has been used for the past 18 years and 62 male patients (mean age, 44.0 years). The mean to record patient and surgical data in cases in which IRHGs were follow-up period for each patient was 361⁄4 months (range, used. A retrospective medical chart review included only those 1-216 months). The mean follow-up periods were strati- patients whose charts contained both definitive information re- fied into smaller groups: 3.3 months (n=17), 9.4 months garding graft resorption and postoperative photographs. The (n=30), 15.8 months (n=19), 25.0 months (n=33), 79.8 surgical results were evaluated by history and by comparison months (n=19), and 138 months (n=3). of standardized preoperative and available postoperative pho- The most common cause of the nasal deformity was tographs. Outcome was determined for individual grafts and trauma (Table 1). Nine cases involved complex recon- for the overall success of the reconstruction in individual pa- tients. Each graft was evaluated clinically for the degree of sub- structions requiring replacement of skin in addition to jective resorption by comparing the latest photograph with the cartilaginous support. Thirty-one cases were revisions for earliest postoperative photograph, taken at 3 months. The re- reconstructions performed elsewhere, 18 of which had sorption was then graded as none (0%-25%), partial (26%- involved the use of implants. Previously used implants 75%), or total (Ͼ75%). Charted information from the postop- included autogenous rib, irradiated rib, Silastic, ivory, iliac erative office visits was also reviewed.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    8 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us