24- Arizona Women's Golf 2003

24- Arizona Women's Golf 2003

Sunriver, Ore. T10. Cristina Baena 76-79-68-74—297 (+9) 3. Texas ..................................... 1198 (+46) Crosswater Course T65. Christina Monteiro 77-73-77-81—308 (+20) 4. Southern California ............... 1199 (+47) Par-72, 6,502 yards T81. Jill Gomric 82-76-75-79—312 (+24) 5. T ennessee .............................. 1206 (+54) 1999% T7. Jenna Daniels 76-76-72—224 (+11) 1. Duke ........................................ 895 (+43) May 19-22 T7. Krissie Register 76-74-74—224 (+11) T2. Arizona State ........................... 903 (+51) Tulsa, Okla. T21. Christina Monteiro 76-80-72—228 (+15) T2. Georgia .................................... 903 (+51) Tulsa Country Club T35. Jill Gomric 77-77-77—231 (+18) 4. ARIZONA ................................. 904 (+52) Par-71, 6,202 yards 47. Cristina Baena 79-80-74—233 (+20) 5. Pepperdine ............................... 911 (+59) 1998 8. Jenna Daniels 72-70-75-73—290 (+2) 1. Arizona State ........................... 1155 (+3) May 20-23 T10. Krissie Register 74-73-71-74—292 (+2) 2. Florida .................................... 1173 (+21) Verona, Wis. T20. Marisa Baena 74-71-75-76—296 (+8) 3. ARIZONA ............................... 1174 (+22) University Ridge Course T30. Heather Graff 70-78-75-77—300 (+12) 4. Duke ...................................... 1179 (+27) Par-72, 6,033 yards T50. Jill Gomric 75-74-76-80—305 (+17) 5. Louisiana State ...................... 1187 (+35) 1997 T2. Marisa Baena 72-73-73-69—287 (-1) 1. Arizona State ......................... 1178 (+26) May 21-24 T20. Heather Graff 76-73-75-73—297 (+9) 2. San Jose State ...................... 1180 (+28) Columbus, Ohio T31. Krissie Register 71-76-76-78—301 (+13) 3. ARIZONA ............................... 1190 (+38) Scarlet Course T49. Jenna Daniels 73-76-78-79—306 (+18) 4. Stanford ................................. 1191 (+39) Par-72, 6,101 yards T85. Jill Gomric 79-79-83-78—319 (+31) 5. UCLA ..................................... 1192 (+40) 1996 1. Marisa Baena 70-75-78-73— 296 (+8) 1. ARIZONA* .............................. 1240 (+88) May 22-25 T6. Heather Graff 82-77-73-74—306 (+18) San Jose State ...................... 1240 (+88) La Quinta, Calif. T13. Krissie Register 80-77-77-76—310 (+22) 3. T exas ..................................... 1241 (+89) La Quinta Dunes Course T67. Christina Tolerton 82-82-83-81—328 (+40) 4. UCLA ..................................... 1243 (+91) Par-72, 6,230 yards 79. J. Anne Krizman 82-89-87-81—333 (+45) 5. Stanford ................................. 1248 (+96) 1995 T14. Heather Graff 74-70-76-76—296 (+8) 1. Arizona State ........................... 1155 (+3) May 24-27 T44. Ulrika Johansson 79-76-75-76—306 (+18) 2. San Jose State ...................... 1181 (+29) Wilmington, N.C. T60. Brenna Cepelak 76-75-78-80—309 (+21) 3. Wake Forest .......................... 1185 (+33) Landfall’s Dye Course T90. Christina Tolerton 84-73-85-80—322 (+34) 4. Stanford ................................. 1188 (+36) Par-72, 6,061 yards 98. Kelly Heffer 81-91-79-81—332 (+44) 5. Indi ana ................................... 1194 (+42) 12. ARIZONA ............................... 1224 (+72) 1993 3. Leta Lindley 76-74-68-72—290 (-2) 1. Arizona State ......................... 1187 (+19) May 26-29 49. Ulrika Johansson 80-78-77-76—311 (+19) 2. Texas ..................................... 1189 (+21) Athens, Ga. 68. J. Anne Krizman 80-82-75-80—317 (+25) 3. San Jose State ...................... 1190 (+22) University Golf Course 91. Laura Draeger 80-80-84-83—327 (+35) 4. Georgia .................................. 1197 (+29) Par-73 91. Shani Roth 81-82-81-83—327 (+35) 5. Southern California ............... 1212 (+44) 14. ARIZONA ............................... 1242 (+74) 1992 2. Annika Sorenstam 72-68-72-71—283 (-5) 1. San Jose State ...................... 1171 (+19) May 27-30 7. Ulrika Johansson 76-74-72-71—293 (+5) 2. ARIZONA ............................... 1175 (+23) Tempe, Ariz. 29. Leta Lindley 76-75-75-73—299 (+11) 3. Georgia .................................. 1181 (+29) Karsten Golf Course 32. Debbie Parks 76-74-73-77—300 (+12) 4. Stanford ................................. 1187 (+35) Par-72 88. Laura Draeger 82-81-77-81—321 (+33) 5. UCLA ..................................... 1193 (+41) 1991 1. Annika Sorenstam 74-72-70-74— 290 (-2) 1. UCLA .................................... 1197* (+29) May 22-25 21. Mette Hageman 76-76-77-74-303 (+11) 2. San Jose State ...................... 1197 (+29) Columbus, Ohio 37. Leta Lindley 82-73-77-77—309 (+17) 3. ARIZONA ............................... 1212 (+44) Scarlet Course 63. Debbie Parks 78-81-83-74—316 (+24) 4. South Florida ......................... 1217 (+49) Par-73 69. Susan Pankau 78-80-82-78—318 (+26) 5. Georgia .................................. 