Management 2012, 2(4): 113-117 DOI: 10.5923/j.mm.20120204.05 Brainstorming Savanam Chandra Sekhar*, K. Lidiya Department of Business Administration, St. Ann’s College of Engineering & Technology, Chirala, Vetapalem, 523 187, India Abstract Creativity can be taught. Creative thoughts are often the fruits of extensive efforts. Several techniques are available to nurture those kinds of thoughts, especially in the decision making process. Some techniques focus on group interactions and others focus on individual actions. Many decisions are not made by individual managers but by groups of individuals. It is more appropriate for non-programmed decisions because these decisions are complex and no single individual has all the knowledge and skills necessary to make the best decisions. Groups can make decisions using a wide variety of techniques. Brainstorming is a group creativity technique by which a group tries to find a solution for a specific problem by gathering a list of ideas spontaneously contributed by its members. This paper divulges the prominence of brainstorming in the wake of group decision making in complex, comprehensive, competitive and corporate environment. Ke ywo rds Creative Thoughts, Free-Wheeling, Group Technique, Idea Generation, Problem Solving impossible to implement. In a subsequent session, the 1. Introduction alternatives are evaluated[7]. The origin of brainstorming came from Alex Faickney Osborn, who has been called “the father of brainstorming”, 2. Group Decision Making Technique in 1939 as a method for creative problem solving. He was frustrated by employees’ inability to develop creative ideas In brainstorming, teams of 5 to 10 members meet to gene individually for ad campaigns. In response, he began hosting rate ideas, usually following strict guidelines. The purpose group-thinking sessions and discovered a significant improv behind the brainstorming session is to have as many ideas ement in the quality and quantity of ideas produced by generated as possible and no idea is criticized no matter how employees. After organizing his discovery, Osborn then absurd it sounds. Any truly mad suggestions can beeliminat ed at the evaluation stage[8]. This encourages free-wheeling, published Applied Imagination in 1953 in which he systematized his creative problem-solving methods. This and one idea sometimes generates another[9]. book popularized the term brainstorming and received Brainstorming works best when it is organized and well significant response in the industry[1]. managed. At the Aloft Group Inc., a small advertising firm in Emily[2] pronounced that several popular and useful Newburyport, Mass., for example, President Matt Bowen techniques can stimulate individual and group creativity. teaches employees how to properly brainstorm as a way to Among them brainstorming is one approach. Brainstorming foster creative thinking[10]. His approach to brainstorming is a group technique, in which any and all ideas are recorded, is: specify the goal – ideally in a sentence and distribute it a in a nonjudgmental setting, for later critique andselection[3 day or two ahead of the session; limit the brainstorming ],[4]. It permits people to interact in a free and uninhibited session to an hour; keep the group small ideally 5-7 me mbers ; atmosphere[5]. It is most often used in the idea-generation allo w no critic isms there is no such thing as a “bad” idea; phase of decision making and is intended to solve problems encourage everyone to build on one another’s ideas; and, be sure to follow-up by implementing something from the that are new to the organization. In brainstorming, the group convenes specifically to generate alternatives. A number of brainstorming session[11]. alternatives have been generated[6]. Each alternative is recorded in full view of all members, usually on a flip chart. 3. Principles and General Rules To avoid self-censoring, no attempts to evaluate the ideas are Osborn claimed that two principles contribute to "ideative allo wed. Group members are encouraged to offer any ideas efficacy". They are: 1. Defer judgment, and 2. Reach for that occur to them, even those that seem too risky or quantity. These principles were followed by four general rules of brainstorming. The rules were established with * Corresponding author: intention to reduce social inhibitions among group members, [email protected] (Savanam Chandra Sekhar) Published online at http://journal.sapub.org/mm stimulate idea generation, and increase overall creativity of Copyright © 2012 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved the group. 114 Savanam Chandra Sekhar et al.: Brainstorming 3.1. Foc us on Quantity paid to all participants. In the Condition II, participants were This rule is a means of enhancing divergent production, awarded points for every unique idea of their own, and aiming to facilitate problem solving through the maxim subjects were paid for the points that they earned. In quantity breeds quality. The assumption is that the greater Condition III, subjects were paid based on the impact that the number of ideas generated, the greater the chance of their idea had on the group. This was measured by counting producing a radical and effective solution. the number of group ideas derived from the specific subject's ideas. Condition III outperformed Condition II, and Conditi 3.2. Withh ol d Criticism on II outperformed Condition I at a statistically significant level for most measures. The results demonstrated that In brainstorming, criticism of ideas generated should be participants were willing to work far longer to achieve put 'on hold'. Instead, participants should focus on extending unique results in the expectation of compensation. or adding to ideas, reserving criticism for a later 'critical stage' of the process. By suspending judgment, participants will feel free to generate unusual ideas. 6. Criticism 3.3. Welcome Unusual Ideas Research from Michael Diehl and Wolfgang Stroebe[12] To get a good and long list of ideas, unusual ideas are demonstrated that, given equal time, "real" groups, those that welcomed. They can be generated by looking from new brainstormed together, produced fewer ideas than "nominal" perspectives and suspending assumptions. These new ways groups, those wherein individuals provided ideas independe of thinking may provide better solutions. ntly of one another and only existed as a group in so far as their work was considered as a whole by researchers. Their 3.4. Combine and Improve Ideas conclusions were based on a review of 22 other studies, Good ideas may be combined to form a single better good 18 of which corroborated their findings. Further, brainstorm idea, as suggested by the slogan "1+1=3". It is believed to ing process is very time-consuming and it is quite possible stimulate the building of ideas by a process of association. that none of the ideas generated would be optimum[13]. 4. Brainstorming in Functional 7. Sources of Brainstorming Inadequacy Management Diehl and Stroebe identified three processes that derailed brainstorming efforts. These processes were free rid ing, Brainstorming is a passionate technique for all functi evaluation apprehension, and blocking. Other processes, onal areas of management to resolve critical problems. such as the social matching effect and the illusion of group Group ideas of different departments are certainly yardsticks productivity, can also undermine brainstorming efforts. for better improvement in production quality and quantity. Brainstorming makes easy the task of new product 7.1. Free Riding development as well as modifications for existing product. The new paths of meeting sales targets are examined through Individuals may feel that their ideas are less valuable line executive brainstorming sessions. Customer complaints when combined with the ideas of the group at large. are patronized properly in scheduled functional level 7.2. Evaluation Apprehension brainstorming sessions so that customer retention would be kept at best. It is not uncommon that when things become Evaluation Apprehension was determined to occur only in worse emergency like situations crop up and leads beyond instances of personal evaluation. If the assumption of collec control. Brainstorming provides alternative solutions to tive assessment were in place, real-time judgment of ideas, resolve emergency like situations which arouse out of ostensibly an induction of evaluation apprehension, failed to internal and/or external environmental factors. As if the induce significant variance. maxim says that two brains are better than one brain for thoughts, groups generate diverse ideas for a specific 7.3. Blocking problem and expedite alternative choices for decision Blocking describes the reality that only one person may making. As a whole, brainstorming is a powerful technique gainfully voice his or her ideas in a group at any given time. to make success of critical projects assigned at different levels of management. 7.4. Social Matc hing Effect The social matching effect is the tendency for individuals 5. Incentives and Brainstorming in a group to match the level of productivity by others in the group. When one group members feel that they are Olivier Toubia's research gave strong indications that contributing more to the brainstorming process than others, incentives can augment creative processes. Participants were they express a tendency to reduce their contributions to the divided into three conditions. In Condition I, a flat fee was group's