. Forum on Public Pollcy --' T$ Mac]-0- Language Policy And Planning And Lack Of Proficiency In Language Learning And Use By Nigerian Students Wale Adegbite, Department of English, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-lfe, Nigeria Abstract In this study, the problem of' non-proficiency in language learning and use among Nigcrian students is investigated. Using empirical data and information from available literature on the sub,jcct as evidence. it was observed that the language deficiencies of the students could be attributed to the lack of fit between the formulation of the national (macro-) language policy and planning and implementation procedures. in view of the comple\ity of the socio-cultural, multilingual and multi-cthnic context ol' the nation. I he perceptions 01' students' language deticiencies at different levels of education were described and the attendant effccts on national development stated. A "bottom-top" proposal \\,as then made for initial prioriti~ationof micro-language policies and planning procedures that would later provide bases for viable macro-policy and planning projects. 1. Introduction Doing fieldwork, analyzing data and publishing papers in learned journals should not be our only preoccupation as lingt/isrs. Our social responsibility demands that we look beyond tlie classroom to see how we can empower Nigeriun 1ungziuge.v for use in education and other domains.' (Emphasis ours) The observation above will serve the purpose of this paper with a slight modification on the expressions highlighted. For 'linguists, who are the target of tlie above address, we substitute 'intellectuals' to extend the population of human actors; and we interpret 'Nigerian languages' more inclusively to refer not only to indigenous languages, as intended in the quotation, but to all langi~ages in Nigeria, both indigenous and non indigenous. The intention is to admonish the addressee to embark on more advocacy or practical work of language development.' This study investigates the lack of proficiency in language learning and use by Nigerian Students and attributes this mainly to a lack of fit between tlie national language policy, on the one hand, and planning and implementatiun procedures, on the other hand. It then suggests an initial bottom-up prioritization of micro-language policies, planning and implementation procedure that would provide support for a more viable macro-language policy. 'A\O Rarnghose, '.l,inguistics and Social Responsibility: T~heChallenges li,r the Nigerian 1,ingllist.' (ticynote Addrcss Delivered at thc 20"' Annual Conrerence of thc Linguistic Associaticin ol' Nigeria at thc Nigerian Educational Research and Development Council. Abuja. Nigeria, November 13-17. 2006). - Jibril avers that a colnbination of research, advocacy and activism is recluired by ling~liststo bring about a reversal of policies so that African languages may grow and Ilourish. See Munzali Jibril, .'NcL\~Directions in African Ling~~istics."In Reillinking [l7e H~lrnaniliesin Africa, ed. Sola Akinrinadc. et al. (Ile-lfe: Faculty of Arts. Obafen~iA\volowo University, 2007), 28 1. Forum on Public Policy The paper is divided into five sections as follows: the context of languages and education in Nigeria; language policy, planning and implementation in education; proficiency level of students in language learning and use; alternative policy and planning strategies; and conclusion. 2. The Context of 1,anguages and Education in Nigeria Nigeria has about has about 400 languages which have been categorized in different ways by scholars, based on the parameters of sequence of acquisition, number of speakers, and roles assigned to languages. The categorization in terms of number of speakers and roles assigned to languages has provided us with the following labels3: i. Dominant official language, English, spoken by a small population of speakers; ii. Major ethnic languages, regional lingua francas, proposed but not utilized as official languages: Hausa, Igbo and Yoruba; iii. A trans-national language, proposed as second official language: French iv. Main ethnic languages used in network news: Angas, Edo, EfikIIbibio, Fulfirde, Kanuri, EbiraJ Igala, Idoma, Ijo, Nupe, Tiv, etc.; v. Minor ethnic languages: Fula, Ikwere, Itsekiri, Jukun, Kalabari, etc.; vi. Restricted lingua franca: Pidgin English; vii. Languages for religious and personal use: Arabic, Latin and German. Another categorization presents tlie stat~lsof Nigerian languages in ethnographic terms thus: dominant, deprived, endangered and dying! The dominant label matches English in Nigeria. The deprived languages refer to Hausa, Igbo and Yoruba, which though have a relative advantage over the minority languages in terms of extent of their 3 Wale Adcgbite. "Enliphtc~~mentand Attit~ldesof the Nigerian Elite on the Roles of Languages in Nlgzria." Languuge. ('u1ru1.r and C'urr-iczilun~16:2 (2003): 185-86. 