Land Use Impacts Technical Report

Land Use Impacts Technical Report

Land Use Impacts Technical Report August 2014 Prepared by Land Use Impacts Technical Report August 2014 Prepared by: The San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Land Use Impacts Technical Report Table of Contents Table of Contents PREFACE ............................................................................................................................... P-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Purpose of the Report ...................................................................................... 1-1 1.1.1 Organization ......................................................................................... 1-1 1.1.2 Impact Evaluation ................................................................................. 1-2 1.2 Description of the Mid-Coast Corridor .............................................................. 1-3 1.3 Alternatives under Consideration ..................................................................... 1-5 1.3.1 No-Build Alternative .............................................................................. 1-5 1.3.2 Build Alternative ................................................................................. 1-13 2.0 REGULATORY CONTEXT ......................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Federal ............................................................................................................ 2-1 2.1.1 National Environmental Policy Act ........................................................ 2-1 2.1.2 U.S. Department of Transportation Act ................................................. 2-2 2.1.3 Coastal Zone Management Act ............................................................ 2-2 2.2 State ................................................................................................................ 2-3 2.2.1 California Environmental Quality Act .................................................... 2-3 2.2.2 California Coastal Commission ............................................................. 2-4 2.2.3 University of California, San Diego ....................................................... 2-6 2.2.4 California Department of Parks and Recreation—Old Town San Diego State Historic Park Resource Management Plan and General Development Plan................................................................... 2-9 2.2.5 San Diego Unified Port District ............................................................. 2-9 2.3 Regional ........................................................................................................ 2-13 2.3.1 San Diego Association of Governments ............................................. 2-13 2.3.2 San Diego County Regional Airport Authority ..................................... 2-18 2.4 Local .............................................................................................................. 2-19 2.4.1 Land Use Plans .................................................................................. 2-19 2.4.2 Other Plans ........................................................................................ 2-32 2.4.3 Land Development Guidelines and Regulations ................................. 2-37 3.0 METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................ 3-1 3.1 Study Area ....................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Data Sources ................................................................................................... 3-1 3.3 Impacts Assessment ........................................................................................ 3-1 3.4 Impact Determination ....................................................................................... 3-3 3.4.1 National Environmental Policy Act Guidance ........................................ 3-3 3.4.2 California Environmental Quality Act Guidance .................................... 3-4 4.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................................................ 4-1 4.1 Existing Land Uses and Zoning ........................................................................ 4-1 4.2 Key Activity Centers and High-Trip Generators .............................................. 4-18 4.2.1 University City .................................................................................... 4-18 4.2.2 University of California, San Diego ..................................................... 4-18 4.2.3 Westfield UTC Shopping Center ......................................................... 4-18 4.2.4 Regional Hospitals ............................................................................. 4-19 MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT August 2014 i Land Use Impacts Technical Report Table of Contents 4.2.5 University of San Diego ...................................................................... 4-19 4.2.6 Mission Bay Regional Park ................................................................. 4-19 4.2.7 Old Town San Diego State Historic Park ............................................ 4-19 4.2.8 Other Major Activity Centers ............................................................... 4-19 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS .................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Direct and Indirect Impacts .............................................................................. 5-1 5.1.1 No-Build Alternative .............................................................................. 5-1 5.1.2 Build Alternative ................................................................................... 5-3 5.2 Cumulative Impacts ....................................................................................... 5-36 5.2.1 No-Build Alternative ............................................................................ 5-36 5.2.2 Build Alternative ................................................................................. 5-37 5.3 Construction Impacts ..................................................................................... 5-37 6.0 MITIGATION MEASURES .......................................................................................... 6-1 7.0 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT DETERMINATION ....................... 7-1 7.1 Significance Criteria and Application ................................................................ 7-1 7.1.1 No-Build Alternative .............................................................................. 7-1 7.1.2 Build Alternative ................................................................................... 7-1 7.2 Significance after Mitigation ............................................................................. 7-3 7.3 Cumulative Impacts ......................................................................................... 7-3 8.0 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................ 8-1 MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT ii August 2014 Land Use Impacts Technical Report Table of Contents List of Figures Figure 1-1. Mid-Coast Corridor........................................................................................... 1-4 Figure 1-2. No-Build Alternative Transportation Improvements .......................................... 1-7 Figure 1-3. No-Build Alternative Major Bus Routes ............................................................ 1-9 Figure 1-4. No-Build Alternative Bus Route 150 ............................................................... 1-11 Figure 1-5. No-Build Alternative Trolley Operating Plan in 2030 ....................................... 1-12 Figure 1-6. Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project ................................................................. 1-14 Figure 1-7. Conceptual Plan and Profile of Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project ................ 1-17 Figure 1-8. Genesee Avenue Design Concepts ............................................................... 1-22 Figure 1-9. Visual Simulation of Genesee Avenue with Center Columns ......................... 1-23 Figure 1-10. Visual Simulation of Genesee Avenue with Straddle Bents ............................ 1-23 Figure 1-11. Site Concept for Tecolote Road Station ......................................................... 1-25 Figure 1-12. Site Concept for Clairemont Drive Station ...................................................... 1-26 Figure 1-13. Site Concept for Balboa Avenue Station ........................................................ 1-27 Figure 1-14. Site Concept for Nobel Drive Station .............................................................. 1-28 Figure 1-15. Site Concept for Optional VA Medical Center Station ..................................... 1-29 Figure 1-16. Site Concepts for UCSD West Station (Build Alternative and VA Medical Center Station Option) ................................................................................... 1-30 Figure 1-17. Site Concept for UCSD East Station .............................................................. 1-31 Figure 1-18. Site Concepts for Executive Drive Station, with and without Genesee Avenue Design Option ................................................................................... 1-32 Figure 1-19. Site Concepts for UTC Transit Center, with and without Genesee Avenue Design Option

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    174 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us