Homo Sapiens} Facial Attractiveness and Sexual Selection: the Role of Symmetry and Averageness

Homo Sapiens} Facial Attractiveness and Sexual Selection: the Role of Symmetry and Averageness

Copyright 1994 by the American Psychological Association, Inc. Journal of Comparative Psychology 0735-7036W/$3.00 1994, Vol. 108, No. 3, 233-242 Human (Homo sapiens} Facial Attractiveness and Sexual Selection: The Role of Symmetry and Averageness Karl Grammer and Randy Thornhill We hypothesized from the parasite theory of sexual selection that men (Homo sapiens) would prefer averageness and symmetry in women's faces, that women would prefer averageness and symmetry in men's faces, and that women would prefer largeness (not averageness) of the secondary sexual traits of men's faces. We generated computer images of men's and women's faces and of composites of the faces of each sex, and then had men and women rate opposite-sex faces for 4 variables (attractive, dominant, sexy, and healthy). Symmetry, averageness, and the sizes of facial features were measured on the computerized faces. The hypotheses were supported, with the exception of the hypothesized effects of averageness of female and male faces on attractiveness ratings. This is the first study to show that facial symmetry has a positive influence on facial attractiveness ratings. Although adult facial attractiveness ratings are replicable, facial blemishes, and therefore one of these traits, rather even cross-culturally (see reviews and discussions in Jones than averageness per se, may be the cause of the enhanced & Hill, 1993, and Langlois & Roggman, 1990), there has attractiveness of composites. In addition, Alley and Cun- been considerable controversy around attempts to identify ningham emphasize that there is considerable evidence in research the facial features that actually cause faces to be (e.g., Keating, 1985) that the most sexually attractive male judged attractive or unattractive. As discussed by Langlois faces are those that show extremes, not averageness, in and Roggman, studies of individual facial features (e.g., certain features (e.g., wide jaw), felt to be perceived as nose size) often have yielded inconsistent results between dominance indicators. Our study of the cross-sex attractive- studies. Faces created by combining individual faces into ness ratings of faces of both sexes attempts to clarify adult composites have been shown to be more attractive than the facial beauty by examining the roles of facial symmetry and individual faces, which is felt to be a preference for average averageness and their interaction with individual dimen- facial features (Langlois & Roggman, 1990; Symons, sions of the face. 1979). Averageness effaces can be calculated metrically or We use the theoretical framework of sexual selection. The constructed photogrammetrically. Gallon (1879) con- prominent theory of sexual selection is the parasite theory, structed composites of individual pictures with the photo- which proposes that sexual selection favors those traits that graphic method of simply projecting them one over the advertise resistance to parasites, both microparasites, such other on a negative. According to Gallon, this method as bacteria and viruses, and macroparasites, such as nema- "enables us to obtain with mechanical precision a general- todes and protozoa (Hamilton & Zuk, 1982). There is con- ized picture; one that represents no man in particular, but siderable evidence that parasite-resistant organisms win in portrays an imaginary figure possessing the average features competition for mates, both in intrasexual competition (usu- of any given group of man" (1879, p. 341). Indeed, Treu ally males competing for females) and in being chosen by (1914) had the impression that these composites are "sin- the opposite sex and that secondary sexual traits advertise gularly beautiful" (p. 441). However, as Alley and Cunning- parasite resistance (see partial reviews in Hausfater & ham (1991; see also Benson & Perrett, 1991) pointed out, Thornhill, 1990, and Zuk, 1992). According to the parasite composites are also more symmetrical and rather free of theory of sexual selection, mate choice decisions include medical examinations of potential mates, and parasite- Karl Grammer, Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Urban Ethology, resistant organisms are preferred because they produce ge- Vienna, Austria; Randy Thornhill, Department of Biology, Uni- netically resistant offspring or provide better parental care versity of New Mexico. to the offspring. Thus, the parasite theory proposes that We thank Klaus Atzwanger, John Dittami, Steve Gangestad, Joy beauty of bodily form is perceived as a cue to high parasite Ingram, Kurt McKean, and Don Symons for helpful comments on resistance by animals in choosing mates. the research. Randy Thornhill thanks Klaus Atzwanger and John Secondary sexual characters are evolved outcomes of Dittami