Graphite Within Carbonaceous Phyllite, Mahakoshal Group, Central Indian Tectonic Zone

Graphite Within Carbonaceous Phyllite, Mahakoshal Group, Central Indian Tectonic Zone

SCIENTIFIC CORRESPONDENCE Graphite within carbonaceous phyllite, Mahakoshal Group, Central Indian Tectonic Zone The Precambrian crust of Central India south. It comprises chemogenic and vol- mapping at 1 : 12,500, it was observed comprises two Archaean cratonic do- cano-sedimentary sequences of Green- that CP (Figure 2 a and b) extends inter- mains, namely, Bundelkhand in north schist facies (Roy et al.2 and Acharyya3, mittently over cumulative strike length and Bastar in south, which were accreted and references therein). of ~10.3 km and ~40 m average width along the ENE–WSW trending Protero- The carbonaceous phyllite (CP) of (Figure 1). The steep inclinations of zoic Central Indian Tectonic Zone Agori Formation, Mahakoshal Group ~80°–85°SSE, extensive brecciation, (CITZ) bounded between the Son– which is confined within the shear zone crushing, secondary ferruginization, nu- Narmada North Fault (SNNF) and the was first observed by Kanchan and merous quartz veins, quartz porphyroc- Central Indian Shear Zone (CIS), and ex- Pandhare4. The presence of graphite lasts and large-scale silicification were tending for more than 800 km in length based on softness and finger soiling observed in the shear zone trending and 120–150 km wide. The CITZ con- within this CP was vaguely speculated. ENE–WSW and having strike length of tains low- to medium-grade Proterozoic Subsequently, CP was mapped at about 8 km. The flaky carbon lenses supracrustal belts set amidst migmatitic 1 : 25,000 (ref. 5). Random samples of within the CP, were systematically sam- gneisses and granitoids. The Mahakoshal CP analysed gave fixed carbon values up pled at 25 × 5 m interval. They were dis- supracrustal belt, a northern part of CITZ to 3.2%. tinguished by their greyish-black colour, is a prominent fault-controlled asymme- An exploration programme was formu- flaky and splintery nature, metallic lustre trical rift basin1. It extends for more than lated to undertake ‘mapping of the area, and comparatively low specific gravity. 600 km along strike and forms an E–W confirmation and delineation of graphite, The possibility of flaky carbon lenses to ENE–WSW trending terrain along the its systematic channel/groove sampling, being graphite was checked in the field Son–Narmada lineament, wherein it is ore microscopy, EPMA studies, fixed (powder was immersed in a glass full of bounded by SNNF in the north and South carbon analysis and Major-Trace-REE water, wherein flakes were found to Narmada South Fault (SNSF) in the geochemistry’. During the course of float), which strongly suggested the Figure 1. Part of a large-scale geological map (1 : 12,500) representing the disposition of actual outcrops of Agori Formation of Mahakoshal Group and younger intrusives in the Kunri–Baharia study area, part of toposheet no. 63H15 trending N60°E direction along with altitude measure- ments and two sets of faults. Lat.–long. of the map is removed deliberately. The map is cropped for a better view of graphite lenses and host-rock carbonaceous phyllite (CP). 192 CURRENT SCIENCE, VOL. 121, NO. 2, 25 JULY 2021 SCIENTIFIC CORRESPONDENCE Table 1. Fixed carbon values of carbonaceous phyllite host and graphite lenses Sample no. % Fixed carbon ME/JBP/2020/BRS83/29805 2.90 ME/JBP/2020/BRS84/29805 2.25 ME/JBP/2020/BRS85/29805 2.40 ME/JBP/2020/BRS86/29805 3.15 ME/JBP/2020/BRS87/29805 1.15 ME/JBP/2020/BRS88/29805 1.60 ME/JBP/2020/BRS89/29805 2.55 ME/JBP/2020/BRS90/29805 2.80 ME/JBP/2020/BRS91/29805 2.90 ME/JBP/2020/BRS92/29805 3.40 ME/JBP/2020/BRS93/29805 2.65 ME/JBP/2020/BRS96/29805 2.35 ME/JBP/2020/BRS97/29805 4.05 ME/JBP/2020/BRS105/29805 2.45 ME/JBP/2020/BRS109/29805 5.10 ME/JBP/2020/BRS110/29805 4.40 ME/JBP/2020/BRS111/29805 4.45 ME/JBP/2020/BRS112/29805 5.85 ME/JBP/2020/BRS113/29805 4.40 ME/JBP/2020/BRS114/29805 5.45 ME/JBP/2020/BRS115/29805 2.50 ME/JBP/2020/BRS116/29805 4.25 ME/JBP/2020/BRS118/29805 5.70 ME/JBP/2020/BRS119/29805 4.40 ME/JBP/2020/BRS120/29805 4.15 ME/JBP/2020/BRS121/29805 2.55 ME/JBP/2020/BRS122/29805 3.65 ME/JBP/2020/BRS123/29805 3.10 ME/JBP/2020/BRS124/29805 4.60 ME/JBP/2020/BRS125/29805 2.45 ME/JBP/2020/BRS127/29805 4.25 Note: Each sample represents 5 m channel/groove sampling. Fixed carbon results of 81 samples are awaited. The lat.–long. of each sample are deliberately removed. Figure 2. a, The Gossan formed in CP showing huge Malachite stains and boxworks. It is highly ferruginized and limonitized. b, c, Felsic tuff observed in CP. b, Old working showing huge malachite stains deep inside. d, Graphite lenses within CP near the contact between mafic intrusion and CP. CURRENT SCIENCE, VOL. 121, NO. 2, 25 JULY 2021 193 SCIENTIFIC CORRESPONDENCE Figure 3. a, Raman spectroscopic analysis at National Centre of Excellence in Geoscience Researches (NCEGR), GSI, Kolkata of sample 1 of graphite lenses associated within CP. b, Graphite band (G) at 1580 cm–1. Figure 4. a, Raman spectroscopic analysis at the NCEGR, GSI, Kolkata of sample 2 of graphite lenses associated within CP. b, Graphite band (G) at 1581 cm–1. 