North West Register 2019 HERITAGE AT RISK 2019 / NORTH WEST Contents The Register III Sefton 66 St Helens 68 Content and criteria III Wirral 70 Key statistics V Warrington (UA) 72 Key to the entries VI Entries on the Register by local planning VIII authority Blackburn with Darwen (UA) 1 Blackpool (UA) 2 Cheshire East (UA) 2 Cheshire West and Chester (UA) 6 Cumbria 9 Allerdale 9 Barrow-in-Furness 12 Carlisle 13 Copeland 16 Eden 17 Lake District (NP) 21 South Lakeland 27 Greater Manchester 30 Bolton 30 Bury 32 Manchester 33 Oldham 36 Rochdale 38 Salford 40 Stockport 42 Tameside 45 Trafford 47 Wigan 47 Halton (UA) 49 Lancashire 50 Burnley 50 Chorley 52 Fylde 53 Hyndburn 53 Lancaster 54 Pendle 56 Preston 56 Ribble Valley 57 Rossendale 58 West Lancashire 60 Wyre 62 Merseyside 63 Knowsley 63 Liverpool 63 II HERITAGE AT RISK 2019 / NORTH WEST THE REGISTER Many structures fall into the ‘not applicable’ category, The Heritage at Risk Register includes historic for example: ruins, walls, gates, headstones or boundary buildings and sites at risk of being lost through stones. neglect, decay or deterioration. Condition is assessed as ‘very bad’, ‘poor’, ‘fair’ or It includes all types of designated heritage assets, ‘good’. The condition of buildings or structures on including Conservation Areas, which are designated the Register is typically very bad or poor, but can be and assessed by Local Planning Authorities. fair or, very occasionally, good. This reflects the fact that some buildings or structures are vulnerable The aim of the Register is to focus attention on because they are empty, underused or face those places in greatest need. Historic England, in redundancy without a new use to secure their partnership with others, is able to help tackle future. Assessing vulnerability in the case of buildings heritage at risk. We work with owners, friends in fair condition necessarily involves judgement and groups, developers and other stakeholders to find discretion. A few buildings remain on the Register in imaginative solutions for historic places and sites at good condition, having been repaired or mothballed, risk across England. but still awaiting a new use or occupancy. More information about our role, the advice and Buildings or structures are removed from the funding available, and useful publications and Register when they are fully repaired/consolidated, guidance is available on our website. and their future secured either through occupation and use, or through the adoption of appropriate Criteria for inclusion management. on the Register PLACES OF WORSHIP To be considered for inclusion on the Register, places RISK ASSESSMENTS of worship must be listed grade I, grade II* or grade II on the National Heritage List for England, and be used Heritage assets included on the Register are assessed as a public place of worship at least six times a year. according to the nature of the site. The risk assessment methodologies outlined below are based Places of worship are assessed on the basis of on factors which can threaten the different types of condition only. If a place of worship is in very bad or heritage assets and lead to them becoming at risk. poor condition, it is added to the Register. This includes places of worship which are generally in fair BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES or good condition but have major problems with one key element, like the tower. To be considered for inclusion on the Register, buildings or structures must be: Once on the Register, places of worship can move through the condition categories (e.g. from very bad • listed on the National Heritage List for England; to poor, to fair, even good) as repairs are and implemented and the condition improves, until they • in secular (non-worship) use. are fully repaired and can be removed from the And either: Register. This means that there are some places of • a grade I or II* listed building, or worship in good condition on the Register but with • a grade II listed building in London, or outstanding issues still to be resolved at the time when • a structural scheduled monument with they were assessed. upstanding remains. ARCHAEOLOGY Buildings or structures are assessed on the basis of condition and, where applicable, occupancy (or use) To be considered for inclusion on the Register, reflecting the fact that a building which is occupied archaeological sites must be listed as scheduled is generally less vulnerable than one that is not. monuments and included on the National Heritage List for England. Occupancy (or use) is assessed as ‘vacant’, ‘part- occupied’, ‘occupied’, ‘not applicable’, or occasionally, Archaeology assessments cover scheduled ‘unknown’. earthworks and buried archaeology. III HERITAGE AT RISK 2019 / NORTH WEST The risk assessment is based on their condition and Wreck sites are assessed based on their current vulnerability, the trend in their condition, and their condition, vulnerability and the way they are being likely future