Heliox Administration in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: an Evidence-Based Review

Heliox Administration in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: an Evidence-Based Review

Review Article Heliox administration in the pediatric intensive care unit: An evidence-based review Vineet K. Gupta, MD; Ira M. Cheifetz, MD, FCCM Objective: To provide a comprehensive, evidence-based review Conclusions: Heliox administration is most effective during of helium–oxygen gas mixtures (heliox) in the management of conditions involving density-dependent increases in airway resis- pediatric respiratory diseases. tance, especially when used early in an acute disease process. Data Source: A thorough, computerized bibliographic search of Any beneficial effect of heliox should become evident in a rela- the preclinical and clinical literature regarding the properties of tively short period of time. The medical literature supports the use helium and its application in pediatric respiratory disease states. of heliox to relieve respiratory distress, decrease the work of Data Synthesis: After an overview of the potential benefits and breathing, and improve gas exchange. No adverse effects of technical aspects of helium–oxygen gas mixtures, the role of heliox have been reported. However, heliox must be administered heliox is addressed for asthma, aerosolized medication delivery, with vigilance and continuous monitoring to avoid technical com- upper airway obstruction, postextubation stridor, croup, bronchi- plications. (Pediatr Crit Care Med 2005; 6:204–211) olitis, and high-frequency ventilation. The available data are ob- KEY WORDS: helium; mechanical ventilation; acute lung injury; jectively classified based on the value of the therapy or interven- gas exchange; pediatrics; carbon dioxide; heliox; respiration; tion as determined by the study design from which the data are asthma; airway obstruction; bronchiolitis; croup; extubation; obtained. acute lung injury; respiratory distress; respiratory failure elium as a medical therapy To objectively assess the value of each of Figure 1 demonstrates the differences was first described in 1934 the studies, a classification system is used in relative density between heliox and ox- by Barach (1) for the treat- based on the study type and the rigors of ygen-enriched air at various concentra- ment of asthma and upper the study design. This approach, as detailed tions of oxygen. There is an insignificant Hairway obstruction. Subsequently, heliu- in Table 1, is modeled after the classifica- difference in relative gas density at vari- m–oxygen mixtures (heliox) have been tion system used in the construction of the ous oxygen concentrations with nitrogen demonstrated to improve gas exchange in Guidelines for the Acute Medical Manage- as the balance gas. However, with helium patients with asthma, bronchiolitis, up- ment of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in as the balance gas, there is a wide vari- per airway obstruction, cystic fibrosis, Infants, Children, and Adolescents (13). In ability in relative density between various chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, each section, data are presented in the or- oxygen concentrations. By its lower den- and, most recently, acute lung injury (2– der of the study classification with the most sity, heliox improves gas flow through 12). With the increased use of helium for reliable studies listed first. It should be high-resistance airways. the treatment of respiratory conditions, it noted that all heliox studies in the litera- Gas flow can vary from laminar at one is imperative for the clinician to under- ture are limited by small sample sizes. end of the spectrum to turbulent at the stand the mechanisms of action and sce- other. Laminar flow rate (Q) is deter- narios in which heliox therapy is and is HELIOX: AN OVERVIEW mined by the Hagen-Poiseuille equation: not warranted. By reviewing the litera- Helium is a colorless, odorless gas, ture over the last 70 yrs, it is our hope ϭ ⌬ ␲ 4 ␩ which was first discovered during a solar Q P r /8 l[1] that this evidence-based medicine review eclipse in 1868. Helium is an inert gas will shed light on the clinical applications with no direct pharmacologic or biologic where ⌬P is the pressure drop, r is the of helium. effects. It has no intrinsic bronchodila- radius, ␩ is the gas viscosity, and l is the tory or anti-inflammatory properties. The length. Because the viscosity of the gases variable that makes helium so attractive are similar (Table 2) and laminar flow From the Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medi- velocity is independent of density, heliox cine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC. for medical use lies in the differences The authors have no financial interest to disclose. between the density of helium vs. other has no effect on areas of laminar flow. Address requests for reprints to: Vineet Kumar Gupta, gases. The density of helium is