Representative Diatom and Coccolithophore Species Exhibit Divergent Responses Throughout Simulated Upwelling Cycles

Representative Diatom and Coccolithophore Species Exhibit Divergent Responses Throughout Simulated Upwelling Cycles

bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.30.071480; this version posted February 20, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. Representative diatom and coccolithophore species exhibit divergent responses throughout simulated upwelling cycles Robert H. Lampe1,2, Gustavo Hernandez2, Yuan Yu Lin2, and Adrian Marchetti2, 1Integrative Oceanography Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA 2Department of Marine Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA Wind-driven upwelling followed by relaxation results in cy- welling portion of the UCBC is referred to as the shift-up cles of cold nutrient-rich water fueling intense phytoplankton response and includes an acceleration of processes such as blooms followed by nutrient-depletion, bloom decline, and sink- nitrate uptake, assimilation, and growth (2, 5). Diatoms ing of cells. Surviving cells at depth can then be vertically trans- are believed to be particularly suited for shift-up leading ported back to the surface with upwelled waters to seed an- to their dominance of phytoplankton blooms following up- other bloom. As a result of these cycles, phytoplankton com- welling (4, 6, 7). When upwelling delivers cells and nutrients munities in upwelling regions are transported through a wide into well-lit surface waters, diatoms quickly respond to avail- range of light and nutrient conditions. Diatoms appear to be well-suited for these cycles, but their responses to them re- able nitrate and increase their nitrate uptake rates compared main understudied. To investigate the bases for diatoms’ eco- to other phytoplankton groups allowing them to bloom (8). logical success in upwelling environments, we employed labora- This phenomenon may partially be explained by frontloading tory simulations of a complete upwelling cycle with a common nitrate assimilation genes, or maintaining high gene expres- diatom, Chaetoceros decipiens, and coccolithophore, Emiliania sion leading up to an upwelling event such that nitrate assimi- huxleyi. We show that while both organisms exhibited physio- lation transcripts are already abundant once upwelling condi- logical and transcriptomic plasticity, the diatom displayed a dis- tions return (7). In addition, diatoms uniquely integrate their tinct response enabling it to rapidly shift-up growth rates and nitrogen and carbon metabolic pathways enabling a rapid re- nitrate assimilation when returned to light and available nutri- sponse (9). ents following dark, nutrient-deplete conditions. As observed in Coupled to rapid nitrate uptake rates, phytoplankton in natural diatom communities, C. decipiens highly expresses be- fore upwelling, or frontloads, key transcriptional and nitrate natural communities have been observed to dramatically al- assimilation genes coordinating its rapid response to upwelling ter their carbon-to-nitrogen (C:N) ratios (7, 8, 10). C:N ra- conditions. Low iron simulations showed that C. decipiens is tios well above the predicted Redfield value (6.6:1) imply capable of maintaining this response when iron is limiting to that cells faced nitrogen limitation as the upwelled waters growth, whereas E. huxleyi is not. Differential expression be- aged and then sank to depth, but this alteration has yet to tween iron treatments further revealed specific genes used by be shown in the context of a complete UCBC cycle and with- each organism under low iron availability. Overall, these results out the influence of other non-phytoplankton detrital material highlight the responses of two dominant phytoplankton groups that would affect these measurements (7, 8, 10). Ultimately, to upwelling cycles, providing insight into the mechanisms fuel- such shifts in cellular elemental quotas associated with sink- ing diatom blooms during upwelling events. ing cells can decouple the biogeochemical cycling of these Correspondence: [email protected] elements. The responses of phytoplankton within the UCBC are also influenced by the availability of the micronutrient iron. Introduction In the California and Peru/Humboldt Upwelling Zones for Phytoplankton communities in coastal upwelling regions dis- example, iron delivery is primarily dependent on riverine in- proportionately contribute to global primary production and put and upwelling-driven resuspension of continental shelf serve as the base of highly productive food webs (1). In- sediments (11–15). In areas with steep continental shelves, termittent upwelling of cold, nutrient-rich water from depth reduced interaction