for their hospitality in Vienna. Anne Rice's help with the preparation of the article is appreciated. sexual selection. There is a link between parasite resistance Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to and secondary sexual traits because sex hormones, espe- Karl Grammer, Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Urban Ethology, cially testosterone, lower immunocompetence (Folstad & Althanstrasse 14, A-1090 Vienna, Austria or to Randy Thornhill, Karter, 1992; Wedekind, 1992). Whereas high liters of Department of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, testosterone are necessary for the production of large sec- New Mexico 87131-1091. Electronic mail may be sent to ondary sexual trails, there will necessarily be a positive [email protected]. correlation between developmenl of secondary sexual 233 234 KARL GRAMMER AND RANDY THORNHILL traits and the quality of the immune system; only healthy shown to affect differentially the development of symmetry organisms can afford the high testosterone handicap on in organisms' traits, and the symmetry of secondary sexual the immune system that is necessary for the production of traits is most negatively influenced (M011er, 1992; M011er & elaborate sexual traits (Folstad & Karter, 1992). The hu- Pomiankowski, 1993; Watson & Thornhill, 1994). Symme- man face contains secondary sexual traits, that is, facial try of facial secondary sexual traits may display immuno- features that develop or increase in size at puberty under competence because the construction of such traits, espe- the influence of the sex hormones, androgens and estro- cially large ones, is expected to require more sex hormone gens. Enlarged jaws, chins, and cheekbones in men are (Thornhill & Gangestad, 1993). examples of facial secondary sexual traits that are influ- In this article we test the following hypotheses about enced by testosterone (Enlow, 1990; Tanner, 1978), and facial attractiveness, which arise from these considerations: Thornhill and Gangestad (1993) hypothesized that large- (a) Men prefer averageness and symmetry in women's ness in these features are considered sexually attractive faces; (b) women prefer averageness and symmetry in because of advertised immunocompetence. men's faces; and (c) women prefer extreme expression of Genetic diversity may be an important defense against the secondary sexual traits of men's faces. Our approach parasites, both at the between-organisms level (i.e., the uses computer techniques to measure composite and indi- population level) and at the within-organisms level (see vidual faces to assess the influence of averageness, symme- review in Thornhill & Gangestad, 1993; see also Hamilton, try, and facial dimensions in facial attractiveness judgments. 1982; Tooby, 1982). Within-organisms genetic diversity is dependent on individual genetic heterozygosity. For herita- ble traits that are continuously distributed, heterozygosity Method correlates positively with average trait expression (Soule & Rating Study Cuzin-Roudy, 1982). Facial attractiveness is continuously distributed and probably is heritable (see Thornhill & The raters of computerized faces were 52 female and 44 male Gangestad, 1993). This implies that average values of facial college students (Homo sapiens) from a German university. The features reflect high heterozygosity. Thus, Thornhill and digitized facial pictures were presented to each subject individu- Gangestad hypothesized that facial averageness is attractive ally by an interactive computer program. Order effects of presen- because of its association with heterozygosity and thus tation were controlled by presenting faces to raters in a randomized parasite resistance. This hypothesized pattern may primarily order. In a first run the program showed all pictures to each subject apply to female faces. The intrasexual sexual competition sequentially. In a second run the subject rated each picture for 11 component of sexual selection involving dominance and adjectives on a rating scale from 1 (least) to 7 (most). The adjectives and their accompanying rating scales were displayed combat has worked more strongly on males than on females randomly with each picture at the bottom of the computer screen. in human evolutionary history (Darwin, 1871; Symons, The subjects were allowed to view pictures as long as they wished. 1979), and male faces have multiple, testosterone-facilitated For this study only 4 of the 11 adjectives were used: attractive, secondary sexual traits (viz., adult male chin, cheekbones, dominant, sexy, and healthy. The subjects were trained interac- brow ridge, and jaw) that are expected by the parasite theory tively by the computer before making ratings until they were able to have evolved to signal health-related dominance by large- to solve the rating

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    10 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us