one- As flow velocity decreases and/or airway MD, Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Mercy seventh that of air (Table 2). Helium has resistance increases, there is a critical level Children’s Hospital, 2213 Cherry Street, 6th Floor, Toledo, in which the flow pattern changes from OH 43608. E-mail: [email protected]. the lowest density of any gas except hy- Copyright © 2005 by the Society of Critical Care drogen and, unlike hydrogen, is nonflam- turbulent to laminar. This transitional zone Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Inten- mable. Equally important, carbon dioxide is defined by Reynolds number (Re): sive and Critical Care Societies diffuses through helium four to five times DOI: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000154946.62733.94 faster than through air (5, 12, 14, 15). Re ϭ 2Vr␳/␩ [2] 204 Pediatr Crit Care Med 2005 Vol. 6, No. 2 Table 1. Classification system vary. However, gas density and thermal conductivity significantly differ at varying ● Class I evidence represents randomized, controlled trials–the “gold standard” of clinical trials. oxygen concentrations with heliox. Thus, However, some may be poorly designed, lack sufficient patient numbers, or suffer from other helium, with its lower gas density and methodologic inadequacies. ● Class II evidence represents nonrandomized clinical studies in which the data were collected increased heat-carrying capability, re- prospectively and retrospective studies, which were based on clearly reliable data. Types of sults in imprecise pressure and tempera- studies so classified include observational studies, cohort studies, prevalence studies, and case- ture changes, and, subsequently, false control studies. tidal volume measurements. Therefore, ● Class III evidence represents most retrospective studies. Evidence used in this class indicates in-line respiratory mechanic monitors clinical series, databases, registries, case reviews, case reports, and expert opinion. and/or ventilators with heliox calibration capabilities are needed to accurately de- termine delivered tidal volume with he- Table 2. Densities liox (20–22). Alternatively, mathematic ␩ Viscosity ( ) Density CO2 Diffusion Coefficient Thermal Conductivity correction factors are required. Gas (micropoises) (␳) (g/L) (cm2/sec) (␮cal ⅐ cm ⅐ sec ⅐ °K) Tanks of 100% helium are available and require a blender to dilute the he- Nitrogen 167.4 1.251 0.165 58 lium to provide a source of oxygen to the Oxygen 192.6 1.429 0.139 58.5 patient. An interruption in oxygen deliv- Air 170.8 1.293 0.138 58 Helium 188.7 0.179 — 352 ery could possibly result in the accidental Heliox (80:20) — 0.43 0.56 — administration of a hypoxic gas mixture, including the possibility of delivering 100% helium (21). Premixed heliox tanks with at least a 20% oxygen concentration avoids this potentially fatal complication. Continuous in-line monitoring of in- spired oxygen concentration to ensure adequate oxygen delivery to the airways is warranted. It is essential to humidify and warm the delivered heliox gas to prevent signif- icant heat loss, especially in the pediatric patient. The thermal conductivity of he- lium is approximately four to six times that of nitrogen (Table 2). It is also es- sential to ensure that there is no acciden- tal contamination of the heliox mixture with air or oxygen. As discussed, any ac- Figure 1. The differences in relative density between heliox and oxygen-enriched air at various cidental introduction of other gases will concentrations of oxygen. lower the helium concentration in the total gas mixture, thus increasing the density of the delivered gas. where ␳ is the gas density and V is gas gas flow allowing for increased bulk flow, Any pressure exerted on the lungs velocity. A Reynolds number Ͻ2,000 pre- increased oxygen flow, and decreased through an endotracheal tube inevitably dicts laminar flow and Ͼ4,000 predicts work of breathing (17, 18). results in some degree of lung injury turbulent flow. Thus, helium with its (24–30). Because the major determinants lower density will decrease Reynolds HELIOX AND MECHANICAL of ventilator-induced lung injury are air- number in those airways operating in the VENTILATOR FUNCTION way pressure and lung distension, heliox transitional zone of flow patterns and will as the balance gas may allow for similar change turbulent flow into a more lami- The administration of heliox during gas exchange at lower airway pressures. If nar flow type with improved diffusion mechanical ventilation must occur with this is correct, then, theoretically, heliox characteristics. vigilance and continuous monitoring be- administration may decrease the risk of When evaluating extremely turbulent cause helium can interfere with the ac- iatrogenic lung injury. flow patterns, flow rate becomes depen- curacy of pneumotachometers and venti- dent on gas density according

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    8 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us