Oceanographic Habitats of Two Sympatric North Pacific Albatrosses During the Breeding Season

Oceanographic Habitats of Two Sympatric North Pacific Albatrosses During the Breeding Season

MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 233: 283–301, 2002 Published May 21 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Oceanographic habitats of two sympatric North Pacific albatrosses during the breeding season K. David Hyrenbach1,*, Patricia Fernández2, David J. Anderson2 1Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92093-0208, USA 2Department of Biology, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27109-7325, USA ABSTRACT: We characterized the movements and oceanographic habitats of black-footed (Phoebas- tria nigripes) and Laysan (P. immutabilis) albatrosses during the brooding and the rearing periods of the breeding cycle. Analyses of satellite telemetry data in conjunction with remotely sensed sea sur- face temperature and chlorophyll concentrations revealed substantial differences in habitat use between these 2 sympatrically breeding species. During the brooding period, black-footed albatross restricted their foraging to tropical waters (>20°C), while Laysan albatross ventured into the colder waters of the Transition Domain (15 to 12°C) and the Subarctic Frontal Zone (12 to 10°C). This pelagic segregation became more apparent with the expansion of the foraging ranges later in the breeding season. During the chick-rearing period, black-footed albatross commuted to the California Current (15 to 12°C) and Laysan albatross foraged in subarctic (<12°C) and Transition Domain (15 to 12°C) waters. The foraging behavior of albatrosses was scale-dependent. Over macro-mega scales of (1000 to 3000 km) albatross dispersion was influenced by large-scale ocean productivity patterns and water mass distributions. Over smaller coarse-meso scales of (10 to 100 km) albatrosses focused their forag- ing activities along oceanic habitats characterized by elevated ocean productivity and prey aggrega- tion. The foraging birds traveled more slowly in the vicinity of highly productive continental shelves (central California to Washington State, Aleutian Islands), and hydrographic fronts (Transition Domain, North Pacific Transition Zone Chlorophyll Front). Conversely, the satellite tracked alba- trosses commuted rapidly over tropical and subtropical waters between these foraging areas and the breeding colony. These results highlight the significance of macro-mega scale of (1000 to 3000 km) water mass distributions and coarse-meso scale (10 to 100 km) hydrographic features to far-ranging marine predators, and underscore the need to understand how physical-biological processes sustain predictable regions of elevated ocean productivity and prey aggregation in marine systems. KEY WORDS: Area restricted searching · Frontal systems · Habitat use · Kernel analysis · Phoebastria immutabilis · Phoebastria nigripes · Satellite telemetry · Spatial segregation Resale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisher INTRODUCTION (1000 to 3000 km) current systems and oceanographic domains, and by coarse-meso scale (10 to 100 km) pro- Marine productivity is not distributed uniformly cesses that promote water-column mixing and across ocean basins. Instead, chlorophyll concentra- convergence (Aron 1962, Haury et al. 1978, Hunt & tion, zooplankton biomass, nekton abundance, and Schneider 1987, Longhurst 1998). Because pelagic sys- seabird numbers are influenced by macro-mega scale tems are heterogeneous in space and time, it has gen- erally been assumed that oceanic seabirds use prey *Present address: Duke University Marine Laboratory, 135 patches that are scarce and unpredictable (Lack 1968, Duke Marine Lab Road, Beaufort, North Carolina 28516, USA. Jouventin & Weimerskirch 1990, Weimerskirch et al. E-mail: [email protected] 1994b). Low prey availability and large distances be- © Inter-Research 2002 · www.int-res.com 284 Mar Ecol Prog Ser 233: 283–301, 2002 tween food patches have been invoked to explain the to 53° N for the black-footed albatross and 8° to 59° N vast foraging ranges and the morphological (e.g. low for the Laysan albatross), and from the west coast of wing loading, high wing aspect ratios), physiological North America (120° W) to Japan (140° E) (Shuntov (e.g. energy storage as stomach oil, low metabolic 1974, Whittow 1993a, b). rates), and behavioral (e.g. dynamic soaring, alterna- Black-footed and Laysan albatrosses inhabit a vast tion of long and short foraging trips) characteristics and heterogeneous environment. Over macro-mega that allow breeding seabirds to provision concentrated scales (1000 to 3000 km) phytoplankton, zooplankton, energy to the nest (Warham et al. 1976, Warham 1977, and nekton standing stocks increase across the North Pennycuick 1987, Jouventin & Weimerskirch 1990, Pacific from subtropical regions to subarctic waters, Weimerskirch