1222 (+54) 1990 1. Susan Slaughter 72-76-74-75— 297 (+9) 1. Arizona State ......................... 1206 (+54) May 23-26 18. Martina Koch 79-75-73-78—305 (+17) 2. UCLA ..................................... 1222 (+70) Hilton Head Island, S.C. 52. Mette Hageman 81-74-79-82—316 (+28) 3. Florida .................................... 1223 (+71) Arthur Hills GC 61. Debbie Parks 78-78-75-87—318 (+30) 4. San Jose State ...................... 1225 (+73) Par-72 65. Paige Gilbert 79-80-76-84—319 (+31) 7. ARIZONA ............................... 1228 (+76) 1989 2. Susan Slaughter 74-78-70-72—292 (E) 1. San Jose State ...................... 1208 (+40) May 24-27 17. Martina Koch 78-75-73-77—303 (+11) 2. Tulsa ...................................... 1209 (+41) Palo Alto, Calif. 47. Mette Hageman 81-73-79-81—314 (+22) 3. Oklahoma State ..................... 1219 (+51) Stanford Golf Course 47. Kim Kell 79-80-78-78—315 (+23) 4. ARIZONA ............................... 1220 (+52) Par-73 75. Kathryn Imrie 77-79-78-87—321 (+29) 5. Florida .................................... 1230 (+62) 1988 13. Martina Koch 77-74-73-71—295 (-1) 1. Tulsa ......................................... 1175 (-9) May 25-28 16. Kris Hoos 73-73-76-74—296 (E) T2. Arizona State ............................ 1182 (-2) Las Cruces, N.M. T60. Mette Hageman 81-75-73-76—305 (+9) T2. Georgia ..................................... 1182 (-2) T60. Kathryn Imrie 78-71-82-74—305 (+9) 4. Florida ........................................ 1184 (E) Par-74 80. Lara Mack 78-81-79-72—310 (+14) 5. Duke ........................................ 1186 (+2) 8. ARIZONA ................................. 1191 (+7) 1987 25. Martina Koch 74-73-74-79—300 (+8) 1. San Jose State ...................... 1187 (+19) May 27-30 33. Kris Hoos 76-75-76-74—301 (+9) 2. Furman .................................. 1188 (+20) Albuquerque, N.M. 59. Lara Mack 77-79-70-80—306 (+14) 3. Florida .................................... 1190 (+22) UNM Championship Course 65. Kathryn Imrie 72-77-81-78—308 (+16) 4. Southern California ............... 1191 (+23) Par-73 95. Felicia Brown 80-81-80-80—321 (+2) 5. M iami (Fla.) ............................ 1192 (+24) 12. ARIZONA ............................... 1214 (+46) 1983 36. Denise Martinez 78-74-77-80—309 (+13) 1. Tex as Christian ........................ 1193 (+9) May 25-28 56. Nancy Tomich 78-79-83-75—315 (+19) 2. Tulsa ...................................... 1196 (+12) Athens, Ga. 60. Kristie Kolacny 77-75-89-75—316 (+20) 3. Georgia .................................. 1206 (+22) University Golf Course 68. Michelle Bell 82-86-76-75—319 (+23) 4. Southern Methodist ............... 1209 (+25) Par-74 71. Kathy Budai 78-79-81-82—320 (+24) 5. Florida .................................... 1215 (+31) 11. ARIZONA ............................... 1240 (+56) 1982 16. Nancy Tomich 76-78-75-76—305 (+13) 1. Tulsa ...................................... 1191 (+23) May 26-29 48. Susie Berdoy 78-80-76-83—317 (+25) 2. Te xas Christian ...................... 1227 (+59) Palo Alto, Calif. 65. Kristy Kolacny 80-85-83-74—322 (+30) 3. Oklahoma State ..................... 1233 (+65) Stanford Golf Course 78. Kathy Budai 77-82-85-81—325 (+33) 4. Florida .................................... 1234 (+66) Par-73 WD. Michelle Bell WD 5. Texas A&M ............................. 1246 (+78) T13. ARIZONA ............................. 1269 (+101) #Tied for lead after regulation 72 holes, but lost a one-hole sudden death playoff. %Tournament’s fourth round was canceled due to lightning and thunderstorms. C Won in a team playoff. 24- ARIZONA WOMEN’S GOLF 2003 Women’s Golf National Championships 1996 NCAA National Champions On its way to capturing the program’s first national championship, the 1996 women’s golf team found out there is a fine line between life and death. It took the shot of a lifetime by star freshman Marisa Baena during a sudden- death playoff to lift the Cats to a one-stroke victory over San Jose State in what has been called one of the most exciting finishes in NCAA history. Baena had already claimed the individual championship with a score of 296 - a comfortable seven-stroke advantage over the nearest competitor - when she holed a 147-yard eight-iron shot for eagle on the par-four 18th which proved to be the difference in the playoff. The Cats scored a 15 on the hole and the Spartans carded a 16. “It was the greatest shot I’ve ever seen under that kind of pressure,” said head coach Rick LaRose, who also led the UA men’s team to its first national title in 1992. “There have been a lot of great golf shots, but under these circumstances, with a team victory on the line, nothing’s bigger.” Baena redeemed herself after missing a birdie putt on the 18th hole of regulation that would have given Arizona the title outright.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    7 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us