Effect of a Magnetic Water Treatment on Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Precipitation of Calcium Carbonate

Effect of a Magnetic Water Treatment on Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Precipitation of Calcium Carbonate

ARTICLE IN PRESS WATER RESEARCH 40 (2006) 1941– 1950 Available at www.sciencedirect.com journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/watres Effect of a magnetic water treatment on homogeneous and heterogeneous precipitation of calcium carbonate Alimi Fathia,b, Tlili Mohameda, Gabrielli Claudeb, Georges Maurinb,Ã, Ben Amor Mohameda aLaboratoire de Ge´ochimie et Physicochimie de l’Eau, Institut Nationale de la Recherche Scientifique et Technique, BP 95, 2050 Hammam-Lif, Tunisia bLaboratoire Interfaces et Syste`me E´ lectrochimie (LISE), UPR15 du CNRS, Universite´ P. et M. Curie, Tour 22, 5e e´tage, 4 Place Jussieu, 75252 Paris Cedex 05, France article info ABSTRACT Article history: In this paper are reported experimental results on the effect of a magnetic field on the Received 5 October 2005 precipitation process of calcium carbonate scale from a hard water. Carbonically pure Received in revised form water was circulated at a constant flow rate in a magnetic field. After this treatment, 6 March 2006 calcium carbonate precipitation was induced by degassing dissolved carbonic gas. The Accepted 7 March 2006 nucleation time was identified from the variations of the pH and the Ca2+ concentration. The ratio between homogeneous and heterogeneous nucleation was determined from the Keywords: measurement of the mass of precipitated calcium carbonate. Water treatment It is shown that the magnetic treatment increases the total amount of precipitate. This Magnetic field effect depends on the solution pH, the flow rate and the duration of the treatment. In Calcium carbonate precipitation addition, the magnetic treatment modifies the ratio between homogeneous/heterogeneous Degasification nucleation. Homogeneous nucleation is promoted by an increasing the pH of water, the Homogeneous flow rate as well as the residence time. The magnetic treatment enhances these effects Heterogeneous nucleation with a maximum for a 15 min treatment time. It is shown that the presence of calcium carbonate colloid particles is not necessary. It is advanced that the main magnetic effects concern the associations of ionic species which are present in the solution and which are involved in the nucleation process of calcium carbonate precipitation & 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction device was patented in Belgium in 1945 (Vemeiren, 1958). Powerful electromagnets were used in hot water systems The antiscale magnetic treatment (AMT) of hard waters is since the 1960s in the Soviet Union (Grutsch, 1977). The currently used to prevent the build up of deposits on the walls application of AMT was reported in the United States since of industrial systems, in particular in heat exchangers, as well 1975 (Grutsch, 1977; Grutsch and McClintock, 1984). In many in domestic equipments (Proceedings of the International cases, the field is delivered by permanent magnets in various meeting of Antiscale magnetic treatment, 1996; MAG 3, 1999). geometrical configurations. Several devices are based on AC This kind of physical treatment presents the great advantage or pulsed fields. (Oshitani et al., 1999). According to the review to avoid the use of chemicals such as strong acids or paper of Baker and Judd (1996), in spite of this long polyphosphates which are expensive and can be harmful for experience, the efficiency of this treatment is still a con- human life or deleterious for the environment. AMT has been troversial question and it is not possible to get a clear employed for more than a half century. The first commercial explanation of the phenomenon. ÃCorresponding author. Fax: +33 1 44 27 40 74. E-mail address: [email protected] (G. Maurin). 0043-1354/$ - see front matter & 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2006.03.013 ARTICLE IN PRESS 1942 WATER RESEARCH 40 (2006) 1941– 1950 A great number of experimental researches were carried out In a previous work (Gabrielli et al., 2001), the scaling power of a on the modification of the CaCO3 precipitation process by AMT. magnetically treated water was evaluated by mean of an In most cases, a supersaturated solution was prepared by the electrochemical method. The crystal growth rate was directly ‘‘double decomposition method’’, by mixing two equimolar measured with an electrochemical quartz crystal microbalance. solutions of CaCl2 and Na2CO3, respectively, but this method It was shown that the field strength, the composition and the presents the drawback to introduce systematically an excess flow velocity of the water have significant effects on the scaling of foreign Na2+ and ClÀ ions which increase the conductivity. rate. The nature of the material of the tubing, in which the MF Various electrochemical and non-electrochemical