et al. 1994a, 2000, Nicholls et al. 1997). indicating strong latitudinal gradients in ocean pro- Albatrosses are a prime example of marine birds suited ductivity (Aron 1962, Vinogradov et al. 1997, Long- for a pelagic existence (Warham 1990). hurst 1998). Superimposed on this latitudinal ecotone, Broadscale (100 to 1000 km) vessel-based surveys another productivity gradient extends from the center have revealed that albatrosses inhabit ocean regions of the Subtropical Gyre (approximately 30° N) toward within specific ranges of temperature and salinity the highly productive waters along the periphery of termed water masses, and often aggregate at hydro- the North Pacific (Barber & Smith 1981, Vinogradov graphic and bathymetric gradients such as frontal sys- 1981, Longhurst 1998). Over smaller coarse-meso scales tems, and continental shelves and slopes (Stahl et al. (10 to 100 km), a variety of physical and biological pro- 1985, Wahl et al. 1989, Veit & Hunt 1992). These ob- cesses influence localized production and prey disper- servations, however, have been constrained by the sion across the North Pacific. Bathymetric features tendency of albatrosses to follow survey vessels, and (e.g. shelf breaks, seamounts) and water mass bound- by the inability of observers to determine the origin, aries (e.g. eddies, fronts) enhance water-column mix- gender, and reproductive status of birds sighted at sea ing, stimulate localized production, and aggregate (Prince et al. 1999, Hyrenbach 2001). planktonic prey at secondary convergence zones (Wo- In recent years, technological developments have lanski & Hamner 1988, Franks 1992, Larson et al. 1994, advanced our understanding of the foraging ecology Springer et al. 1996, Polovina et al. 2001). and the habitats of pelagic seabirds. In particular, the The objective of this research was to determine how advent of satellite telemetry in the early 1990s facili- oceanographic variability influences the dispersion and tated the study of the movements and the foraging the foraging behavior of 2 sympatrically breeding far- ranges of individually known birds. Pioneering re- ranging seabirds. More specifically, this study con- search in the Southern Ocean revealed that wandering trasts the habitats used by black-footed and Laysan albatross Diomedea exulans routinely traveled O(1000 albatrosses during the brooding and the chick-rearing km) between successive provisioning visits to their periods of the breeding season. These analyses address chicks, and repeatedly commuted to specific oceanic the significance of large-scale O(1000 km) water mass sectors (Jouventin & Weimerskirch 1990). Subsequent distributions and small-scale (10 to 100 km) areas of telemetry studies have documented gender-based high productivity and prey aggregation. The 3 basic differences in albatross reproductive strategies (e.g. questions underlying this research are: (1) whether resource allocation to chicks) and dispersion (e.g. for- North Pacific albatrosses forage in predictable oceanic aging range and trip duration), as well as distinct habitats characterized by specific water depth, ocean species-specific habitat use patterns (Prince et al. 1992, temperature, and chlorophyll concentrations; (2) do 1999, Veit & Prince 1997, Weimerskirch et al. 1997, foraging albatrosses segregate at sea by gender and by Waugh et al. 1999, Fernández et al. 2001). Moreover, species; and (3) does habitat use change during the satellite telemetry studies have highlighted the signifi- breeding season. This study complements a previous cance of specific oceanic habitats such as frontal areas description of North Pacific albatross foraging destina- (Rodhouse et al. 1996, Prince et al. 1999), continental tions by Fernández et al. (2001). shelves (Anderson et al. 1998, Gremillet et al. 2000, Fernández et al. 2001), and shallow banks (Cherel & Weimerskirch 1995, Weimerskirch et al. 1997) as for- MATERIALS AND METHODS aging grounds for breeding albatrosses. This research focused on the 2 most numerous North Study site. We studied the movements, foraging des- Pacific albatross species: the black-footed (Phoebastria tinations, and oceanic habitats of 2 subtropical Hawai- nigripes) and the Laysan (P. immutabilis) albatrosses. ian albatross species nesting at Tern Island (23.878° N, These species breed sympatrically on islands along the 166.288° W), French Frigate Shoals, Hawaii during the Hawaiian Chain and have broad distributions span- 1998 breeding season (January to July). Tern Island ning tropical, subtropical, and subarctic latitudes (15° lies in the middle of the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre: Hyrenbach et al.: Oceanographic habitats of sympatric North Pacific albatrosses 285 3200 km from the Aleutian Chain (AC), 4500 km from nals (PTTs), ground-truth

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    19 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us