Chinese Degraded Grasslands – Pathways for Sustainability

Chinese Degraded Grasslands – Pathways for Sustainability

CSIRO PUBLISHING The Rangeland Journal, 2020, 42, 339–346 https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ20033 Chinese degraded grasslands – pathways for sustainability David R. KempA,I, Karl BehrendtB, Warwick B. BadgeryC, Guodong D. HanD, Ping LiE, Yingjun ZhangF, Jianping WuG and F. J. HouH ACharles Sturt University, Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia. BHarper Adams University, Newport, Shropshire, England. CNSW Department of Primary Industries, Agricultural Research Institute, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia. DInner Mongolia Agricultural University, College of Grassland, Resources and Environment, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China. ECAAS, Institute for Grassland Research, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Regions, China. FChina Agricultural University, College of Grassland Science and Technology, Beijing, China. GGansu Academy of Agricultural Science, Lanzhou, Gansu, China. HLanzhou University, College of Pastoral Agricultural Science and Technology, Lanzhou, Gansu, China. ICorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract. The 400 m ha of grazing lands in China, mainly across the north and west of the country, have similar problems to those throughout the steppe of Mongolia, Central Asia and neighbouring countries. The grasslands are in drier regions (50–500 mm) across mainly Inner Mongolia, Xinjiang, Tibet, Qinghai, Gansu and Sichuan, often at higher altitudes on the Tibetan, Mongolian and Loess Plateaus, and have for millennia supported the livelihoods of millions of herders. By 2002, surveys were classifying 90% of the grasslands as degraded. Less than 10% were considered desertified to the extent that replanting was the only option to restore some plant cover. The majority of the grasslands were considered capable of being rehabilitated to some degree through changing management practices. In the 1980s the first Grassland Laws were promulgated, initiating a series of programs aimed at rehabilitating the grasslands. These programs included the establishment of individual ‘user rights’ to herders to use a defined area of grassland and the imposition of grazing bans, often for five years, to rehabilitate degraded areas. These were often applied at a regional level. At the same time, herders were encouraged to have more livestock as that was seen as a pathway to lift them from poverty. The sheep equivalent of grazing animals for the whole of China, has increased 4-fold since 1949, often by greater amounts in some regions. But there was very limited work done on how best to manage grazing livestock in ways that could aid grassland rehabilitation. In the early 2000s a collaborative program was started between several Australian and Chinese Institutes, to investigate better ways of rehabilitating the grasslands and to improve herder incomes from livestock. This work involved the development of four models that could use the limited data available, to help guide a series of research programs. These models indicated that halving stocking rates could maintain or increase herder net incomes. Farm demonstrations showed this result applied in practice and grasslands did improve. A series of grazing experiments found that halving the current stocking rates was needed to enable the survival of the better plant species within the grassland. A model that estimated the net value of each animal indicated that often half the animals were generating marginal or negative incomes, and could be culled without affecting the household income, again substantiated in farm demonstrations. In this paper, the causes of degradation, which can be traced back to the progressive changes that have occurred in China since 1949, are discussed together with the practice changes that have come from a large collaborative research program between Australia and China. Efficient markets and land tenure reform are needed to help create the incentives for herders to change in sustainable ways. Keywords: China, degradation, grasslands, herders, Mongolia, overgrazing, rehabilitation, solutions, steppe. Received 6 May 2020, accepted 10 October 2020, published online 19 November 2020 Introduction ability to sustain herder households (Li 1999; Ren et al. 2001;Lu China has 400 m ha of grasslands that have sustained the live- Fan and Liu 2002;Luet al. 2005; Hong 2006; Hong 2011; Kemp lihoods of herders for millennia, but since the 1990s there has and Michalk 2011a). In 2002, the State of Environment Report been considerable concern about their degrading condition and (SOE 2002) estimated that grassland degradation in China was Journal compilation Ó Australian Rangeland Society 2020 Open Access CC BY-NC www.publish.csiro.au/journals/trj 340 The Rangeland Journal D. R. Kemp et al. 1200 3.0 Total sheep SE Total goat SE Total cattle SE Total horse SE 1000 Total camel SE Total stocking rate 2.5 800 2.0 600 1.5 SE/ha SE (millions) 400 1.0 200 0.5 0 0 Year 1954 1959 1964 1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999 2004 2009 Fig. 1. Cumulative livestock numbers, as sheep equivalents (SE), and average stocking rate (SE/ha) 