between upwelled waters and sediment fuels this productivity with blooms that eventually deplete es- results in decreased iron relative to macronutrients and iron sential inorganic nutrients and sink to depth as upwelling sub- limitation as the phytoplankton bloom develops. As up- sides. As a result of upwelling and relaxation, phytoplankton welling is anticipated to intensify from climate change, in- undergo a cycle in which subsurface populations are verti- creased upwelled nitrate has the potential to be further un- cally transported with upwelled water masses to seed surface matched by upwelled iron causing an expansion of iron lim- blooms and return to depth as upwelling subsides and nutri- itation regions (1, 16). Furthermore, ocean acidification may ents are depleted (2–4). Herein this loop is referred to as the cause reduced iron bioavailability to phytoplankton (17, 18). upwelling conveyer belt cycle (UCBC; Fig. 1A). An understanding of phytoplankton responses to the The physiological response of phytoplankton to the up- UCBC remains limited and is primarily based on a relatively Lampe et al. | bioRχiv | February 20, 2021 | 1–14 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.30.071480; this version posted February 20, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. A simulated sinking out of the euphotic zone. Following this dark period, a portion of the culture was transferred to fresh High Light, Low Nutrients Balanced Growth High Light, High Nutrients (Shift-Down; T6) (T1, T5) (Shift-up; T4) medium and returned to light to simulate upwelling until sta- tionary growth was again observed. The simulations included subsampling that was performed immediately before and 12 Sinking hours after the upwelling portion of the UCBC to evaluate the ability of cells to exhibit a shift-up response. Low iron Low Light, High Nutrients Upwelling (T2, T3) simulations were included to evaluate responses under iron- limitation. In order to compare two phytoplankton lineages com- monly present in upwelled waters, a representative diatom, Chaetoceros decipiens, and coccolithophore, Emiliania hux- leyi, were used. Both isolates were recently obtained from B the California Upwelling Zone. The genus Chaetoceros is 115 μmol photons m -2 s -1 , 12°C 0 μmol photons m -2 s -1 , 12°C considered the most abundant and diverse diatom genus and Clean air Move to dark T2 is highly prevalent in the California coastal waters (19, 20). T1, T5 Stationary Phase T6 (2 days) 1 day 1 day E. huxleyi is a globally distributed dominant bloom-forming coccolithophore and found to be one of the most abundant coccolithophores within a coastal California time series (21– Exponential 9 days Growth 23). Together, this comparison highlights changes in phyto- Add media Move to light T4 T3 plankton C:N ratios which influence biogeochemical cycling 12 hours of these elements and examines unique physiological and molecular responses that provide insight into phytoplankton blooms in upwelling regions. C T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 100 Results and Discussion Physiological and transcriptomic responses through- 10 U out the UCBC. C. decipiens and E. huxleyi displayed clear F R physiological responses to the different UCBC conditions un- 1 der iron-replete conditions (Fig. 2; black bars). Both reduced chlorophyll a under stationary growth phases (T2 and T3; 0.1 Figs. 2A, 2B, and S1). Photosynthetic efficiency (Fv:Fm) 0 2 4 6 8 0 2 4 6 8 0 2 4 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 was also lower at the stationary phase time points (T2 and days T3) compared to the initial exponential growth time point (T1)(Figs. 2C and 2D). In C. decipiens, these declines were Fig. 1. (A) Conceptual overview of the upwelling conveyer belt cycle (UCBC) repro- significant (P < 0.001, Dataset S1). Following the dark pe- duced from Wilkerson and Dugdale (5) and annotated with experimental time points riod, both species increased photosynthetic efficiency when that most closely represent different UCBC stages. Importantly, nutrients were not supplied at T2 and T3 resulting in a low light, low nutrient scenario. (B) Schematic the cells returned to exponential growth which is consistent of the experimental design to closely mimic different UCBC stages. (C) Growth with previous field observations (7). curves in raw fluorescence units (RFUs) for C. decipiens in the high iron treatment Cellular C:N ratios for both species also fluctuated throughout the UCBC simulation. The 10-day dark period is denoted with a grey background. Sampling time points are annotated with dotted lines. Data for the throughout the cycle (Figs.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    14 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us