Evaluation Report Montenegro LG

Evaluation Report Montenegro LG

Evaluation of the project “Strengthening mechanisms for public finance at the local level in Montenegro” Lilit V. Melikyan 10/12/2013 Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................................................................... 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................................................... 8 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................................... 12 1.1. Background and objective of the project .............................................................................................................. 12 1.1.1. Country context: local governance and local government finance .............................................................. 12 1.1.2. Budget process ............................................................................................................................................ 14 1.1.3. The project concept ..................................................................................................................................... 14 1.2. Purpose of the evaluation ..................................................................................................................................... 15 1.3. Structure of the Evaluation report ......................................................................................................................... 15 2. METHODOLOGY OF THE EVALUATION ............................................................................................................... 16 3. PROJECT SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................. 20 4. FINDINGS ..................................................................................................................................................................... 21 4.1. Relevance ............................................................................................................................................................. 21 4.1.1. Assessment of the project identification and formulation process .............................................................. 21 4.1.2. Assessment of the relevance of project concept and focus ......................................................................... 23 4.1.3. Relevance of project design ........................................................................................................................ 29 4.1.4. Selection of municipalities .......................................................................................................................... 30 4.1.5. Additionality/Synergies .............................................................................................................................. 30 4.1.6. Logical framework ...................................................................................................................................... 31 4.2. Effectiveness: Outputs and Short term Outcomes ................................................................................................ 35 4.2.1. Result 1: Mechanism for transparent and accountable public finance at the local level established and operational 36 4.2.2. Result 2: Municipal bonds market in Montenegro is strengthened through better understanding of benefits and opportunities among municipalities ......................................................................................................................... 43 4.2.3. Result 3: Fiscal equalization mechanisms in Montenegro further strengthened. ........................................ 45 4.2.4. Policy level Support .................................................................................................................................... 47 4.3. Potential for longer term outcomes (LTO) and impact ......................................................................................... 49 4.3.1. LTO 1: Efficiency and transparency of Government improved in order to effectively lead policy formulation, coordination and service delivery in accordance with European Union requirements. .............................. 49 4.3.2. LTO 2: Government capable to efficiently managing the requirements of independence and European Union accession ............................................................................................................................................................. 53 4.3.3. Potential for Impact: socio-economic development at the local level through strengthening accountable, transparent and results oriented public finance mechanisms .......................................................................................... 53 4.4. Efficiency ............................................................................................................................................................. 54 4.5. SUSTAINABILITY ............................................................................................................................................. 56 4.5.1. Policy Level ................................................................................................................................................ 56 4.5.2. Results level ......................................................................................................................................................... 57 5. CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................................................................ 57 6. LESSONS LEARNED ................................................................................................................................................... 59 7. RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................................................................... 60 ANNEXES............................................................................................................................................................................... 62 2 ANNEX 1: Terms of Reference .......................................................................................................................................... 62 ANNEX 2: List of the meetings .......................................................................................................................................... 65 ANNEX 3: References ........................................................................................................................................................ 66 ANNEX 4: Project Budget .................................................................................................................................................. 67 ANNEX 4: Municipalities’ Revenues and Expenditures, 2008-2012 ................................................................................ 68 ANNEX 4: Questionnaire .................................................................................................................................................. 71 ANNEX 5: Interview guide ................................................................................................................................................ 77 ANNEX 6: Agenda for the field visit ................................................................................................................................. 83 ANNEX 7: The Communications Strategy of the Project .................................................................................................. 84 List of Boxes Box 1: Key Definitions .............................................................................................................................................................. 7 Box 2: Feedback from a KII .................................................................................................................................................... 29 Box 3: Indicators to Assess Openness of Municipality Decision Making, CDT, 2013 ............................................................ 52 List of Figures Figure 1: Administrative Map of Montenegro ........................................................................................................................... 6 Figure 2 Method of Triangulation ........................................................................................................................................... 16 Figure 3: Steps in Contribution Analysis ................................................................................................................................. 16 Figure 4: Total amounts of Loans and Borrowings, (Euro) .................................................................................................... 22 Figure 5 Loan Debt Balance as of 12.2012 ............................................................................................................................. 27 Figure 6 : Arrears and Debt repayment by local governments 2008-2012, million Euros ....................................................... 27 Figure 7: Training

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    87 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us