: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 19 TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2012 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. L. MANJUNATH AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHAR RP No.1503/2012 BETWEEN: 1. MALLAPPA S/O. GIREPPA TUPPAD AGE: MAJOR, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. KHANATTI, TQ: GOKAK, DIST: BELGAUM. 2. MAHADEV S/O. GIREPPA TUPPAD AGE: MAJOR, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. KHANATTI, TQ: GOKAK, DIST: BELGUAM. 3. GANGAWWA W/O. ALLAPPA TUPPAD AGE: MAJOR, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. KHANATTI, TQ: GOKAK, DIST: BELGUAM. 4. SHRISHAIL S/O. ALLAPPA TUPPAD AGE: MAJOR, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. KHANATTI, TQ: GOKAK, DIST: BELGUAM. ... PETITIONERS (By Sri. : SHARATH MAGADUM FOR HEMANT R CHANDANGOUDAR, ADV.) : 2 : AND 1. SHIVAPPA BALAPPA KARIVOLI @ KARIHOLLI AGE: MAJOR, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. MUNYAL & NAGNUR, TQ: GOKAK, DSIT: BELGUAM. 2. SANGAPPA BALAPPA KARVOLLI @ KARIHOLLI, AGE: MAJOR OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. MUNYAL & NAGNUR, TQ: GOKAK, DSIT: BELGUAM. 3. BORAWWA D/O. BALAPPA RADARATTI AGE: MAJOR OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. KHANAKATTI, TQ: GOKAK, DSIT: BELGUAM. 4. THAYAWWA D/O. BALAPPA KARIHAOLLI @ KIRIVOLLI AGE: MAJOR OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. NAGNUR, TQ: GOKAK, DSIT: BELGUAM. 5. MAHADEVI W/O. KHANAPPA KALLOLI AGE: MAJOR OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. NAGNUR, TQ: GOKAK, DSIT: BELGUAM. 6. KEMPAVVA W/O. HANAMANT KITTUR AGE: MAJOR OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. NAGNUR, TQ: GOKAK, DSIT: BELGUAM. 7. RUKMAVVA W/O. KAKASAB PATIL AGE: MAJOR OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, : 3 : R/O. KARGAON TQ: CHIKODI, DSIT: BELGUAM. 8. AVAKKA W/O. BALAPPA KARIVALLI @ KARIHOLLI, AGE: MAJOR OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. KARGAON & NAGNUR, TQ: GOKAK, DSIT: BELGUAM. ... RESPONDENTS (By Sri.: MAHESH WODEYAR FOR R1-R6) THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 AND 2 R/W SECTION 151 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER DTD:04-01-2012 PASSED IN THE RFA.NO.522/2002 ON THE FILE OF HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD. THIS RP COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, K.L.MANJUNATH, J, PASSED THE FOLLOWING:- ORDER No grounds to review the judgment. If the review petitioner is aggrieved by the judgment of the coordinate Bench of this Court, appellants have to file an appeal before the Supreme Court and not by filing a review petition, since the appeal is disposed of by the Bench on merits. : 4 : Granting such liberty, the review petition is dismissed. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE Vmb.