techniques was applied, appeared also to have an influence on AMT. It was were used to estimate the scaling potentiality of water (Hui deduced that electrokinetic phenomena occurring in the vicinity and Le´dion, 2002). In the electrochemical methods, the strong of the walls of the tubing could be also implied (Gabrielli et al., increase of the interfacial pH on the cathode plate due to the 2001). However, it could be objected that the electrochemical reduction of dissolved oxygen induced the heterogeneous precipitation test induces exclusively an heterogeneous nuclea- nucleation of calcium carbonate. The scaling rate can be tion by a strong interfacial pH shift, this could be in contra- evaluated from the decrease of the electrochemical current diction with what happens in usual conditions where the intensity (Le´dion et al., 1985), by measuring the deposited homogeneous and heterogeneous precipitation are mainly due mass thanks to a quartz crystal microbalance (Gabrielli et al., to the escape of carbonic gas from the water, under the effect 1996b), or even by performing electrochemical impedance either of a change of pressure or an increase of the temperature. analysis (Gabrielli et al., 1996a; Deslouis et al., 1997). Among For this reason, the experimental works which are presented the non-electrochemical methods, some of them consist in in this paper were performed with the same magnetic treatment forcing the calcium carbonate precipitation by increasing the system which proved its efficiency, but the scaling potentiality of pH, some other are based on the heating or the evaporation of the treated water was evaluated by inducing the calcium the solution (Euvrard et al., 1997). carbonate precipitation by a method based on the extraction of According to the literature, the efficiency of the magnetic dissolved carbonic gas. From the measurement of the variations treatment depends on numerous parameters. For example, of the solution pH, the Ca2+ concentration, and the mass of the Chibowski et al. (2003) or Barrett and Parsons (1998) have homogeneous precipitate, it was possible to evaluate the effect observed that a magnetic treatment applied during on a hard ofthemagnetictreatmentonthenucleationtimeandonboth water decreased the quantity of scale deposited on the wall. the homogeneous and heterogeneous precipitation rates. The The principle of the phenomenon is still not well understood morphology of the two kinds of precipitate was examined by and various contradictory hypotheses were proposed. It was SEM. Their crystal structure was identified by X-ray diffraction. often attributed to the Lorentz forces ~F ¼ q Á ~v  ~B exerted either on moving ions or on charged solid particles (Higa- shitani et al., 1993). The magnetic field (MF) would be able to 2. Experimental disturb the double ionic layer surrounding the colloidal particles and their zeta potential (Gamayunov, 1983; Higa- 2.1. Water preparation shitani and Oshitani, 1998; Parsons et al., 1997). According to several authors (Higashitani et al., 1993; Barrett and Parsons, In order to avoid any side effect by foreign ions, calcocarbo- 1998), the MF would tend to reduce the nucleation rate and to nically pure water (CCP water), (water containing only Ca2+, 2À À accelerate the crystal growth. Ferreux assumed that the free CO3 and HCO3 ions) was used. It was prepared by dissolving À1 enthalpy of calcium carbonate formation would be modified 0.3 to 0.5 g dm reagent grade CaCO3 in deionized water, by by the MF (Ferreux, 1992). The scale modification could also bubbling carbon dioxide during a full day according to result from the preferential formation of the aragonite CO þ H O þ CaCO ! Ca2þ þ 2HCO À: (1) polymorph (Coey and Cass, 2000; Knez and Pohar, 2005; Kobe 2 2 3 3 1 et al., 2001), which is usually formed above 60 C, instead of This dissolved CaCO3 quantity is equivalent to a water calcite. Aragonite, which may result from the transformation hardness of 30–50 French Degrees (1 1F corresponds to À3 of metastable vaterite nuclei (Gabrielli et al., 1999), exhibits a 10 mg dm of dissolved CaCO3). This hardness can be characteristic needle shape morphology with a rather weak considered as moderate by comparison with the values used adhesion to the substrate. Therefore, they could be carried by many authors (Chibowski et al., 2003; Higashitani et al., away by the liquid flow (Kronenberg, 1985). On the contrary, 1993; Higashitani and Oshitani, 1998; Knez and Pohar, 2005). calcite which is the more stable calcium carbonate poly- The water pH resulting from this preparation was about 5.7. morph at room temperature (Plumber and Busenberg, 1982), Then, the calcocarbonic equilibrium was displaced towards forms dense and tenacious layers, which are difficult to supersaturation by adjusting the pH between 6 and 7.5 thanks remove mechanically. It was

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    10 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us