Clinical Practice Committee Publication HORMONE Horm Res Paediatr 2010;73:2–5 Received: March 11, 2009 RESEARCH IN DOI: 10.1159/000271910 Accepted: March 20, 2009 PÆDIATRIC S Published online: January 15, 2010 Bone Age Assessment in the Workup of Children with Endocrine Disorders Gian Luigi Spadoni Stefano Cianfarani ‘Rina Balducci’ Center of Paediatric Endocrinology, Department of Public Health and Cell Biology, Tor Vergata University, Rome , Italy Key Words Introduction Bone age ؒ Growth ؒ Short stature ؒ Puberty ؒ Adult height prediction In most children growth, puberty and related endo- crine changes follow a well-orchestrated pattern but the pace of maturation varies widely so that these events Abstract should be related to physical maturity rather than chron- Bone age is a measure of developmental age, or physiologi- ological age. Skeletal maturation is a surrogate of devel- cal maturity, which represents more truthfully than chrono- opmental age, or physiological maturity, which repre- logical age, how far an individual has progressed towards sents more truthfully than chronological age, how far an full maturity. It is particularly helpful in the clinical workup of individual has progressed towards full maturity and may children with growth and/or puberty disorders as well as in hence be considered a sort of ‘biological age’. treating decisions, such as whether to start replacement Skeletal maturation is marked by an orderly and re- therapy in a patient with hypogonadism. Skeletal maturity producible sequence of recognizable changes in the ap- assessment plays a pivotal role in confirming the diagnosis pearance of the skeleton during childhood. Such changes of normal variants of growth such as familial short stature include the timing and sequence of the appearance of the and constitutional delay of growth, in interpreting hormone centers of ossification, specific alterations in the contours tests during puberty, and in the diagnosis of precocious pu- of the bones, and the timing and sequence of the ultimate berty and hyperandrogenism. On the other hand, it is impor- closure of the growth plates. Radiographically, skeletal tant to recognize that overemphasizing bone age evaluation maturity can be assessed by comparing the radiographic can be misleading if not used in the proper settings. Adult appearance of portions of an individual child’s skeleton height prediction is based on skeletal maturity assessment with the standardized appearance in a comparable popu- and can be used to predict with acceptable accuracy which lation of children at various stages in their progress to- adult height will be achieved by a ‘normal’ child. However, ward maturity. Radiographic assessment of skeletal ma- the predictions do not apply to children with endocrine or turity in the child is most frequently based on the appear- bone pathologies affecting growth. ance of the hand and wrist. Copyright © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel Bone age assessment is particularly useful in the clin- ical evaluation of early and late maturers. Although bone © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel Stefano Cianfarani, MD 1663–2818/10/0731–0002$26.00/0 ‘Rina Balducci’ Center of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Public Health and Fax +41 61 306 12 34 Cell Biology , Room E-178, Tor Vergata University, Via Montpellier 1 E-Mail [email protected] Accessible online at: IT–00133 Rome (Italy) www.karger.com www.karger.com/hrp Tel. +39 06 7259 6178, Fax +39 06 591 7415, E-Mail [email protected] Table 1. Indications and limitations of bone age assessment With the TW2 method each bone is matched with a set of 8 standard ages and its stage is rated. Each stage of Bone age is necessary each bone has a score attached to it, which is derived In the diagnosis of FSS and CDGP For interpreting hormone levels at pubertal age mathematically so that the sum of the scores for all the For diagnosis of precocious puberty or hyperandrogenism bones represents the best overall estimate of skeletal ma- For deciding whether or not to treat the above-mentioned turity. The Tanner-Whitehouse standards are based on a conditions large-scale random sample of urban and rural children For predicting adult height in normal children taken in the 1950s. Scoring bone by bone makes the TW2 Bone age is useful In evaluating any child with growth and/or puberty disorders method potentially more accurate than the Greulich-Pyle In deciding when to start replacement therapy in atlas method. However, the TW2 method is consistently hypogonadism time consuming and based on a combined score; assign- In monitoring children on GH therapy ing to each of the 20 bones a single score chosen among Bone age may be misleading 8 or 9 maturity stages may eventually lead to a higher risk In evaluating children with bone disorders In predicting adult height in pathological conditions of error than the comprehensive