194 CURRENT SCIENCE, VOL. 121, NO. 2, 25 JULY 2021 SCIENTIFIC CORRESPONDENCE same. The polished sections for selective delineating any significant resource7,8, the necessary facilities for this study; Hemraj samples of the flaky carbon lenses were the confirmation of graphite in this do- Suryavanshi (NMH-II) for technical guidance analysed using Raman spectroscopy at main opens up new opportunities for re- and also for foreseeing the potential of the study area. Tapan Pal (Deputy Director Gen- National Centre of Excellence in Geo- evaluating graphite potential of the area. eral, GSI, Madhya Pradesh) for discussions science Researches, GSI Kolkata. Three during the preparation of this manuscript; point measurements each for two poli- 1. Roy, A. and Bandyopadhyay, B. K., Geol. Sandip Nandy (Director, SU: MP, Jabalpur) shed sections gave graphite band (G) for technical guidance regarding Raman spec- (Figures 3 and 4; 1580 and 1581 cm–1 re- Surv. India, Spec. Publ., 1990, 28, 226– 240. troscopy analysis; Gladson Bage and D. Ravi- spectively)6 establishing the prevalence 2. Roy, A., Hanuma Prasad, M. and Devara- sankar, Senior Geologists, for formulating this of graphite (Figure 2 d). The graphite jan, M. K., Gondwana Res., 2002, 5, 489– project, and Rupsa Mukherjee (NCEGR, GSI, lenses extend for a cumulative 650 m 500. Kolkata) for timely analysis of the samples length and 20 m average width. The 3. Acharyya, S. K., Gondwana Res., 2003, 6, for Raman spectroscopy. We also thank the fixed carbon values of systematic chan- 197–214. subject editor Prof. N. V. Chalapathi Rao nel/groove sampling of graphite lenses 4. Kanchan, V. K. and Pandhare, S. A., Re- (Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi) for use- ful suggestions. ranged from 2.06% to 5.85% (Table 1), port, Geological Survey of India, 1974, against the Indian Bureau of Mines cut- Accession no. 11043. off of 2% for crystalline flake variety. 5. Tripathi, U., Yuvraj, M., Ravishankar, D. Received 22 April 2021; revised accepted 20 The documentation of graphite lenses and Gupta, M. K., Report, Geological Sur- June 2021 vey of India, 2013, Item no. 007/ within the Palaeoproterozoic Mahakoshal STM/CR/MP/2012/005. Group increases the possibility of un- 6. Tuinstra, F. and Koenig, J. L., J. Chem. earthing of rare earth elements and vana- Phys., 1970, 53, 1126–1130. PATEL VANIT VIJAYBHAI* dium usually associated with graphite. In 7. Dutta, S. M. and Mathur, A. L., Report, PRABHAT KUMAR SAHU addition, the presence of huge malachite Geological Survey of India, 1978, Acces- A. K. TALWAR stains (Figure 2 b and c) and at places sion no. CR-014437. malachite and azurite encrustations sup- 8. Mathur, A. L., Report, Geological survey Geological Survey of India, ported by encouraging copper values up of India, 1979, Acc. no. CR-015520. Central Region, to 1.4% in the CP, suggest the multi- State Unit Madhya Pradesh, mineral potential of the area. Although ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. We thank the Jabalpur 482 003, India earlier explorations carried out in this ADG and HOD, Geological Survey of India *For correspondence. area for base metals did not result in (GSI), Central Region, Nagpur for providing e-mail: [email protected] Light-weight unmanned aerial vehicle surveys detect dugongs and other globally threatened marine species from the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India Unmanned aerial surveys are used across of Gulf of Kutch (Gujarat), Gulf of Man- lia10,16,17. In India, though aerial surveys the globe to study marine megafauna as nar and Palk Bay (Tamil Nadu), and were recommended to study dugongs12,18, they cover large spatial scales, reduce Andaman and Nicobar Islands13,14. Also, no efforts were undertaken prior to this survey effort and time, and are cost- their population in the country is consi- study. 1,2 11 effective . Due to their utility in cover- dered regionally endangered and is In the present study, we conducted ing large areas and accessing remote estimated to be less than 200–300 indi- reconnaissance aerial surveys to detect locations, aerial surveys act as excellent viduals14. This has prompted the Govern- dugongs with an aim to systematically tools to monitor several marine taxa such ment of India to initiate the Endangered estimate their populations from known as elasmobranchs3,4, marine turtles5, pin- Species Recovery Programme for their habitats. These areas have been identi- nipeds6, cetaceans7, and sirenians includ- long-term conservation and persistence15.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    4 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us