Leslie AD, Mencuccini M, Perks MP (2017). a Resource Capture

Leslie AD, Mencuccini M, Perks MP (2017). a Resource Capture

Research Article ii FF o o r r e e s s t t doi: 10.3832/ifor2248-010 Biogeosciences and Forestry vol. 10, pp. 397-405 A resource capture efficiency index to compare differences in early growth of four tree species in northern England Andrew D Leslie (1), At a trial established in Cumbria, northern England, significant differences in Maurizio Mencuccini (2), growth rate between tree species were apparent, with cider gum (Eucalyptus Mike P Perks (3) gunnii) and alder (Alnus glutinosa) exhibiting most rapid volume and biomass accumulation. Estimations were made of leaf area, specific leaf area, leaf area ratio (based on stem mass not whole tree mass) and length of growing season. These measurements were undertaken to explain tree growth difference and developing a growth potential index based on growing season length and leaf area. The high leaf area of cider gum and alder explained some of their supe- rior growth, while alder also had the longest period in leaf, compared with ash (Fraxinus excelsior) and sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus). The slow growth of ash can be explained by the short period in leaf and also the relatively low leaf area ratio. Leaf area to stem weight also differed between species with that of ash being relatively low. Specific leaf area was also low for ash, a trait shared with cider gum, which suggests that these species invest highly in each unit of leaf area. Of the tree species assessed, the length of the growing sea- son was longest for alder, enabling it to maintain growth for a longer period. By multiplying growing season by leaf area a resource capture index was calcu- lated and this explained 56% of the variation in stem dry weight between trees. The potential and limitations for using this index are discussed. Keywords: Eucalyptus gunnii, Fraxinus excelsior, Acer pseudoplatanus, Alnus glutinosa, Resource Capture Efficiency Introduction capture efficiency and resource use effi- for two or more years (Poorter et al. 2012). This paper compares the early growth at ciency (Stape et al. 2004). Resource cap- This higher LMF in evergreens may there- a trial in northern England of four broad- ture efficiency represents how efficiently a fore be largely because of the lifespan of leaved trees species identified as having tree is able to allocate its resources to har- the leaf rather than higher partitioning of potential for short rotation forestry (Hard- vesting light for photosynthesis. There are annual photosynthate to leaves (Poorter et castle 2006). Short rotation forestry for two components: leaf mass fraction (LMF) al. 2012). bioenergy was identified as a cost-effective and specific leaf area (SLA – Poorter et al. SLA reflects the amount of resources allo- and rapid means of reducing greenhouse 2012). LMF (the ratio of leaf dry mass to cated to each unit of leaf area and is the gases (Matthews & Broadmeadow 2009), total plant dry mass) reflects the priority of ratio of leaf area to leaf dry mass. SLA is yet there is very limited experience of such allocation of photosynthate to the leaves. generally higher in conifers, compared with systems in the UK. While quantifying yields Differences in LMF exist among tree spe- broadleaves and higher in fast growing from tree species in short rotation forestry cies, with higher LMF being an attribute of trees that those that are slow growing. A systems is crucial, understanding the un- faster growing trees (Poorter et al. 2012) meta-analysis undertaken by Poorter et al. derlying factors contributing to their pro- and also shade bearing trees (Valladares & (2009 in Poorter et al. 2012) found differ- ductivity is also important. Yield varies con- Niinemets 2008). LMF is higher in ever- ences in SLA between types of trees were siderably between tree species and on a green than deciduous trees but this is part- greater than for LMF. High SLA is a charac- specific site is dependent on their resource ly because evergreen trees retain leaves teristic of plants that have a high relative growth rate (RGR), small seed mass and both RGR and SLA were good predictors of (1) National School of Forestry, University of Cumbria, Ambleside Campus, Rydal Road, a plant’s potential invasiveness. Leaf area Ambleside, LA22 9BB (UK); (2) School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Crew Building, ratio (LAR) is a variable that combines LMF The King’s Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JN (UK); (3) Centre for Forestry and and SLA, being the ratio between leaf area Climate Change, Forest Research, Northern Research Station, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9SY and total tree weight and strongly influ- (UK) ences RGR, particularly on nutrient rich sites (Poorter & Remkes 1990). @ Andrew D Leslie ([email protected]) Growth of a tree is also influenced by the duration of its growing season. The length Received: Oct 12, 2016 - Accepted: Feb 01, 2017 of growing season has a strong influence on a tree’s productivity and differences Citation: Leslie AD, Mencuccini M, Perks MP (2017). A resource capture efficiency index to exist among species, origins and individual compare differences in early growth of four tree species in northern England. iForest 10: trees in terms of their period of dormancy. 