Chapter 11 Fraunhofer Diffraction

Chapter 11 Fraunhofer Diffraction

Chapter 11 Fraunhofer Diffraction Lecture Notes for Modern Optics based on Pedrotti & Pedrotti & Pedrotti Instructor: Nayer Eradat Spring 2009 4/30/2009 Fraunhofer Diffraction 1 Diffraction • Diffraction is any deviation from geometrical optics that results from obstruction of the wavefront of light. • Obstruction causes local variations in the amplitude or phase of the wave • Diffraction can cause image blurriness. So the aberrations. • An optical component that is free of aberrations is called diffraction‐ limited optics and is still subject to blurriness due to diffraction. • Huygens‐Fresnel principle: every point on a wavefront can be considered as a source of secondary spherical wavelets((yg)Huygens). The field beyond a wavefront is result of the superposition of these wavelets taking into account their amplitudes and phases (Fresnel). 4/30/2009 Fraunhofer Diffraction 2 Diffraction vs. interference: Diffraction phenomena is calculated from interference of the waves originating from different points of a continuous source. Interference phenomena is calculates interference of the beams origination from discrete number of sources. 4/30/2009 Fraunhofer Diffraction 3 Mathematical treatment of Diffraction • Far‐field or Fraunhofer Diffraction or : when both the source and observation screen are far from the diffraction causing aperture, so that the waves arriving at the aperture and screen can be approximated by plane waves. • Near‐field or Fresnel diffraction: when the curvature of the wavefronts an not be ignored • We will only investigate the far‐field diffraction in this course using the Huygens‐ Fresnel principle with one approximation. • When EM waves hit the edges of the aperture there is oscillations of the electrons in the matte that cause a secondary field (edge effect). • In HF approximation we ignore edge effect. So beyond the aperture there is no field. This holds only if the observation point is far from the aperture. 4/30/2009 Fraunhofer Diffraction 4 Diffraction from a single slit We simulate the gggeometrical arrangement for the Frounhofer diffraction byyp placinggp a point source at the focal point of a lens and a screen at the focal point of a lens after the amerture. The light reaching point P on the screen is from interference of the parallel rays from different points on the aperture. We consider each interval of ds as a source and calculate contribution of the all of these sources. rdsP: optical path length from the to the EL strength of the electric field contribution from each point. rr= 0 for the field from the center of the slit. CibifhilContribution of each interval ds to thfhe wavefront at po iihilint PdE is a spherical wavelflet of P: ⎛⎞EdsL ikr()-ω t dEP = ⎜⎟ e ⎝⎠ r Spherical wave amplitude ⎛⎞ EdsL ikr()()0 +Δ -ω t dEP = ⎜⎟ e ⎝⎠r0 +Δ ⎛⎞ EdL s ik()rt0 −ω ikΔ dEP = ⎜⎟ e e ⎝⎠r0 +Δ Path difference affets the phase Path difference affets the amplitude We ignore Δ in the denuminator since Δ<<r0 4/30/2009 Fraunhofer Diffraction 5 Diffraction from a single slit ⎛⎞ EdsL ikr()0 −ω t ikΔ dEP = ⎜⎟ e e ⎝⎠r0 The total electric field at the point P E b/2 EdEe==L ikr()0 −ω t edsikssinθ PP∫∫−b /2 slit r0 b /2 ⎛⎞ikssinθ ()ikbsinθθ / 2− () ikb sin / 2 EELLikr()00−−ωω teee ikr() t − EeP ==⎜⎟ e rikr00⎝⎠sinθθ−b /2 ik sin 1 With β = kbsinθ and using Euler's formula 2 EbLLsin β ikr()0 −ω t Ebsin cβ EeP == rr00β βθ variihdhiihhdies with and that varies with the difhistance from the screen. b1 βθβθ can be interpreted as phase difference kΔ→=Δ= =k sinkkb sin 22 β shows the magnitude of the phase difference at point P between the points from the center and either endppoint of the slit. 2 The irradiance IP at is proportional to the E0 : 22 22 ⎛⎞ε00cc2 ε ⎛⎞EbL siiinsββε0c ⎛⎞EbL in 2 IE==⎜⎟0 ⎜ ⎟⎜⎟22 with I000=== we have II Isin cβ ⎝⎠22⎝ r0 ⎠⎝⎠ββ2 r0 4/30/2009 Fraunhofer Diffraction 6 Diffraction from a single slit sin2 β The diffraction pattern of the light from a silt by width of b at a distanc screen II== Isin c2β where 00β 2 βθ=Δ=kkb()sin /2 is the phase difference betwwen the light from the center of the slit the endpoints. ⎛⎞sin β Let's plot the I. For the central maximum: limsinc()β == lim⎜⎟ 1 ββ→→00⎝⎠β For zeros of the sinc function: 1 sinββ=→ 0 =()kb sin θπθλ = m → bsin = m where m =±±1, 2,... 