PASA-BSVA SA Future State, Demands and Pressures Online Final

PASA-BSVA SA Future State, Demands and Pressures Online Final

South Africa Future state, demands and pressures September 2017 © 2017 BankservAfrica and PASA. All rights reserved. Contents • Introduction • Methodology • Acknowledgements • Payment trends in South Africa • South African demographic and economic context • Proposed goals of modernisation • Proposed approach to modernisation • Appendix • Macroeconomic scenarios • Four pillars of financial inclusion • Feasibility and impact analysis • SA LVPI modernisation risks • Reference list • Terms and definitions 2 © 2017 BankservAfrica and PASA. All rights reserved. Introduction Future state, demands and pressures This report is the second part of a three-part series on low-value payment system infrastructure (LVPI) modernisation. It aims to provide a substantiated view of the future consumer and user demands on South Africa’s LVPI, including anticipated demographic changes and pressures in South Africa, the impact of these changes on consumer and user needs, and the technological, and societal pressures that contribute to them. Over 40 in-depth industry interviews have also provided deep insight into how these changes are perceived by the industry and its customers, and the requirements of a modernisation programme. Report objectives Describe and discuss current and future concerns of South African stakeholders, both in the public and private sectors, related to: • Consumer and user demands and pressures • Technology demands and pressures Provide an analysis of the impact of demographic and socio-political changes on consumer demand on the LVPI. This analysis also includes a review of the economic situation, projections for future economic growth and the impact on the LVPI. Provide an analysis of the impact of financial inclusivity requirements on the LVPI. Report outline This report is structured into three parts following the introductory section: 1. The first part details the South Africa context within which modernisation of the LVPI needs to occur and determines the implications for the design that is required to serve all South Africans. 2. The second part examines proposed modernisation goals expressed by South Africa interviewees. These goals relate to future user and consumer demands, regulatory and technology pressures that are the impetus for modernisation. Feedback from interviews is then compared to modernisation goals from other markets as examined in report 1A, Modernising payment systems: International comparison. 3. Lastly, the report derives an approach to the process of modernisation from the suggestions made by interviewees. 3 © 2017 BankservAfrica and PASA. All rights reserved. Methodology A broad range of methods were used to gain insight Research methodology summary Data collection Analysis Primary research Secondary research All interviews were transcribed and the transcripts In-depth discussions with 45 Review of existing literature were reviewed to create thematic codes. Thematic industry stakeholders from a and public sources, including coding is a form of qualitative analysis which range of stakeholders in the the World Bank, StatsSA, involves recording or identifying passages of text payments industry, including SARB, the UN, and the WEF or images that are linked by a common theme or banks, system operators, users, (a complete list of sources are idea allowing you to index the text into categories and associations. Also provided in the appendix of and therefore establish a framework of commissioned economic this section) thematic ideas. scenarios to judge the impact of growth on payments. Project timeline Project start date Interviews with stakeholders Completion of deliverables May 2017 June - July 2017 August - September 2017 May - June 2017 July – August 2017 Project planning & Analysis secondary research Report contributors Lipis Advisors is an international company based in Berlin, IQbusiness is a South African independent management focused solely on the payment system industry. Leo Lipis is the consulting company with 18 years experience in payments founder of Lipis Advisors, and has nearly 20 years of experience related change projects across 17 countries in Africa, with in payment systems management, consulting and research extensive work in the financial services sector. Natalie Matthews throughout Europe and the Americas. leads the Card and Payments team at IQbusiness. 