A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S Annual Report 2016 Esplanaden 50, DK-1098 Copenhagen K / Registration no. 22756214 WorldReginfo - 2ddd200e-0e54-4b3c-994c-99652d8e1adc A.P. Moller - Maersk — Annual Report 2016 CONTENTS DIRECTORS’ REPORT FINANCIALS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Highlights Consolidated financial Board of Directors 1 statements 2016 Guidance for 2017 Management Board 1 Parent company financial Five year summary statements 2016 Company overview 2 Strategy Statement of the Board of Directors Definition of terms Invested capital and ROIC and the Management Board Company announcements 2016 Financial review of the businesses Independent Auditor’s Report External financial reporting for A.P. Moller - Maersk1 Financial report PAGES 35-104 PAGES 105-115 Q4 2016 financials Risk management Corporate governance Shareholder information PAGES 3-34 The Annual Report for 2016 of A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S (further referred to as A.P. Moller - Maersk as the consolidated group of companies and A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S as the parent company) has been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adopted by the EU and further requirements in the Danish Financial Statements Act. Comparative figures Unless otherwise stated, all figures in parenthesis refer to the 1 Part of Directors’ Report corresponding figures for the previous year. 2 Part of Financials 2 / 115 WorldReginfo - 2ddd200e-0e54-4b3c-994c-99652d8e1adc A.P. Moller - Maersk — Annual Report 2016 Contents Directors’ report Highlights / Guidance for 2017 / Five year summary / Strategy / Invested capital and ROIC / Financial review of the businesses / Financial report / Q4 2016 financials Risk management / Corporate governance / Shareholder information / Board of Directors / Management Board / External financial reporting for A.P. Moller - Maersk 3 / 115 WorldReginfo - 2ddd200e-0e54-4b3c-994c-99652d8e1adc A.P. Moller - Maersk — Annual Report 2016 Contents The demand for transportation of goods grew below expecta­ A.P. Moller ­ Maersk recorded a loss of USD 1.9bn (profit of USD HIGHLIGHTS tions in the first half of the year, leading to a significant down­ 925m) and a ROIC of negative 2.7% (positive 2.9%) in 2016, ward pressure on freight rates. In the second half of the year negatively impacted by post­tax impairments of USD 2.8bn and especially in Q4, demand increased while deliveries of new (USD 2.6bn) and a significantly lower underlying result of USD A.P. Moller - Maersk delivered an unsatis- capacity were reduced, which led to a gradual improvement 711m (USD 3.1bn) severely impacted by price pressure and low factory loss of USD 1.9bn (profit of USD of freight rates. The difficult business environment during the market growth in all industries. 925m) negatively impacted by post-tax year enabled industry consolidation and a major container impairments of USD 2.8bn (USD 2.6bn) carrier went out of business, while Maersk Line continued its The underlying profit of USD 711m was within the guidance of be­ cost leadership strategy and gained significant market shares. low USD 1.0bn. Compared to last year, the reduction in the under­ primarily relating to Maersk Drilling of The consolidation in the container shipping industry as well as lying result was due to losses in Maersk Line and Maersk Supply USD 1.4bn (USD 27m) and Maersk Supply the challenging oil price environment had a negative impact on Service and with lower underlying results in APM Terminals, Service of USD 1.2bn (USD 0m). In line earnings in APM Terminals, who over the past years has been Maersk Tankers and Svitzer, while Maersk Oil, Maersk Drilling with the latest guidance provided in significantly expanding its terminal network, particularly in and Damco recorded increased under lying profits. November, the under lying profit came emerging and oil dependent economies. at USD 711m (USD 3.1bn). The return Revenue decreased to USD 35.5bn (USD 40.3bn) across all eight Oil prices reached their lowest level at the beginning of the year businesses, predominantly due to lower average container on invested capital (ROIC) was negative and have since then increased significantly, albeit from a very freight rates and lower oil price. Operating expenses decreased 2.7% (positive 2.9%). The free cash flow low level. Maersk Oil adjusted to market conditions by success­ by USD 2.6bn mainly due to lower bunker prices and focus on was negative USD 29m (positive USD fully accelerating cost reduction programmes beyond original cost efficiency across all businesses. 