Changing Paradigms for Engineering

Changing Paradigms for Engineering

I I I I I Nomad independence: In a nomad society, the I technology needs are basically limited to tools for I I hunting, herding, and gathering and to erecting a I temporary shelter. I I Agrarian economy: Tool requirements extend to Time I cover farming and storage and to erecting a per- Concept Demise I I manent shelter. This era covers most of human I civilization. I Fig. 1. Technology life cycle. I Industrial revolution: Within a generation during I the last century, technology expanded to very large, I I complex systems requiring multiple workers. Infor- Extending the life Cycle I mation is controlled by the system owner. Shelter I Because of the transition cycles, few companies I moves past needs to wants, but the location is con- can thrive for long periods of time. Two ap- I trolled by the work site. Adequate resources are avail- I proaches appear to be the dominant models for able for limited saving and planning for the future. I survival. The first cleans up the old act. The sec- I Information explosion: Technology explodes to I ond takes a new tack. ubiquitous availability for anyone wanting to learn I Resurrection: This is not part ofthe life cycle, but I and willing to take risks. Shelter location can be at I rather is an admirable effort to recapture some of the choice of the owner. Resources are available to I the strength of the dream, stretch the life of the I those who seize the available information#. maturity segment, and enhance the life of the or- I In adeveloped society, all these exist simultane- I ganization. I ously. Later advancements are simply added op- The new corporation is a development to sal- I tions. With each change, it is apparent that the I vage a historical management hierarchy from satia- I choices are greatly augmented. Nevertheless, not tion and demise. The basic premise is to reduce I everyone will access the opportunities of the new I costs and number of people, employ technology I paradigm because of ties to and dependence on the where feasible, and focus on a core business. Com- I previous period. I panies that have effectively changed their organiza- I tion have been rewarded substantially by the stock I I market increasing the value of shares {4]. I Application technology, such as computers, is I life Cycle I Within each technological era, a defined business used to enhance ancillary performance. New ad- I vancements in the core business technology may I life cycle follows technology development. Technol- I ogy is dominant during the birth and period of not occur as they should. Nevertheless, costs will I growth. Munagement brings in a period of stability be controlled to the point of extending maturity. I I and expansion by acquisition. Legal protection and The organizational structure becomes very flat. I risk avoidance portend the end. The curve can be One designated hitter will have numerous people I I plotted with money, recognition, or some other directly under his authority. The organization I measure of wealth on the vertical axis, and time on again takes on some of the image of entrepreneurs. I I the horizontal [3]. Each worker is responsible for his own performance I The corresponding technology cycle is pro- without supervision. A slip-up or politicalfauxpm, I I posed. (1) Any new technology begins with a and he is out. I dream, a concept ot an idea. (2) As the dream be- Support services consist of a personal computer I and voice mail. With the rapid developments, the I comes focused, aplan matures and a process forms. I (3) During a growth phase, the system has reached type of support will change before this article is I published. Technology has been elevated to re- I critical mass; it can progress merely on its own I merits. (4)As a technology reaches maturity, the duce costs. Many specialized functions, such as I design, training, and construction, are outsourced I wealth curve flattens out over the bandwidth of the I life cycle. The system is stable enough to be self- to specialists. I Network: Companies that flourish become man- I sustaining until a replacement technology arrives. I (5)The new technology begins to push the wealth agers of technology. The major chore becomes co- I curve downward at the roll-of. (6) No new applica- ordination among the three corners of the product I I tions exist for the original technology during the triangle-suppliers, marketers, and transporters. I satiation. (7) Eventually the plug is pulled for the The technology is developed and provided by out- I I demise. Fig. 1 graphically illustrates the life cycle. side sources. The managers develop a distribution I At the turn of this century, the productive system to the client for the product. It may take on I I period of technology could exceed that of one a private label or a widely recognized branded I generation. With the approach of the next cen- moniker. The remaining pin of the triangle is re- I I tury, technology life expectancy is often less sponsive transportation for movement of products I than five years. and information. I I I IEEE Industry Applications Mngazine II March/A,uril I 998 @ I I I I I I From this basis, every closed, physical system I a I can be identified as “zero-sum’ game In other I words, if there is an increase or winner in one area, I then there must be a corresponding decrease or I I loser in another area This is a valid observation I when the system is completely and adequately de- I I fined Notice that one of the necessary criteria is a I closed system A closed system is completely self- I I contained without any outside influence In other I words, there is no substantive growth I I This is highly desirable in a control system I Damping is used to force the performance to a sta- I Fig. 2. Network for technologists. I ble condition Stable by definition means there is I no building or growth I I I----A more significant observation is that many I Product Marketer Client systems can be regarded as open These have a con- I L I tinually changing source of energy that is derived I Fig. 3. The client’s perspective. from outside the narrowly defined arena If a closed I system is a “zero-sum” game, then an open system I Under this structure, the individual risks are I can be described as a “find-more” game limited. Nevertheless, managers can draw on the I For example a nomadic society attributes value I financial strength of the suppliers. Different levels to hunting and herding skills and equipment I of risk are allocated to the independent entities. I Within the society, he who has the most arrows I The cost of manufacture and product develop- and can deliver them is the winner Others lose out I ment is concentrated at the most effective source. I on the available game This is a closed system I Cost of customer education and development is lo- Enter the agrarian society Game has less sig- I cated nearest the client. Cost ofvehicles and move- I nificance while land ownership, domesticated live- I ment is relegated to innovators. Cost of stock, and crops take on a new meaning The I coordination and responsibility for support is con- I technology advances allow the farmer to achieve a centrated at the manager. Improved cost, service, I more stable, greater wealth It is not at the expense I and access of goods are provided to the client. I of the hunter The skilled hunter can flourish and Within an information society, this is the opti- I maintain his limited wealth without interference I mum system [5]. The technologists in each of the I from the farmer as long as they avoid the same land corners of the triangle, the manager, and the client I The society, then, is not a closed, but an arche- I are independent. However, the network shown in I type ofan open system Outside energy comes from Fig. 2 makes a winning system for all. I technology development The technology provides I Although the support system appears as a trian- value to items previously without worth I gle, the client sees only a straight line. From his I Within a defined set of conditions, physical sys- I perspective, all the components are collapsed into a tems are closed However, technology, which is an I telescope under the marketer (Fig. 3). I outside influence, by definition creates an open I Many unfortunately feel they have no opportu- system for a society Unlike a “zero-sum” condi- I nity because there is nothing new to be developed. I tion, many can experience growth and wealth I This concept is steeped in the traditional without it being at the expense of others This is I technology-management-legal life cycle. In reality, I the model to be expected if the world is adequate 90% ofpurchases now are for things that did not ex- I for human survival and development I ist 20 years ago. New ways of doing old things and I development of new things are growing explosively. I Theory Economics I The major wealth in the past 20 years has come of I Economic theory during the span of the United from managing, developing, and applying tech- I States has been built on the work ofAdam Smith in I nology to distribution.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    9 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us