4 © 2017 BankservAfrica and PASA. All rights reserved. Acknowledgements The authors would like to extend their gratitude to the individuals who participated in the primary research section of the study during the five week data collection period. Organisations Individuals 1. Kotie Coetzee – U Bank 27. Ravi Shunmugam - FNB Banking Other 2. Ghita Erling – Discovery Bank 28. Hendrik Pelser – Absa • Absa • Old Mutual 3. Mark Elliott - MasterCard 29. Gavin Reubenson – ATM Solutions • Bidvest Bank • CENFRI 4. Rudi Botha - Direct Transact 30. Pieter Swanepoel – Real Pay / CIBA • Capitec Bank • Shoprite 31. Edward Leach- SARB • Discovery Bank • APIS 5. Hennie Dreyer - Direct Transact 32. Annah Manganyi – SARB • FNB • Gates 6. Anthony de Gery-Birch - Direct 33. Shaun Rayfield - SARB • Investec Foundation Transact 34. Arif Ismail - SARB • Mercantile Bank 7. Jan Moganwa - Absa 35. Tim Masela - SARB • Nedbank 8. Jill Murtagh – Bidvest Bank 36. Sydney Gericke - Nedbank • Standard Bank 9. Neil Capazorio – Bidvest Bank 37. Graeme Holmes - Nedbank • SARB 10. Elan Sean Krug – Bidvest Bank 38. Ian Carter - Nedbank • Ubank 11. Matthew Coaker – Mercantile Bank 12. John Elliott - Investec 39. Richard Southey – Absa 13. Rufaida Ismail - Investec 40. Ingrid Goodspeed – PASA Board 41. Steven Kark – Pay Corp System Operators 14. Richard Williams – Investec 42. Nic Smalle – APIS • ATM Solutions 15. Tremaine Hechter – Shoprite 43. John Anderson – Standard Bank • BankservAfrica 16. Andre Du Plessis – Capitec Bank 44. Arthur Cousins – SADC Banking • Direct Transact 17. Andre Bouwer – Capitec Bank Association • MasterCard 18. Michael Swart – Capitec Bank 45. Elizabeth McQuerry – Glenbrook / • Pay Corp 19. Johann van Tonder – ASISA Gates Foundation • Real Pay 20. Chris Van Wyk – Old Mutual 21. Paul Mauritz – Old Mutual 46. Chris Hamilton – BankservAfrica 22. Leizl Lubbe – Old Mutual 47. Martin Grunewald – BankservAfrica 48. Emile Burger – BankservAfrica • Associations 23. Lumke Dlukulu – Old Mutual 49. Ruhling Herbst – BankservAfrica • ASISA 24. Arthur Schenck – Old Mutual 50. Dale Morris – BankservAfrica • CIBA 25. Wayne Poolman – Old Mutual 51. Walter Volker – PASA • PASA 26. Barry Cooper – CENFRI 52. Maurits Pretorius – PASA • SADC Banking Association 53. Gail Clarke - BankservAfrica 5 © 2017 BankservAfrica and PASA. All rights reserved. A brief history 50 years of payments in SA 6 © 2017 BankservAfrica and PASA. All rights reserved. The existing South African LVPI According to PASA, the National Payment System (NPS) encompasses the entire payment process from payer to beneficiary and includes settlement between banks. The process includes all the tools, systems, mechanisms, institutions, agreements, procedures, rules or laws related to payments. The NPS facilitates the circulation of money, that is, it enables transacting parties to exchange value. The Low Value Payments Infrastructure (LVPI) supports payments which fall below R5 million. Various payment streams exist for low value payments, as summarised below. The Existing LVPI Cash EFT Card Cheques • SA is a predominantly • EFT includes all varieties of • Cards make up more than • Cheques have seen a cash-based society. electronic credit and debit half of all non-cash massive reduction over the instruments and this transaction volumes but last ten years and are not • Cash usage continues to system has served the only 7% of the value of accepted by most grow with more than 50% country well for many retail payments in 2016. merchants. of the value of consumer years. Card usage has increased transactions being from 45% to 56% of retail • Cheques make up just 1% completed with notes and • EFT Credits made up 79% volumes since 2010. of the value of retail coins according to a recent of retail payments by value study. in 2016, up from 70% in • High transaction costs payments in SA, but only 2010. affect the affordability of 0.2% of the volumes. • Cash is particularly vital to card for certain segments lower LSMs. Some South • EFTs are popular as they of the market. • SARB has declared the Africans who have bank are a trusted payment intention to phase out accounts continue to method. A 2015 study by • Lack of access to paper cheques. transact exclusively in IPSOS indicated that 22% infrastructure such as cash. of South African internet ATMs and POS for rural users made purchases South Africans plays a part • Trust, convenience, and using EFT Credit as their in the limited use of cards lack of fees combine to preferred method. in these areas. make cash attractive. • South Africa was early to launch real-time, low-value payments. Uptake has been low due to high cost and inconsistent service levels. 7 © 2017 BankservAfrica and PASA. All rights reserved. Payment trends in SA Retail transactions by type per year The use of electronic payments is on the rise in SA as demonstrated by the increase in EFT and card Volumes values and volumes over the past decade. However, 3 500 cash usage also continues to grow. 3 000 Combined Card 2 500 EFT Debit The use of electronic payments § The volumes and values of electronic payments have 2 000 EFT Credit steadily increased since 2010. 1 500 RTC § EFT credit transactions

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    83 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us