2 m = 0d0 does no tlt lead dt to a zero b e cause ofthf the spec ia l propert y of fth the si nc ftifunction. if f is the distance of the slit from the screen, then the location of the minima on the screen can be found using small-angle approximation: mλλy mf sinθ ≅ tanθ =→=→=y /fy m b fbm d⎛⎞ sinβββ cos− sin β For the other maxima: ⎜⎟==2 0 dββ⎝⎠ β Cental lobe: image of the slit with roundes edges. Side lobes: what causes blurriness in the image. Angular width of the central lobe: bsinθλ=→ λ λλ2 θθ≅≅→Δ=, , θ The central lobe will sprad as the slit-size gets smaller. 11bb− b 4/30/2009 Fraunhofer Diffraction 7 Maxima of the sinc function The maxima of the sinc function are solutions of this equation: ββcos− sin β =→0tanββ = β 2 We can solve this equation by parametrically. AlAn angle equa lil to its tangant i iis intersection ⎧y = β of the ⎨ ⎩y = tan β We see that the maxima are not exactly half way between the minima. They occur slightly erlier and as β increases the maxima shift towards the center. Ratio of the irradiances at the central peak maximum to the first of the secondary maxima ? 2 2 I ()sinββ / 1⎛⎞ 1.43π 20.18 ββ==00==== 22⎜⎟ I 1.43 sinββ / sin ββ / sin() 1.43π 0.952 βπ= ()βββ==1.43π ()β 1.43π ⎝⎠ IIβπ==1.43= 0.047 β 0 or only 4.7% of the I 0 4/30/2009 Fraunhofer Diffraction 8 Beam spreading The angular spread of the central maximm Δθ =2λ /b is independent of the distance between the slit and dscee.Soasscee screen. So as screen moves ovesaway away fro m ttestteatueotedhe slit the nature of the diffract actoion pattern does not c ha nge . W is the width of the central maximum, 2Lλ W=LΔ=θ b All of the beams spread according to diffraction as they propagate due to the finite size of the source . Even if we make them parallel with a lens still they will spread because of the diffraction. Example: What is the width of a parallel beam of λ = 546nm and width of b=0.5mm after propagation of 10 meter? 2Lλ 2×× 10 546 × 10−9 W == b 0.5× 10-3 Wmm= 21.8 This treatment of beam spreading is b2 correct for far-field where L >> λ area of aperture or more generally generall L >> λ 4/30/2009 Fraunhofer Diffraction 9 Rectangular aperture For a slit of length a and width b we calculate the diffraction pattern. We assumed a>>b in previous section. When a and b are comparable and both small we have large contriibutions to the d iffraction pattern from 2 2 ⎛⎞sinαβ ⎛⎞kk⎛⎞ sin ⎛⎞ both dimensions: II====00⎜⎟ where αθ ⎜⎟ asin and II⎜⎟ where βθ ⎜⎟ bsin ⎝⎠αβ ⎝⎠22⎝⎠ ⎝⎠ mλ fffnλ f Zeros o f the patt ern d ue occur at : y= and x= m,n=±±121, 2,... mnba a /2 b/2 EL ikr()0 −ω t ikXx// r00 ikYy r Using a bit more analysis we can write EdEePP== edxedy ∫∫∫−−ab/2 /2 slit r0 XY, are thdifhbihe coordinates of the observation poihint on the screen an d x,y are t he coordinates o f t he sur face element on the aperture. The total irradiance turns out to be the product of the irradiance functions on each 22 dimension: II= 0 ()()sin cβα sin c 4/30/2009 Fraunhofer Diffraction 10 Circular aperture For finding the diffraction pattern caused by a circular aperture we assume the incremental electric field amplitude at point P due to the surface element dA= dxdy (on the aperture) is EA dA/. / r0 . Then we integrate the incremental field over the entire aperture area. The resulting E at point P is ⎛⎞EdAikr+Δ -ω t E ikr−ω t dE=⎯⎯⎯⎯AA e()()0 Δ<<r0 →= E e()0 eisk sinθ dA PP⎜⎟ Δ=ssinθ ∫∫ ⎝⎠rr00+Δ Area By choosing the elemental area the rectangular area of dA= xds we can reduce the double integral to a single one. 2 ⎛⎞x 22 22 ⎜⎟+=sR →= x2 Rs − ⎝⎠2 2E +R 22 E = A eedsikr()0 −ω t isksinθ R− s P ∫−R r0 Substituting v==sR / and γθ ksin 2ER +1 2 E = A eedikr()0 −ω t ivγ 1− v v P ∫−1 r0 +1 2 πγJ ( ) From the intergral table: edvivγ 1− v = 1 ∫−1 γ where J1 ()γ is the first order Bessel function of the first kind. 35 γ ()γγ/2() /2 J1 () γ1 J1 ()γ =− + −" and lim = 21.21.2.3222 γ →0 γ 2 4/30/2009 Fraunhofer Diffraction 11 Field from an arbitrary shape aperture on a distant screen For finding the diffraction pattern caused by an aperture of arbitrary shape we assume the incremental electric field amplitude at point P due to the surface element dA= dxdy (on the aperture )is) is EA dA /r0. Then we integrate the incremental field over the entire aperture area. The resulting E at point P is E E==A eitkr()ω − dA where dA dxdy p ∫∫ r0 Aperture y Y 221/2 1/2 rXxYyZ=−+−+⎡⎤()()2222 with rXYZ =++⎡⎤ ⎣⎦0 ⎣⎦ x X 1/2 P 22 ⎡⎤( x + y ) 2( Xx+ Yy) r ⎢⎥Δ r we have: rr=+0 1 22 − 0 ⎢⎥rr00 dy θ ⎣⎦ P 1/2 dx 0 222 ⎡⎤2()Xx+ Yy rx00>> +y →rr ⎢⎥1 − 2 ⎣⎦r0 ()Xx+ Yy rxyrr>> + → − only first two terms.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    32 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us