SPATIAL DATA IN WIDE GEOSPACE Authors: Adamczyk Tomasz Begović Vlasta Bieda Agnieszka Bielecka Elżbieta Bugaj Piotr Dawidowicz Agnieszka Džunić Irena Gajos Małgorzata Jankowska Marlena Kereković Davorin Krukowska Katarzyna Kryszk Hubert Kurowska Krystyna Parzych Piotr Rahmonov Oimahmad Schrunk Ivančica Wójciak Ewelina Źróbek Ryszard Scientific Editors Prof. Ryszard Źróbek Ph. D. Agnieszka Dawidowicz Reviewers: Ph. D. Małgorzata Dudzińska Ph. D. Marta Gross Published by: Croatian Information Technology Society, GIS Forum 10 000 Zagreb, Ilica 191e, Croatia University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn 10-719 Olsztyn, Oczapowskiego 2,Poland University of Silesia 40-007 Katowice, Bankowa 12, Poland ©Copyright Croatian Information Technology Society, GIS Forum, Croatia University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland University of Silesia, Poland All rights reserved Number of copies: 100 ISBN 978 -953-6129-43-0 Nacionalna knjižnica, Zagreb, Croatia 2 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................................... 5 1. PARADIGM SHIFT IN GEOSPATIAL DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT ................................................... 6 1.1. Fundamentals of data quality evaluation ............................................................................................ 7 1.2. Evaluation of Database of Topographic Objects. The case study of Minsk Mazowiecki. Materials and methods ................................................................................................................................................. 8 1.3. Results .............................................................................................................................................................. 10 1.4. Conclusions .................................................................................................................................................... 13 2. REPEATABLE PATTERNS IN FORMING PLANNING SPACE ................................................................ 16 2.1. Rules of spatial planning .......................................................................................................................... 16 2.2. Model fragment of planning space....................................................................................................... 17 2.3. Case study ....................................................................................................................................................... 19 2.4. Conclusions .................................................................................................................................................... 26 3. ZONING FEE ASPECTS ......................................................................................................................................... 27 3.1. What is a zoning fee? ................................................................................................................................. 27 3.2. Who is obliged to pay a zoning fee and why? ................................................................................. 28 3.3. How high is a zoning fee? ......................................................................................................................... 29 3.4. When will a zoning fee not be charged? ............................................................................................ 30 3.5. Problems with settling real property values for the purposes of determining zoning fees. 30 3.6. Conclusions .................................................................................................................................................... 34 4. ELABORATION OF THE VALUE MAPS FOR AGRICULTURAL REAL PROPERTIES IN THE RESOURCE OF THE AGRICULTURAL PROPERTY AGENCY (APA) USING THE GIS TOOLS .............. 35 4.1. Material and Methods ................................................................................................................................ 37 4.2. Results and Discussion.............................................................................................................................. 38 4.3. Conclusions .................................................................................................................................................... 44 5. POSITIONAL DATA OF UTILITY CADASTRE AS A BASIS FOR CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT PUBLIC LIGHTING INFRASTRUCTURE ..................................... 45 5.1. European smart cities ............................................................................................................................... 45 5.2. Energy reconstruction of Zagreb – ZagEE Project ........................................................................ 46 5.3. Public street lighting .................................................................................................................................. 48 5.4. Regulation of public lighting .................................................................................................................. 49 5.5. Spatial information management for local government City of Zagreb .............................. 51 5.6. VodGIS data store structure for public lighting ............................................................................. 52 5.7. Column property, place setting, management and service ....................................................... 54 5.8. Conclusions .................................................................................................................................................... 55 6. SPATIAL DATA INFRASTRUCTURE IN SELECTED COUNTRIES ........................................................ 56 6.1. Methodology .................................................................................................................................................. 58 6.2. Assessment of the NSDI ............................................................................................................................ 65 6.3. Evaluation of geoportals work efficiency ......................................................................................... 67 6.4. Implementation of the INSPIRE Directive Annexes I, II and III in selected NSDI ........... 70 6.5. Conclusions .................................................................................................................................................... 70 7. LIABILITY IN THE USE OF GIS IN US LAW SHALL POLAND LEARN FROM THE EXPERIENCED PLAYERS? ............................................................................................................................................. 72 7.1. American state of play ............................................................................................................................... 73 7.1.1. Murray v. United States – the inaccurate data on the map ............................................ 73 7.1.2. Reminga v. United States – improperly marked data in question on the map ...... 74 7.1.3. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company vs. Jeppesen & Company – a defect of the graphic depiction of the data on the map .................................................................................................... 76 7.1.4. Saloomey v. Jeppesen & Co. – defective data portrayed on the map ......................... 77 7.1.5. Barbara A. BROCKLESBY, et al., v. UNITED STATES and Jeppesen and Co. – defective data ........................................................................................................................................................... 77 7.1.6. A few Remarks on the stand of US law .................................................................................... 78 7.2. Jeppesen’s state of play ............................................................................................................................. 78 7.3. Polish state of play ...................................................................................................................................... 80 7.4. Conclusions .................................................................................................................................................... 82 8. VEGETATION SUCCESSION AND SOME SOIL FEATURES IN FORMER MILITARY TRAINING AREAS IN EXAMPLE OF BORNE SULINOWO ........................................................................................................ 83 8.1. Study area ....................................................................................................................................................... 83 3 8.2. Materials and methods ............................................................................................................................. 84 8.3. Results and discussion .............................................................................................................................. 84 8.4. Conclusions .................................................................................................................................................... 90 9. THE LATE ROMAN SEABORNE TRADE IN THE EASTERN ADRIATIC ............................................ 91 REFERENCES ...................................................................................................................................................................... 98 LIST OF FIGURES ...........................................................................................................................................................