vulnerability. A site’s condition is managed. expressed in terms of the scale and severity of adverse effects on it, ranging from ‘extensive Wrecks are vulnerable to both environmental and significant problems’ to ‘minor localised problems’. human impacts. Risks that contribute to inclusion on the Register range from unauthorised access to Archaeological entries are removed from the erosion and fishing damage. The monitoring process Register once sufficient progress has been made to ensures that the significance of the site is identified address the identified issues, and a significant and maintained. In spite of the inherent difficulties in reduction in the level of risk has been demonstrated. caring for this type of site, careful management must be maintained. PARKS AND GARDENS Wrecks are removed from the Register once an To be considered for inclusion on the Register, parks appropriate management and monitoring regime and gardens must be listed as grade I, grade II* or is operational. grade II and included on the National Heritage List for England. Parks and gardens are assessed in terms of CONSERVATION AREAS condition and vulnerability. Steps being taken by owners to address problems are also taken into Once a year Historic England asks every local consideration. authority in England to consider the state of its conservation areas and fill in (and update as Parks and gardens assessed as being at risk are typically appropriate) risk assessment questionnaires for affected by development and neglect. They have those that cause concern, or are believed to no frequently been altered by development or are faced longer be at risk. with major change. The original function of these landscapes has often changed and divided ownership Conservation areas that are deteriorating, or are in leads to the loss of their cohesive historic design. very bad or poor condition and not expected to change significantly in the next three years, are Park and garden entries are removed from the defined as being at risk. Register once steps have been taken to address issues and positive progress is being made. The approach taken to assess conservation areas at risk has been refined since the first survey in 2008/2009. An BATTLEFIELDS overall category for condition, vulnerability and trend is included for each conservation area on the Heritage at To be considered for inclusion on the Register, Risk Register. Conservation areas identified as at risk in battlefields must be listed and included on the 2009, but not reassessed since using the revised National Heritage List for England. Battlefields methodology, are included on the Register but with deemed to be at risk of loss of cultural significance limited information. are included on the Register. Conservation areas are removed from the Register The principal risks and threats are: once plans have been put in place to address the • development pressure e.g. issues that led to the conservation area being at risk, encroachment of buildings; and once positive progress is being made. • pressures of particular use within the site e.g. arable cultivation; • damage e.g. unregulated metal detecting. Battlefields are removed from the Register either when damaging activities cease/are managed, or when threats recede due to effective planning. WRECK SITES To be considered for inclusion on the Register, wrecks must be listed and included on the National Heritage List for England. IV HERITAGE AT RISK 2019 / NORTH WEST Key statistics Nationally, damage from arable cultivation is the greatest cause of risk affecting 37.6% of archaeological entries on the Register. In the BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES North West the proportion is 9.3%. The Nationally, 748(3.3%) of grade I and II* listed greatest risk, to 45.3% of entries on the buildings (excluding places of worship) are North West Register is from unrestricted on the Register. In the North West the plant, scrub and tree growth. The national percentage is 4.6% (74listed secular figure for plant, scrub and tree growth is buildings). 26.3%. 6 building or structure entries have been PARKS AND GARDENS removed from the 2018 North West 102 (6.1%) of England’s 1,669 registered Register because their futures have been parks and gardens are on the Register. Of secured, and 4 have been added. the 136 registered parks and gardens in the North West, 7 (5.1%) are on the Register. 53.5% of buildings or structures (84) on the North West baseline 1999 Register have No park and garden entries were added or been removed because their futures have removed from the 2018 North West been secured compared with the national Register. figure of 65.3%. BATTLEFIELDS PLACES OF WORSHIP Of the 47 registered battlefields in England, 3 Nationally, 6.2% of listed places of worship (6.4%) are on the Register. None of the 4 are on the Register.
Details
-
File Typepdf
-
Upload Time-
-
Content LanguagesEnglish
-
Upload UserAnonymous/Not logged-in
-
File Pages83 Page
-
File Size-