analysis method of If considered an absolute diagnostic marker Greulich-Pyle. An automatic measurement of bone age If, during the follow-up of a patient or in comparing groups using computerized image analysis based on TW2 was of patients, different readers are involved or different proposed to facilitate and speed up the reading [6] . methods are employed A d u l t H e i g h t P r e d i c t i o n age assessment may provide precious information, it In normal children, bone age closely correlates with should always be considered ancillary to a more compre- the remaining growth potential and it has been included hensive clinical, auxological and laboratory approach ( ta- in the equations used for predicting adult height. Each ble 1 ). bone age assessment method refers to its specific adult height prediction method: namely the Bayley-Pinneau method for the Greulich-Pyle method of bone age assess- Methods of Bone Age Assessment ment and the TW2 height prediction method for the TW2 bone age method. The predictions, however, do not apply In principle, any part of the skeleton could be used to to children with endocrine or bone pathologies affecting determine skeletal maturity, but in practice the hand and growth and should be restricted to normal children be- wrist represent the most convenient area. They are easily cause a delay in bone age does not necessarily mean a big- X-rayed without fear of any radiation being delivered to ger growth potential. the reproductive organs. The two most widely used methods are the ‘atlas’ method of Greulich-Pyle [1–3] and the bone scoring Conditions in Which Bone Age Assessment Is method of Tanner-Whitehouse (TW2 method) [4, 5] . Necessary They are not always comparable and cannot be consid- ered interchangeable. Therefore, in the follow-up of an Normal Variants of Growth: Familial Short Stature individual or in comparing different groups of patients it and Constitutional Delay of Growth and Puberty is crucial to use the same method. The vast majority of short children referred to the pe- With the Greulich-Pyle atlas method, developed from diatric endocrinologist do not have any pathological con- films taken in the 1930s and 1940s, each bone is matched ditions but their patterns of growth represent normal with a similar-appearing bone in a series of standard ra- variants of the growth process. Classically, normal vari- diographs of bones of increasing age. This is still the most ants of growth comprise familial short stature (FSS) and frequently used method; certainly its easy use and the constitutional delay of growth and puberty (CDGP). To fact that moving quickly from the preceding to the fol- be identified both conditions require the ascertainment lowing standard makes it difficult, at least for the experi- of a normal growth rate. FSS children present a stature enced reader, to have an error greater than the time inter- within the target height range and no bone age delay, val which separates two X-ray standards. whilst CDGP subjects show short stature, bone age delay Bone Age Evaluation Horm Res Paediatr 2010;73:2–5 3 (usually more than 2 years), delayed onset of puberty, and risk of subnormal adult height and deserve specific treat- often familial history of delayed puberty. ment, a subset of children will have a good spontaneous height outcome. The degree of bone age advancement and Interpretation of Endocrine Tests during Puberty the actual height of the child play a key role in selecting Bone age is extremely helpful in the interpretation of children to be treated with either GnRH analogs (preco- the GnRH test carried out to distinguish delayed puberty cious puberty) or hydrocortisone (CAH). Once therapy is from hypogonadism. Subnormal peak gondotropin re- started, skeletal maturation assessment will be helpful to sponses to GnRH test indicate a gonadotropin defect only monitor the effect of therapy on the advancement of bone if the child has a biological age consistent with the physi- age and, ultimately, on the adult height prognosis. ological rise in gonadotropins. In practice a bone age of 13 years may be considered the threshold to expect the Adult Height Prediction (Projection) in Normal pubertal gonadotropin response. Therefore, we should Children not expect pubertal values of LH and FSH in a child with Bone age is essential for predicting adult height ac- a bone age less than 13 years. cording to both Bayley-Pinneau and TW2 methods. Pro- jected height represents a method to roughly predict adult Precocious Puberty and Hyperandrogenism height. It consists of plotting actual height on centile In case of anticipated or premature appearance of the curves according to the bone age rather than the chrono- secondary sex characteristics, bone age should be used in logical age. the differential diagnosis. It often occurs that a girl ex- hibits the symmetrical or asymmetrical growth of mam- mary glands before the age of 8 years.