1950–2014 (Kemp 2020) increasing at 2 million ha per annum. These grasslands are part shifts are among the existing species, understandable in eco- of the vast Eurasian grasslands that extend from eastern China systems where there are several thousand species. In terms of and Mongolia to eastern Europe, with many common species environmental services, there is an associated sequence of and characteristics throughout. Precipitation is mainly through declining animal production from the initial decline in overall summer (50–500 mm) with a 3–5 month growing season when nutritive value, then declining plant growth, reduced residual temperatures are above 08C, then genuinely cold winters that are herbage mass, decreasing diversity, poorer nutrient cycling, below –208C for extensive periods in all regions. Areas on the reduced water quality, lower soil carbon and soil erosion Mongolia Plateau are colder than Tibet. In China, 90% of the increases (Kemp Li et al. 2020). This list of provisioning, reg- grasslands were considered to be overgrazed, though only 10% ulating and supporting services (Millennium Ecosystem were in a state of rapidly increasing desertification and would Assessment 2005) relates to the grassland characteristics that require planting. Across the varying regions of China, it is herders identify as critical for grassland condition (Bruegger estimated that the grasslands are over-grazed by 27–89% et al. 2014). These environmental services do not all decline at (Zhang et al. 2014). Herders in China are among the poorest the same time and rate. From a management perspective, it is people in the country, and poverty alleviation is a major ongoing argued (Kemp Li et al. 2020) that more attention needs to be paid government goal. Livestock are primarily used for meat and for to managing the herbage mass as that is an early indicator of some less-valuable fibre production. For many sheep, the cost of decline and does correlate closely with all the other key services. shearing exceeds the value of the fleece, while cashmere prices have been very volatile and goat numbers have declined. The use Political and livestock changes of large animals for draft and transport has greatly reduced over China had major political changes through the last century since recent decades. In this paper, we discuss the causes of grassland the 1949 revolution, which affected the numbers of livestock and degradation, which can be traced back to the progressive their impact on the grasslands (Fig. 1). Since 1949 when there changes that have occurred in China since 1949, and then how were 250 m sheep equivalents in China, livestock numbers had a large collaborative research program between Australia and risen to 1000 m by 2010. In 1949 after the Chinese Communist China (Kemp 2020) has identified practice changes to rehabil- party took control of the country from feudal landlords, there itate the grasslands and improve herder incomes. was an initial recovery period in livestock numbers (7.5% per annum, 1950–57) then a relatively steady rise (1.2% per annum, Grassland degradation 1958–84) during the period of collective farms. During the The typical pattern in grassland degradation found in many collective farm period cattle were primarily used for mechanical grassland ecosystems is an initial shift from palatable to less- power, not consumption, and there was limited trading in live- palatable species – a reversible change – then species loss and stock. Chinese scientists believe that the grasslands were in potentially irreversible losses in plant productivity, followed by reasonable condition during this period, though some were gradually declining plant cover. In the worst cases, there is clear being over-grazed. Unfortunately, there were no studies at that evidence of desertification with soil loss, chemical and hydro- time to document grassland condition. Studies in more recent logical changes (Ferna´ndez-Gime´nez et al. 2018; Jamsranjav years have often only examined stocking rates changes since et al. 2018). The Chinese grasslands differ from many in around 2000, and then argued that stocking rates have not been Australia, in that few annual species ever become a significant the cause of grassland degradation. A longer-term view is clearly component and there are almost no invasive, exotic species. The needed. Chinese degraded grasslands The Rangeland Journal 341 The first Grassland Law in China, in 1985, was to address a necessarily for animal production. The ‘producer’ pays more range of issues, including the improvement of herder incomes and attention to managing their animals through the year and sells a to aid rehabilitation of some degrading grassland areas. This higher proportion of their animals. They aim to be more efficient coincided with the opening up of markets and the progressive in animal production. The ‘breeder’ engages in more intense allocation of individual user rights to specific areas of land for management of their animals and aims for a high level of each herder household and a specified number of animals per efficiency. Today more herders in China are oscillating in the household.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    8 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us