1 A!o llamgbose. "Dcprii cd. Lndnngcred and Dying Languages" L)iogenes I h l ( 1993): 19-25. Forum on Public Policy use mainly for informal communication, are less officially recognized than English. Endangered languages are minority languages that are used very little, for informal communication, or are not used at all. Lastly dying languages are languages that are almost in extinction. On the educational context, we observe that apart from the informal education or Iiome training that is generally assumed for all human beings, the iVational Policy on ~ducarion' has a list of the following categories of education: Early ChildhoodIPre- primary (2-5years); Basic education (Primary and Junior Secondary): Primary education (6- l l years); Secondary education: Junior (3 year duration) and Senior (3 year duration): Tertiary education: Mass literacy, Adult and Non-formal Education; Science, Teclinical and Vocational education; Open and Distance Education; and Special Education. While primary to tertiary education above has been administered in scliools over several decades, the others are designed as ad-hoc or remedy programmes to tackle problems as they arise. The SCI~OO~S are of two types, viz. public schools run by tlie state and private schools owned by individuals and organizations. The general impression of Nigerians in recent times is that education of children is better in private scliools than in public schools, because the former has better infrastructi~resand management than the latter, which has suffered neglect over the years. The consequence of this is that only the children of the low working class attend public scliools, while tlie rich and others who can afford it send their children to high fee paying schools at liome or abroad. It is however, important to note that the private scliools are of different standards and the quality of education received by learners differs in them. 3. Language Policy, Planning and Implementation in Etlucation The language provisions pertaining to education are contained in several sections of the NPE. But these can be properly considered in relation to tlie general provisions on language in the Constitution of the Federal Republic of ~i~eria'.Below, we present the language provisions in both documents that are relevant to the discussion in this study. 1. The business of the National Assembly shall be conducted in English and in Hausa, Ibo (sic) and Yori~bawhen adequate arrangements have been made therefore. I.'cdc~-alRep~~blic oJ'Nigcria. lLntiona1 Policy 017 lidl'dlrcalion (1 977. re\.iscd 1981. 1998 and 2004). licl2renccs are made to the 2004 edition in this paper, henceforth as NPE. Fedcral Republic ol'Nigcria, 1999 Consfi~~ifionoflhe Federal Rep~iblicof h'igeria, henceforth rcferred to as The C'onstirution. Forum on Public Policy The Constitution 1999, Paragraph 55 2. Tlie business of a House of Assembly shall be conducted in English, but the House may in addition to English conduct the business in one or more other lang~lagesthat the house may by resolution approve. The Constitution 1999, Paragraph 97 3. Government appreciates the importance of language as a means of promoting social interaction and national cohesion; and preserving cultures. Thus every child sliall learn the language of the immediate environment. Furthermore i9n the interest of national unity, it is expedient that every child shall be required to learn one of the three Nigerian languages, Hausa, Igbo, and Yoruba. (NPE, 2004, Para. 1 Oa) 4. For smooth interaction with our neiglibours, it is desirable for every Nigerian to speak French. Accordingly French shall be tlie second official language in Nigeria and it shall be compulsory in Primary and Junior Secondary schools but Non-vocational elective at tlie Senior Secondary School. NPE 2004, Para 1 Ob 5. Government sliall ensure that the medium of instruction is principally the mother tongue or the language of the immediate community.. ... Early Cliildliood/Pre-Primary Education (NPE Para 14c) 6. The medium of instruction in the primary scliool shall be tlie language of the environment for the first three years. During this period, Englisli will be taught as a subject. From tlie fourth year, English sliall progressively be used as the medium of instruction, and the language of the environment and French shall be taught as subjects. Primary Education (NPE, Para 19e arid 190 7. Junior Secondary Scliool (NPE, Para. 24a) Core Subjects (Languages): English, French and Language of immediate environment. Forum on Public Policy (The language of the immediate environment shall be taught as Ll where it has orthography and literature.