Southeast Asian Studies, Vol. 34, No.2, September 1996 The Sarawak Chinese Voters and Their Support for the Democratic Action Party (DAP)* James CHIN** The Democratic Action Party (DAP) is arguably Malaysia's best known opposition party. The party has been in opposition since the formation of the Federation of Malaysia in 1963. Although it has consistently won a significant percentage of votes at general elections, it has never been able to win enough seats to form a government, either at the federal or state levels. The voting pattern for the DAP in Peninsular Malaysia is marked by two features. First, most of its votes come from the non-Malay population, i.e. from the Malaysian Chinese and Indian voters. Secondly, it regularly outperforms, in terms of number of votes, the Chinese-based parties in the ruling Bansan Nasional (BN) or National Front coalition - Gerakan Rakyat Malaysia (Malaysian People's Movement) and the Malaysian Chinese Association (MCA). Whatever successes the DAP enjoys in Peninsular Malaysia is not repeated in the East Malaysian States of Sabah and Sarawak, situated on the island of Borneo and divided from the Peninsular by the South China Sea. Although both states have elected several DAP candidates to the federal parliament, they are defeated at successive state elections held in the two Bornean states. This article looks at the reasons behind this phenomenon by examining DAP's performance in Sarawak since its foundation. I) Brief Background of the DAP The DAP had its roots in the split between Singapore and Malaysia in 1965. With Singapore out of the Malaysian federation, the Malaysian side of the Singapore-based People's Action Party (PAP) had to be dissolved. Many former Malayan members of the PAP came together and launched the Democratic Action Party (DAP).2) Since then, the DAP has been one of the major opposition parties in Malaysia. Its electoral support and success has come largely the urban, non-Malay population. * This is a revised version of a paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Association of Southeast Asian Studies (ASEASUK) in the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS), London, 25-27 April, 1996. ** School of History and Politics, Faculty of Humanities, Middlesex University, London N17 8HR, United Kingdom 1) It is intersting to note that little has been written about Chinese politics in Sarawak although there are sev­ eral major works on the historical roots of the Sarawak Chinese community [Tien 1953; 1983; Chin 1981 ; Chew 1991]. Chinese politics is treated as a component of Sarawak politics [Milne and Ratnam 1974; Leigh 1974; Roft 1974]. As far as I can ascertain, there is nothing written about the Sarawak DAP. 2) A succinct account of DAP's founding years can be found in Lee [1987]. 387 Since its inception in 1965, the DAP has been led by its secretary-general, Lim Kit Siang. Its basic political philosophy is based on the concept of "Malaysian Malaysia," that is, a Malaysia where ethnic status is politically irrelevant and, where plurality and multi-culturalism is protected. This policy is in direct contrast to the policies pursued by the ruling coalition, BN. Like its predecessor the Malayan Alliance, the BN, which has been in power since Malaya became inde­ pendent in 1957, is a coalition of parties that are predominantly communal. The three most important parties in the BN, the United Malays National Organisation (UMNO), the Malaysian Chinese Association (MCA) and the Malaysian Indian Congress (MIC) who represent the Peninsular Malay, Chinese and Indian communities respectively. There is a racial criteria for membership in the MCA and the MIC. For UMNO, the racial criteria for membership is to be a bumiputera ("sons of the soil") or native (read Malay).3) UMNO is the dominant partner in the BN and the posts of Prime Minister and deputy come under its purview. Mer racial riots erupted in 1969, UMNO blamed economic disparity between the Malays and the Chinese as the cause and placed the nation under emergency rule. In 1971, the National Economic Policy (NEP) was imposed by UMNO as a condition for lifting the state of emergency. Under this policy, bumiputeras (read Malay) were given preferential treatment in all social and political spheres. Quotas were set up for bumiputeras in universities, for business licenses and a host of other state-funded benefits which were allocated to this community [Jomo 1989; Ramasamy 1993]. Although the NEP was replaced by the National Development Policy (NDP) in 1991, its racial character was retained and preferential treatment of bumiputeras continues to this day. The implementation of the NEP and NDP has meant that race is singularly the most salient issue in Malaysian politics. Although the DAP preaches multi-racialism ("Malaysian Malaysia"), in terms of membership and electoral