Why Aspire 3 Percentage average of defect leakage ratio that we promise to our customers 4 Fortune 500 customers that we have served and continue to serve in QA 30 Commercial and Open Source testing tools that we work on 100+ Highly skilled Test Automation programmers on Java, C#, Ruby, Python, Perl, Vbscript and others “Test” Drive Aspire with 200+ Exceptionally talented and certified QA resources Quantifiable and Measurable SLAs Achieve Quality, Cost Benefit and Reduced Defect Leakage 1300+ Products/Applications that we have tested till date 35000+ High severity bugs 100000+ Bugs identified till date Ready for Borland Rational SkillTest R Quick Test Professional software Aspire Systems Inc. Aspire Systems (India) Pvt. Ltd. Aspire Systems 1735 Technology Drive 1/D-1, SIPCOT IT PARK 1, Lyric Square Suite 260, San Jose Siruseri, Chennai - 603 103 Hammersmith CA - 95110 Tamil Nadu London - W6 0NB USA India UK Tel: +1-408-260-2076 Tel: +91-44-6740 4000 Tel: +44 203 170 6115 Fax: +1-408-904-4591 Fax: +91-44-6740 4234 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] SLA Centric QA Approach Innovative Engagement Models Type of SLAs Metrics How it works? Managed Testing Services Benefits: a) Complete 3rd party QA ownership b) SLA driven Defects identified in production / UAT would Defect leakage approach c) High cost savings <3% be less than 3% “Fits to the tee“ if: 1) Your focus is on software innovation, quality # of test Assured execution of 60 test cases per day & faster time-to-market 2) You are spending too much time in Productivity cases per resource managing software quality issues 80% of defects identified can be traced back Test case efficiency 80% to the test cases Outcome Based Benefits: a) Billing applicable only on achieving desired outcomes No resource and timeline variation from the b) Optimize resource usage and curtail additional spending during Effort/ schedule variance 0% Project Plan major/ minor releases “Fits to the tee“ if: 1) You want to work in risk/reward model 2) You Test cases designed based on requirements Test case design (first time prefer someone to assure quality with appropriate metrics 70% would be 70% right right) Defects identified through 80% of the defects identified would be from Testing-as-a-Service 80:20 adhoc vs. Structured structured testing and the rest from ad hoc Benefits: a) Manage specialized test efforts using teams for Cloud testing testing Testing, Data Warehouse Testing and Mobile Testing “Fits to the tee“ if: 1) You are looking for a flexible arrangement with * SLA terms are subjective in nature and based on Test Maturity levels. a 3rd party vendor 2) You do not have in-house skill sets for specific Calculate your Test Maturity level here testing requirements Achieved less than 1% defect leakage ratio for a Delivered 30% cost benefit with Managed Testing Fortune 500 Retail conglomerate Services for a leading ERM solutions provider Customer: A revolutionary player in developing the scheduling software product for Customer: US retail major with 840 department stores in 45 states the broadcast & media industries with the revenue of 24 billion Challenges: 1) Lack of dedicated QA team 2) 9% Defect leakage ratio Challenges: a) Lack of test coverage b) 75% of manual testing efforts Type of SLAs: Defect leakage - <3%, Test case efficiency - 80% Defect leakage - <3%, Test case design (first time right) – 75% Type of SLAs: Benefits: 1) Converted 100,000+ test cases into test scripts in less than 6 months Benefits: a) Effective Test Automation strategy b) Automated 120+ web services 2) Achieved near 100% test coverage 3) Reduced defect leakage ratio to 1.5% c) Helped in improving revenue generation by 10% 4) Increased productivity by 40% .