397-405. – doi: 10.3832/ifor2248-010 [online 2017-03-24] The dormancy in pioneer trees is largely determined by temperature, rather than Communicated by: Silvano Fares photoperiod. In contrast, late successional trees follow a more conservative ap- © SISEF http://www.sisef.it/iforest/ 397 iForest 10: 397-405 Leslie AD et al. - iForest 10: 397-405 y r Hydrology 2013). Soil depth was not mea- t Tab. 1 - Origins of trees used in the trial and recommendations for the origins. A map s sured but was sufficiently deep to avoid li- e of regions of provenance (Zones) for Great Britain is available in Forestry Commission r mitations to early tree growth. (2016). Recommendations from: (1): Worrell (1992); (2): Hubert & Cundall (2006); (3): o The site use was previously improved pas- F J. Purse, pers. comm.; (4): Evans (1986); (5): Cope et al. (2008). ture, which was sprayed before planting d -1 n with Propazymide (3.75 litres ha ) to kill a Species Origin Recommendations the sward. The transplants were planted s Alder Zone 108, South west Scotland Use British provenances 1 e manually using a “T” notch and protected c Ash Zone 108, South west Scotland Seed stand material or material slightly to the n 2 in 60 cm tubes. Planting was at 2.5 m spac- e south of planting site i ing between rows and 1.5 m spacing within c Birch Zone 202, central to north Avoid origins from long distances away from s rows giving a stocking rate of 2667 stems o east Scotland the planting site (slightly southern/ eastern -1 2 ha . Routine spraying of weeds was under- e locations seems to give more rapid growth) g taken twice during each growing season o Cider Likely to be from a seed stand Origins from Lake McKenzie and Mount -1 i using glyphosate (5 litres ha ). The design gum at Dipton, New Zealand 3. Cattley, Tasmania perform particularly well 4-5 B adopted for the trial was a randomised – Original origin unknown. 4 complete block design, which is the most t Shining Likely to be from a seed stand Victoria provenances are most frost hardy s 3 commonly used design in forest experi- e gum at Dipton, New Zealand . r Origin Central Victoria ments (Wright & Andrew 1976) and large o F 10×8 tree plots were adopted. i Sycamore Zone 403, Midlands, England Most British provenances grow well at most sites. May increase productivity by using origins from sites slightly to the south of the Measurements and overview of analysis planting site 2 for each study Measurements taken in the studies are described in the four sections below. For proach, requiring a longer period of chilling tween the tree species explained by their the measurements two trees of each of the and are highly sensitive to photoperiod ecology. four species were selected randomly from (Basler & Korner 2012). Nutrition has also The hypotheses tested were that: (i) each of the six replicates in the trial. Shin- an influence on period of dormancy; tree there were differences in volume and bio- ing gum had died in its first winter and is species with enhanced access to nutrients, mass growth, SLA and LAR between the not included as part of this study. including nitrogen fixing trees like alder tree species at the trial; (ii) growth of stem adopt a higher risk approach to the devel- volume was positively related to leaf area Stem volume and biomass opment of their foliage, in a similar way to and growing season; (iii) the differences in Height and root collar diameter were pioneer trees (Tateno 2003). growth between individuals and species measured for the twelve trees of each At this trial, growth was measured but can be explained by their resource capture species in November 2010 (after two grow- also attributes important in influencing this efficiency and other aspects of their ecol- ing seasons) and November 2011 (after growth were quantified, and these were ogy. three growing seasons). Between Novem- compared between the tree species. A re- ber 2010 and 2011 all the cider gum had source capture efficiency index was de- Materials and methods died and so the later measurements were vised (leaf area × period in leaf) and its rela- not possible for this species. Height was tionship to stem volume was investigated. Experimental design measured using a height rod, while the Results are compared with those of other A one hectare trial was established at root collar diameter was measured to the researchers and differences observed be- Newton Rigg, Cumbria, England (55o 40′ nearest 0.1 mm using a digital vernier 56″ N, 02o 47′ 22″ W) at an elevation of 160 gauge and taking the mean of two mea- m above sea level.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    9 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us