support, it is undoubtedly a non-Malay, Chinese-based party. It also manages to get a significant percentage of Indian votes. This is to be expected as both these non-bumiputera communities are officially discriminated against and denied access to economic and social opportuni­ ties simply on the grounds of their ethnic status. Sarawak's Political Setting Unlike Peninsular Malaysia's population where there are basically only three major ethnic groups: Malay (about 55%), Chinese (35%) and Indian (10%), Sarawak's 1.8 million inhabitants is much more diverse and plural. There are about 26 ethnic groups and the major ones are: Iban 30%, Chinese 30%, Malay 20%, Melanau 5%, Bidayuh 8%, and the other indigenous peoples (such as the Orang Ulu, Kayan, Kenyah, etc.) 7%. The Iban, Bidayuh and other indigenous peoples are also collec­ tively called the Dayak, while the Malay and Melanau ethnic groups are usually politically grouped together as the Muslim Malay/Melanau. Again, unlike the situation in the Peninsular, the Muslims 3) Previously, one had to be an ethnic Malay to join UMNO. However when UMNO expanded into Sabah, membership criteria was changed in order to accommodate the natives in Sabah who were not ethnic Malays. See Chin [1994]. 388 James CHIN: The Sarawak Chinese Voters and Their Support 4 are a minority in Sarawak. ) The majority of the Dayak and Chinese are non-Muslims. Politics in Sarawak centers on the constant maneuverings among the three major political groups: Dayak, Chinese and the Muslim MalayIMelanau. The Chinese are mainly represented by the Sarawak United People's Party (SUPP); the Dayak by the Sarawak National Party (SNAP) and Parti Bansa Dayak Sarawak (PBDS); and the Muslim Malay/Melanau by Parti Pesaka Bumiputera Bersatu (PBB). However, substantial Dayak membership can be found in all these political parties. All these four parties are local Sarawak-based parties and do not have branches outside the state. Another feature of Sarawak politics is the extensive use of natural resource, specifically timber concessions, as political patronage. Locals often describe it as "politics of timber." From 1970 to 1974, Sarawak was ruled by a coalition government made up of PBB and SUPP. Since 1974, Sarawak has been ruled by the Sarawak Barisan Nasional (SBN) coalition consisting of PBB, SUPP, 5 SNAP and PBDS. ) All the SBN component parties in tum are members of the federal BN led by Prime Minister Mahathir Mohammad. From 1980 to 1991, the proportion of voters in Sarawak were roughly as follows: Chinese 33%, Ibans 30%, Malay/Melanau 26%, Bidayuh 8%, and Others 3%.6) Ethnic Chinese voters made up the majority in eight state constituencies before a constituency delineation exercise in 1988. Since then, there are 11 Chinese-majority constituencies. The bulk of the Chinese voters can be found in the main urban regions with the contestants for their votes being the SUPP and DAP. Formation of Sarawak DAP The national DAP leadership had plans to expand into Sarawak in the late 1960s. Lim Kit Siang came to Kuching shortly after the 1970 Sarawak State Election, hoping to recruit several locals to 7 start a DAP branch. However, he found the locals unreceptive. ) The election result produced a coalition government between Parti Bumiputera and SUPP. Parti Bumiputera's base of support was the Muslim Malay/Melanau community while SUPP's support came mainly from the Chinese. Both parties also enjoyed a degree of electoral support from the Dayak. The new Sarawak gov­ ernment was led by Parti Bumiputera's Abdul Rahman Yakub, a Muslim Melanau. Fearing that a Sarawak branch of DAP could undermine the near-total support of the Chinese community for his coalition partner, the SUPP, Rahman banned Lim Kit Siang from entering Sarawak. During the 1974 election, Lim was stopped at Kuching airport and forced to return to the Peninsular. 8) The 4) Under the Malaysian Constitution, an ethnic Malay is defined as a Muslim, thus to be born as a Malay means one is a Muslim too. Consequently in the Peninsular, Muslims make up slightly more than half of the population. 5) PBDS left the SBN in 1987 in an attempt to capture power. This attempt failed and PBDS was forced to rejoin SBN in 1994. The reasons for this are complex and lie beyond the realm of this paper. See Chin [1996b]. 6) The data given here was compiled by the author from SUPP and PBB documents. 7) Interview with Lim Kit Siang, 29 June 1993. 8) Sarawak Tribune, 17 September 1974. Sarawak (and Sabah) enjoy special autonomy on immigration matters. This allows the chief ministers of both states to ban Malaysians from outside their respective states from entering. This right is one of the conditions under which Sarawak and Sabah entered the / 389 national DAP leadership was thus unable to enter Sarawak to set up a branch due to a hostile chief minister.