Maritimes Region DFO Atlantic Fisheries Stock Status Report 96/127 New Brunswick Maine Minas Basin SWNB Nova Scotia Annapolis Basin Bay of Fundy Soft-Shell Clams The Fishery Background The fishery is currently managed under the Canadian The soft-shell clam, Mya arenaria, ranges in the Atlantic Maritime Fisheries Regulations which are being Ocean from North Carolina to the Arctic, extending south to restructured with input from the Regional Clam central Europe. In the early 1900s, it was introduced to Advisory Committees. The minimum size limit California and has since spread north to British Columbia. Although found primarily in muddy, intertidal habitats, it also (shell length) is 44 mm (1.75 in.) although some lives subtidally and in a range of sediment types. There are areas have increased this to 51 mm (2 in.). Clams separate sexes which spawn in June. may only be harvested by hand. All diggers must There are three major clam harvesting areas in the Bay of have a clam license and also a personal fisher’s Fundy: the Annapolis Basin and the Minas Basin in Nova registration. These licenses are currently frozen. Scotia and the Quoddy region in southwestern New Brunswick. Harvesting is unrestricted on open flats, but flats All of these areas are actively harvested. which are closed because of public health related The fishery for the soft-shell clam in the Canadian Maritimes issues (moderate contamination) are only allowed to has had a long history with archaeological records indicating be harvested by depuration plant diggers. These that clams were an important dietary component of the native clams are closely controlled and depurated before tribes two to three thousand years ago. Formal catch records going to market. Recreational diggers are not date back to the late 1800s. Harvesting technology has required to have a license and are permitted 100 changed very little over the last century. With the exception of a brief period in the 1950-1960s when semi-automated clams/day. hydraulic harvesting techniques were tried, hand harvesting using a clam fork (or “hack” or “digger”) is still the only Landings in the Bay of Fundy have decreased industry-sanctioned method used in the Bay of Fundy. Many of somewhat over the last seven years although they are the fishers work in several primary industry sectors likely under-estimates due to non-reporting of (agriculture, forestry, fishing) over the course of the year. catches. The decrease in catches has not been The fishery has historically been mostly regulated through uniform among the three different fishing areas as minimum size limits, harvesting methods and health safety SWNB has increased landings over the last two standards (coliform or phycotoxin area closures). Recently, years. The Minas Basin has experienced the largest individual licenses have been required (1995) and restrictions decrease over the last seven years. have been placed on recreational digging. Fishing occurs year-round in the Bay of Fundy, except in those areas which Bay of Fundy Landings (tons), Value ($’000s) experience ice cover in the winter. Harvesting can be done by any digger in open areas and only by diggers hired by 61-70 71-80 81-90 depuration plants in closed areas. There are four depuration Year Avg Avg Avg 1992 1993 1994 1995 operations in the Bay of Fundy, two in New Brunswick and two in Nova Scotia. Clams are sold to local buyers who are Wt. 1,137 2,041 2,906 1,488 1,098 1,370 1,621 generally suppliers to larger processors. Value - - - 2,208 1,648 2,387 3,223 Available from: Maritimes Regional Advisory Process, Department of Fisheries and Oceans, P.O. Box 1006, Stn B105, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada B2Y 4A2. Telephone: 902-426-8487. E-mail: [email protected] On peut se procurer une version française de ce rapport à l’adresse ci-dessus. August 1997 Maritimes Region Bay of Fundy Soft-shell Clams Clam Landings by Region Again, inter-annual pattern changes in the catch rates were not equally reflected in all areas. Catch rates 4500 4000 SWNS Minas SWNB for eastern Nova Scotia are shown for comparison 3500 (Areas 29-31). 3000 2500 Catch Rates of Clams from Various Beaches in 2000 the Bay of Fundy (1988-1991) Landings (t) 1500 1000 70 500 New Brunswick 60 0 50 1947 1950 1953 1956 1959 1962 1965 1968 1971 1974 1977 1980 1983 1986 1989 1992 1995 1988 Ye a r 40 1989 1990 30 1991 20 Growth trials of similar aged animals on beaches in CPUE (Kg/digger/tide) 10 SWNB in 1995 indicate growth rates varied 0 dramatically among beaches suggesting different 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 17 carrrying capacities for each beach. Past fishery data Location (1988-91) indicate beaches may differ significantly in 70 Nova Scotia the size distribution of clams harvested. No 60 biological data for 1995 are available from the 50 1988 40 fishery. 