6.6bn including the sale of shares in targets, while at the same time improving production efficiency Danske Bank of USD 4.9bn). and progressing on major projects. A.P. Moller ­ Maersk’s cash flow from operating activities was USD 4.3bn (USD 8.0bn) impacted by the lower profit, higher net Despite significant cost optimisation initiatives, Maersk Drilling working capital and a one­off dispute settlement in Maersk Oil. and Maersk Supply Service were severely impacted by con­ Net cash flow used for capital expenditure was USD 4.4bn (USD tinued large scale cost reductions and project cancellations in 6.3bn excluding the sale of shares in Danske Bank of USD 4.9bn). the oil industry and the large inflow of new capacity over the Gross cash flow used for capital expenditure was USD 5.0bn, last years. Based on the challenging market conditions, signif­ USD 1.0bn lower than latest guidance, mainly due to timing of icant impairments were recognised in Maersk Drilling (USD payments in APM Terminals and Maersk Drilling. 1.5bn pre­tax or 18% of invested capital and a newbuilding con­ tract) and Maersk Supply Service (USD 1.2bn pre­tax or 44% of Net interest­bearing debt increased to USD 10.7bn (USD 7.8bn) invested capital and newbuilding contracts). Maersk Tankers mainly due to share buy­back of USD 475m, dividends of USD improved their commercial performance, contract coverage 1.0bn, new finance leases of USD 947m and net interest­bearing and cost savings, partly offsetting the negative impact from de­ debt of USD 0.4bn acquired through the Grup Marítim TCB clining rates. In line with the new strategy, all oil and oil related transaction partly offset by proceeds from sale of Danske Bank businesses initiated processes to prepare for separation from shares of USD 482m. A.P. Moller ­ Maersk. 4 / 115 WorldReginfo - 2ddd200e-0e54-4b3c-994c-99652d8e1adc A.P. Moller - Maersk — Annual Report 2016 Contents With an equity ratio of 52.5% (57.3%) and a liquidity reserve sition is subject to final agreement expected early in Q2 2017 Maersk Oil recorded a profit of USD 477m (loss of USD 2.1bn) of USD 11.8bn (USD 12.4bn), A.P. Moller ­ Maersk maintains its and to regulatory approvals expected end 2017. The transac­ with a positive ROIC of 11.4% (negative 38.6%) against an aver­ strong financial position. tion is expected to be completed by end 2017. age oil price of USD 44 per barrel in 2016 versus USD 52 per bar­ rel in 2015. The underlying profit was USD 497m (USD 435m), Maersk Line recorded a loss of USD 376m (profit of USD 1.3bn) APM Terminals reported a profit of USD 438m (USD 654m) positively impacted by operating cost reductions of 36%, ahead and a ROIC of negative 1.9% (positive 6.5%). The underlying and a ROIC of 5.7% (10.9%). The underlying profit was USD of the targeted 20% for the period 2014­2016, lower exploration result was a loss of USD 384m (profit of USD 1.3bn) due to poor 433m (USD 626m). Lower profit in commercially challenged costs, higher production efficiency and reduction of abandon­ market conditions leading to sustained lower freight rates terminals in Latin America, North­West Europe and Africa as ment provision of USD 93m. This was partly offset by the effect partly offset by higher volumes and lower unit costs related a consequence of liner network changes and weak underlying of the lower average oil price. to lower bunker price, higher utilisation and cost efficiencies. markets was only partly offset by cost saving initiatives. Maersk Drilling reported a loss of USD 694m (profit of USD Maersk Line reached an agreement on 1 December 2016 to Damco reported a profit of USD 31m (USD 19m) and a ROIC of 751m) negatively impacted by post­tax impairments of USD acquire Hamburg Süd, the German container shipping line. 14.6% (7.1%), while Svitzer recorded a profit of USD 91m (USD 1.4bn (USD 27m) giving a ROIC of negative 9.0% (positive 9.3%). Hamburg Süd is the world’s seventh largest container ship­ 120m) and a ROIC of 7.5% (10.9%). The underlying profit of USD 743m (USD 732m) was positively ping line and a leader in the North­South trades. The acqui­ impacted by termination fees of approximately USD 150m moved from 2017 to 2016, high operational uptime and savings on oper­ ating costs offset by ten rigs being idle or partly idle versus three rigs last year. The financial effect from the increased number of rigs without contract reduced the result in Q4 significantly. Underlying result reconciliation Maersk Supply Service reported a loss of USD 1.2bn (profit Profit/loss for the year Gain/loss on sale of non- Impairment losses, Tax on adjustments Underlying result – continuing operations current assets, etc., net1 net1 of USD 147m) and a ROIC of negative 76.7% (positive 8.5%) im­ USD million 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 pacted by impairments of USD 1.2bn (USD 0m), lower rates and Maersk Line -376 1,303 25 40 -17 -17 - -7 -384 1,287 utilisation as well as fewer vessel days available for trading APM Terminals 438 654 23 15 -10 14 -8 -1 433 626 due to divestments and lay­ups.