1989 1990 30 1991 Growth of Clams from SWNB (1995) CPUE (Kg/digger/tide) 20 10 35% 0 ) 30% 18 20 22 23 24 29 30 31 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 41 44 45 Location 25% 20% 15% 10% Location New Brunswick Location Nova Scotia 5% Mean Growth Increment (% 0% 1 Oak Bay East 18 Thornes Cove 2 Block House 20 Smith's Cove Hbr Hbr Oak Bay Northern Loutre 3 Ministers Island 22 Harbourview Indian Pt Indian Bar Road Pocologan Deadmans Clam Cove Deep Cove Harbour de Blockhouse 4 Cement Plant 23 Bear River 5 McCann Cove 24 Deep Brook 7 Bocabec 29 Cole Harbour Resource Status 8 Digdeguash 30 Three Fathom Hbr. 9 Magaguadavic 31 Clam Harbour The fishery is monitored through on-site surveys 11 Pocologan 33 Economy/Tower using summer students to collect information on the 12 Lepreau Harbour 34 Carr's Brook 13 Lepreau Basin 35 Soley Cove harvesting levels and practices of the diggers. These 14 Northern Harbour 36 Economy data are used to calculate a CPUE index for specific 15 Clam Cove 37 Five Islands clam beaches to track changes in the catch rate. 17 Duck Ponds 38 Sand Point Helicopter overflights are occassionally used to 39 Brodericks Beach measure the total harvesting effort for a tide in 41 Moose Island SWNB. 44 Sonora 45 Wine Harbour Catch rate data are not available in 1995. In the period, 1988 to 1991, catch rates from various clam Helicopter survey data suggest the effort has beaches in the Bay of Fundy ranged from 20 to 60 increased in SWNB over the past four years as the kg/digger/tide. In New Brunswick (Areas 1-17), number of diggers seen per flight increased, there was some inter-annual variability, but the same especially in Passamaquoddy Bay. change in patterns was not reflected in all sites. In Nova Scotia, the catch rates in the Annapolis Basin (Areas 18-24) were lower than those found in the Minas Basin (Areas 33-45). 2 Maritimes Region Bay of Fundy Soft-shell Clams Number of Diggers Seen per Helicopter Survey recruitment of the juveniles to the benthos appears to be related to sediment type. Recruitment can vary 2 No. Diggers Observed from 0 to over 1,000 /m over a linear distance of 30 60 m on the beach and is correlated with sediment type. 50 40 30 Outlook 20 10 The reasons for the drop in landings from the long- 0 term mean are many, but the primary one is the loss Jan-91 Oct-92 Oct-93 Mar-95 Oct-95 of many harvesting areas due to public health Pass. Bay Deer Island Campobello Grand Manan Letete-Beaver Maces Bay protection closures from faecal coliform bacteria. These closures have a two-fold effect on the fishery. Recruitment: No data are available to show First, they remove clams from the wild harvesting recruitment in comparison with the spawning stock base (although depuration plants can use moderately biomass, but there have been estimates of recruitment contaminated areas) and they concentrate the diggers to the benthos at several locations. In general, the on the other open flats. At some point, depending on numbers of recruits in SWNB and in some areas of the size and productivity of the open beaches, this the Annapolis Basin have been much higher than concentration of fishing effort can over-harvest the those reported from Maine (B. Beal, Pers. Comm.) clam populations. Other factors which affect the productivity of beaches for harvesting are: the Juvenile Clam Densities (0+ year class) occurrence of phytotoxins (such as paralytic shellfish poison (PSP), diarretic shellfish poison (DSP) and Area Year Density #/m2 domoic acid or amnesiac shellfish poison (ASP)) or Lepreau Basin 1993 550 normal changes in biological cycles in response to environmental changes (i.e. cooling or warming Lepreau Basin 1994 926 trends). These latter conditions, however, are Annapolis Basin (mean) 1994 0 - 787 temporary and affect the clam production for only fixed time periods. In comparison, the loss of clam Blockhouse 1995 5,415 flats due to faecal colifom contamination and the Oak Bay 1995 3,304 resulting drop in commercial landings will likely be permanent unless remediation measures are taken. Sources of uncertainty: The most recent The degree of change in commercial production will information is 1991. No catch rate information is depend on: 1) the succeess of the natural recruitment available for recent years. The CPUE estimates are cycles to the open beaches, 2) the success of the taken from beaches which are generally open to all remediation programs in the clean-up of the coastal diggers or depuration diggers and therefore, the zones and 3) the development of culture-based permanently closed beaches are not sampled as techniques to increase production.